Next year, I will 100 % guarantee the rules will change to allow a last second basket made to be 100% reviewable to CONFIRM said play was good. Fouls, out of bounds, anything. Make it all reviewable. Make it right if it isn’t good. Keep it if it’s good. No brainer. It’s just obviously the thing to do, and no one will disagree, because NOBODY wants to lose on a bad or missed call.
If nothing else, tonight will be the end of this rule.
- Thread starter SBP
- Start date
As I said above anything in the last 2 minutes should be reviewable!!
The B1G Show guys said as much
Of course the RU screw was needed before this rule will be changed
They should refer to it as the Rutgers rule
You just know if they make it a rule we'll be the team to be victims to it first.
They'll probably keep the rule to justify how bad a no call was. But agreed it's a ridiculous rule especially when a game is on the line. We've seen bs calls reviewed. Guy made a tremendous or even lucky shot. But it shouldn't have counted.
A separate rule change needed.
Players purposely standing out of bounds in order to deceive the opposition into thinking that said player is not active.
Players purposely standing out of bounds in order to deceive the opposition into thinking that said player is not active.
I think that is why the rule states he's can't be the first to touch the ball after he comes back in.
Everything about the clock or being in or out of bounds should be reviewable. The one thing I do not want is for them to call fouls based on replay. Those need to be called live or not at all.
I Didn't notice if that was the intent there. If so that should be a technically foul and at least terrible sportsmanship by the other player/coach.
I think non-judgement-call things should be reviewable in the final minute, both calls and non-calls. Out of bounds, shot clock, back court violation, travel, goaltending, last touch, etc. If it's a judgement call (foul yes/no, block/charge, carry, etc) that shouldn't be subject to overturning on review.
The question is what triggers the review. You can say "out of bounds in final X seconds" or "whistles in final X seconds" or whatever as a trigger... but how do you trigger with no call. Might need to give coaches the discretion to request review in certain situations.
The question is what triggers the review. You can say "out of bounds in final X seconds" or "whistles in final X seconds" or whatever as a trigger... but how do you trigger with no call. Might need to give coaches the discretion to request review in certain situations.
Disagree on reviewing fouls but reviewing whether the player was inbounds should not even be a debate. Cannot even comprehend they didn't review it last night
Similar threads
