ADVERTISEMENT

GAME 3 MONMOUTH: Yes they can score but....

Giving up 81 to Monmouth and being down to St. Peter’s with 4 minutes left are concerning whether you admit it or not. Yes the team should improve but these first three games shows this team isn’t a big ten title contender right now.
We have 9 new players and 3 true freshman playing a ton of minutes. What did yo think the games were going to look like in November and December?
 
I think the reality is somewhere in between "no defense, lets panic" and "freshman growing pains". As others have said, we can't outscore every team in every game. However, the fact that we can use our scoring to overcome deficits and generate excitement to cue a home game comeback is very positive. We're also going to need defensive stands at times and I think we've shown an ability to do it when needed.

The young kids (including Dylan and Ace) are getting a harsh lesson in the upgraded talent level and intensity of college basketball. Dylan has looked winded many times during his first 3 games and Ace cramping up is a sign of a lack of preparation on his part. I also think they will be fine and it's a lesson that needs to be learned. Same goes for the defensive intensity. Allowing backdoor cuts, poor box outs - they can be fixed. The question is, "can they be fixed quickly enough to make this a special season?"

I agree with Bac when he says this team has to grow up fast. I think this team will be a tremendous tournament team when it's all said and done. The question is, can we win enough games to get to the point to make that meaningful? I'm saying....yes.
 
The problem Rutgers faces on defense is the number of new players who aren't used to playing together and at least six will be gone next season.Teaching switching man to man defenses to players that are primarily offensively focused is a big challenge which is why I favor more zone defense with this roster.Its easier to learn and players aren't as tired defending players all over the court.This Rutgers team will win games with a high scoring offense similar to Iowa in previous seasons.The ability to hold opponents to less than 70 points will be a real challenge.Bottom line Rutgers should win at least 20 games and get a NCAA bid.
 
I think J Will makes a big difference on defense but unfortunately might actually disrupt the offensive flow which I will admit was impressive last night

Need a 4th data point but with him and Ace banged up plus the lesser middling competition level, its tough to get a real evaluation of our teams peak performance on both sides of the ball.
Jwill is not a plus defender, slides and falls all over the place, basket hangs after bad plays while not getting back. Considering he gives us Zero offensively with this team because he can’t have the ball. Hopefully we can find him a transfer school.
 
Jwill is not a plus defender, slides and falls all over the place, basket hangs after bad plays while not getting back. Considering he gives us Zero offensively with this team because he can’t have the ball. Hopefully we can find him a transfer school.
Maybe before we kick him to the curb this season, we can find a role for him to fit in on this team first. Yikes.
 
Hawk, tries to go to extremes and never finds the middle. To say you have no concern for the defense or rebounding is putting your head in the sand.
On any night we play , we will have the 2 best players on the court. Our offense can score , can score a lot , as seen can share the ball, and when it finds the right guys on kick out threes, like PJ and Martini , and uses the low post for easy scoring with Lathan , the best offensive center since Bailey, we are wonderful to watch and can hang 90 to 100 on anyone. That will win us a lot of games.
However, you do not have to take it to extremes , and play almost no defense for a half. Good or acceptable defense leads to good offense which will definitely be true with our team this year . It wasn’t just Bashir having a career night , it was every other less talented player on Monmouth getting whatever shot they wanted that was disturbing. We could have won that game 98-67 with even a modicum of defense. That is all that is required to be a really successful team this year. Don’t bury your heads in the sand and not think it is a concern , which it is , but at the same time very hopeful that Pike can fix most of the bad defense . This game is a teaching tape .
My main concern is Ace’s health , as he seemed to aggravate his hip flexor and either was cramping or had a hamstring issue. It was obvious to me he was hurting all night as he could not move freely , could not bend for balls or dribbling or could not reach for balls or rebounding , but still did what he did. We need him healthy for Vegas and beyond.
 
Jwill is not a plus defender, slides and falls all over the place, basket hangs after bad plays while not getting back. Considering he gives us Zero offensively with this team because he can’t have the ball. Hopefully we can find him a transfer school.
lol and yet Pike made him a captain.. must have happened because he has no redeeming basketball qualities. Board continues to have ridiculous takes.
 
This game was FOOL’S GOLD. We took a step backwards today.
Some truth to this

Capsulized by one play - Monmouth inbounding ball under their own hoop in second half, I think was Somerville was had by the oldest inbounds play int he book, literally an 8th grade play - fake screen where appears to try and free shooter running out towards elbow, and simply spins around catches pass vs defender who is cheating and defending the screen, not the player. Layup. It was embarrassing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
He's going to need to show a lot more to earn those minutes. He seems to have regressed. Dude couldn't even inbound the ball undefended last night. I suppose if you just want someone to go in and deliver fouls he's your man.
I think (don't know for sure) he can still do more than that.
 
Some truth to this

Capsulized by one play - Monmouth inbounding ball under their own hoop in second half, I think was Somerville was had by the oldest inbounds play int he book, literally an 8th grade play - fake screen where appears to try and free shooter running out towards elbow, and simply spins around catches pass vs defender who is cheating and defending the screen, not the player. Layup. It was embarrassing.
To me is fool's gold is when you win but you shoot way better than you normally do. I realize we got quality looks, but how many points do we score if we adjust our shooting for normal.

We had posts last game people worried about the poor shooting. I am more worried when the opposite happened. Shooting is everything, but the results don't always reflect the looks you get and how you played.

There were also possessions (not many) I thought the D was good and Monmouth made a tough basket.
 
I will reserve judgment on defense etc until I see the full plan implemented.

We have yet to see Pike press. We have yet to see 1-3-1 zone, or really any switching defensive schemes.

Pike is rightfully implementing things slowly because of youth and so many new players.
 
Rutgers gave up 51 points to a bad Monmouth team in ONE half. Monmouth shot 27, 29, and 31 I think in its 3 previous games. The D was painfully bad last night. It was subpar against St Peters. It was obvious the reason for the St Johns loss. Wisconsin and Purdue are playing high scoring games against top 5 schools not Monmouth

The 3 Vegas games are coming up followed by a trip to Ohio State fast. Team is going to have to grow up fast.

Thats the question I take from last night. Our center position is a glaring weakness on D. Our perimeter defense is alwats susceptible to being burned. Can those things be fixed before that 4 game gauntlet...or even is this high octane offense even capable of lock down defense and will we rely solely on just overpowering our opponents

Dont think my thread is bizarre or an overreaction and if you think I am writing the season off you are wrong too but I need to feel a smidgeon of defense. These players are only here for a year with off the chart expectations. The usual 4 years of growth and experience is condensed into a very short period of time
Agree 100%, as I said in the rapid reaction thread. Not looking for lockdown defense, per se, but the ole defense of last night's 2nd half just won't cut it against better teams that our offense, as good as it is, probably won't be able to score at will against (unlike Monmouth). We're going to win a lot of games and against some good teams and it's going to be very entertaining, but I doubt we become a top team without at least somewhat better defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
We have2 guys with Jordanesque, ability it’s an embarrassment of riches.
I have concerns on what I am seeing on how we run our offense, and our discipline on defense.
Even Jordan as well as Kobe benefited from well designed offensive sets
Rutgers could benefit from more
Structure, on Offense
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
Did Monmouth ever close the lead to single digits in the second half? I don't remember I never felt like were losing that game.
 
Hawk, tries to go to extremes and never finds the middle. To say you have no concern for the defense or rebounding is putting your head in the sand.
On any night we play , we will have the 2 best players on the court. Our offense can score , can score a lot , as seen can share the ball, and when it finds the right guys on kick out threes, like PJ and Martini , and uses the low post for easy scoring with Lathan , the best offensive center since Bailey, we are wonderful to watch and can hang 90 to 100 on anyone. That will win us a lot of games.
However, you do not have to take it to extremes , and play almost no defense for a half. Good or acceptable defense leads to good offense which will definitely be true with our team this year . It wasn’t just Bashir having a career night , it was every other less talented player on Monmouth getting whatever shot they wanted that was disturbing. We could have won that game 98-67 with even a modicum of defense. That is all that is required to be a really successful team this year. Don’t bury your heads in the sand and not think it is a concern , which it is , but at the same time very hopeful that Pike can fix most of the bad defense . This game is a teaching tape .
My main concern is Ace’s health , as he seemed to aggravate his hip flexor and either was cramping or had a hamstring issue. It was obvious to me he was hurting all night as he could not move freely , could not bend for balls or dribbling or could not reach for balls or rebounding , but still did what he did. We need him healthy for Vegas and beyond.
I'm not concerned....it's mid November.

It takes years to fine-tune a roster......fine tune defensive rotations.... there's scouting involved.

I am not under any illusion that PJ Hayes, Zach Martini and 3 freshman are dominant defensive players. Can they play better?? Maybe, but we have better options to go to for defense and rebounding.

IF, fans want elite defense and better rebounding, sit down Zach Martini and PJ Hayes and play the length, size and better speed and rebounding of Dylan Grant and more JWill at guard.

I would include Bryce Dortch as a plus or lengthy defender, who can bother shooting from opponents.

If you want to play effort, rebounding and defense, prepare to sacrifice offense and scoring and make life even more difficult on Dylan, Ace and Lathan to score 50 to 60 PPG and hope JWill, JMike, Derkack and others fill in the gaps until Grant and Dortch get up to speed......or hope JMike, JWill and Derkack become scorers and shooters at Martini, Hayes level??

There's no perfect roster and there's balance involved. Right now, I am VERY comfortable that the defense gets better vs asking JWill, JMike and Derkack become complete 28 to 30 minutes a game players that score 10PPG each.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAC93
Did Monmouth ever close the lead to single digits in the second half? I don't remember I never felt like were losing that game.
No. Got it to 11. Then pike started waving his hands and it was over. Never felt like we were losing either. But was pretty frustrated in the second half
 
No music?
2024 A Sp”Ace” Odyssey?
Ace of Baseline?
Space Ace Bailey?

Another game without all three starters.
Still won going away.
Yes defense is a concern but also pretty clear by evident of plus 17/18 last week that it is JWill who is our best defensive player and he was missing.
Still concerning we allowed one player to go off and now three consecutive games where opposition shot lights out on threes.
I’m not in panic mode yet with D. Just a new way of playing.
I am concerned that RU players do seem to be more winded than past years.
We won a game at the line. That’s encouraging and we hit threes.
Martini and Derdack were very good.
Dylan was amazing self and Ace while clearly not 100 percent showed the glimpses of being as good as advertised.
Little bit of rest now as only one game in a week so hopefully Pike turns up the coaching.
In past years these games have been bad losses or struggles.
Think we are on schedule.
 
I think the reality is somewhere in between "no defense, lets panic" and "freshman growing pains". As others have said, we can't outscore every team in every game. However, the fact that we can use our scoring to overcome deficits and generate excitement to cue a home game comeback is very positive. We're also going to need defensive stands at times and I think we've shown an ability to do it when needed.

The young kids (including Dylan and Ace) are getting a harsh lesson in the upgraded talent level and intensity of college basketball. Dylan has looked winded many times during his first 3 games and Ace cramping up is a sign of a lack of preparation on his part. I also think they will be fine and it's a lesson that needs to be learned. Same goes for the defensive intensity. Allowing backdoor cuts, poor box outs - they can be fixed. The question is, "can they be fixed quickly enough to make this a special season?"

I agree with Bac when he says this team has to grow up fast. I think this team will be a tremendous tournament team when it's all said and done. The question is, can we win enough games to get to the point to make that meaningful? I'm saying....yes.
well said....i panicked after the St John's scrimmage and 3 games later Harper is a completely different player on the defensive end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rhuarc
We have2 guys with Jordanesque, ability it’s an embarrassment of riches.
I have concerns on what I am seeing on how we run our offense, and our discipline on defense.
Even Jordan as well as Kobe benefited from well designed offensive sets
Rutgers could benefit from more
Structure, on Offense
We scored 98 points on 70 possessions (+28 in my book). This is the wrong game for this.....plus it isn't true.

....and they aren't Jordanesque...more like Grant Hill and Kevin Durant
 
We have 9 new players and 3 true freshman playing a ton of minutes. What did yo think the games were going to look like in November and December?
Lol stop with the excuses. Maryland has the same transition and is beating teams by 50. If I told we’d be losing to St. Peter’s with 4 minutes left before the season you would have called me a Rutgers haters.
 
We have SIX players shooting between 50-60% from the floor, reminiscent of the 20-21 season starting off offensively hot, but this team has a higher ceiling because of chemistry. I don't see a potential fight for lead guard the way 20-21 went downhill quick from 6-0, 7-1 to 14-10 but did recover to almost make the Sweet 16.

Martini FG 12-20 60%, 3pt 7-14 50%
PJ Hayes FG 9-15 60%, 3pt 6-11 54.5%
Derkack FG 7-12 58.3%, 2pt 7-9 77.8%
D. Harper 23-40 57.5%, 2pt 19-27 70.4%
Sommerville FG 13-23 56.5%, 1-1 3pt
Bailey FG 5-10 50%
JWill 6-13 46.2%, JMike 6-14 42.9%
Ogbole 2-4, Acuff 3-10
Acuff is still trying to work his way back to form.

Is the defense sorted yet, no, there are spurts of it thru 3, but the ceiling on this team is pretty high when the defense catches up to the offense without losing much on the offensive side. Princeton is more offensive than defensive, San Diego, Eastern Michigan not much defense, Derkack is the only one that has a reputation for defense, along with JWill and JMike. They will be the keys to get the rest on board playing defense.
 
Pump the brakes on the chemistry part....yes, for the most part, chemistry is great. We have older guys that are very good for the younger guys. Dercack and Harper seem to be very tight on the court.

Let's revisit after hopefully we are fully healthy and some guys lose minutes. Also I expect to lose once or twice.

I think chemistry is important, but it is too early. We will win if we can be a Top 25 offensive team and a Top 50 defensiveteam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
will this group be committed to playing the type of defense that gets big stops in big spots?

As impressive and at times scintillating the offense would look in the first half, a very unimpressive 2nd half defensive effort where arguably Monmouth outplayed RU changed my whole thinking on this recap. Scoring 98 a new Pikiell high I think while you are already taken for granted how awesome your two superstar players are and you are getting contributions from everyone else including a freshmen center would normally produce a lot of positive vibes. Yet I find myself unable to get move off tonights defensive performance...and actually the defensive performance the past two games. Both games RU has allowed its opponents to come in and get into a comfort zone shooting the ball mainly from the perimeter. St Peters put up 42 in the first half last game and finished 10-27 from 3 but started I think 7-15. In that game one guy Randolph particularly was able to stay hot going 7-12 fg, 4-8 3pt fg for 22 points. Tonight, Bashir was unstoppable going for 38 points on 11-23 shooting including a whopping 10-17 from 3 and the Hawks overall were 10-29 but 9-20 at one point. Yes he was incredibly hot and yes the defense was basically giving him everything. It was just too easy and when Bashir was not shooting, there seemed to be too many guys easily getting the ball near the rim or taking uncontested shots. I cannot remember a Pikiell team laying off so much defensively and being so pourous. To give up 51 points to this version of Monmouth in one half, come on guys.

The most damning run came at when RU went up 67-45 but then proceeding to allow a 23-12 run over a 7 minute stretch. Further in was a 10-1 run by Monmouth over 3 minutes that cut the lead to just 79-68 and made us all adjust ourselves in our seats. It was a tough watch because the Rutgers offense was stumbling and bumbling for the first time this game. Obviously Ace was hurting after his earlier dunk play and landed on the floor again after being fouled, he missed both free throws. RU passing was sloppy with a stretch of 4 turnovers and perhaps the wrong people touching the ball. I thought a little too much forcing it to Summerville and dare I say Rutgers actually looked gassed and lethargic for a time. Not unlike how they did vs St Johns in the exhibition game. Obviously a better team there and they were not able to withstand the Red Storms run but to me this stretch felt similar.

In this particularly game RU was never really in danger of losing it but you want to see the D show some lock down moments and while its hard to say being up 16-20 isnt good enough, RU missed on opportunties to truly blow it opened. Seemed like they kept leaving Monmouth hanging around rather than put the nail in their coffin. Hopefully a teaching moment for Pike. He called timeout when they lead got cut to 11 and did at least go back to putting the ball back in the hands of guys who Monmouth could not guard and Dylan and Ace were able to draw fouls and hit a bunch of free throws to give RU some breathing space. A key play by Zak Martini on defense I think was the death knell for Monmouth and unsurprisingly it was Zak who also stepped up with a couple of buckets in the closing minutes and to me was the all around player of the game for RU with 18 points in 26 minutes on 7-10 fg and 4-7 from 3

It sucks that Ace may have got banged up again. Hopefully not serious. He came out right way with that 3 and hit a couple of scintilllating shots that only a NBA talent can make with regularity. 5-10 fg but 6-8 ft, 6 boards, 2 steals in 30 minutes. Pick your poison if you are attempting to guard Rutgers. For about 30 minutes of this game RU could pick their shot. Harper maybe a bit quiet in the first half but came out strutting his stuff with a quick 6 points in the opening minutes of the 2nd half. Another 20 point game on 6-9 fg shooting with 6 boards but got others involved with 6 assists and some of them were beauts. Derkack such a tough distributor with 9 assists tonight including a highlight reel one to J Mike. Also tough on the boards with 6. I will say his defense wasnt great on the perimeter though. Lathan continues to impress with his skills. 10 points on 4-8 fg with 7 boards. Some great signs from him however he is asked to do too much. There was a key stretch for me in the 2nd half where I think Pike was asking too much from him and was hurting the offense. Tough situation because its obvious Ogobole cannot play for more than a few minutes each half. Solid minutes from both Hayes and Davis playing their roles. Hayes with 11 points and 3-4 from 3 in 22 minutes and Davis with 9 showing fearlessness to the hoop and perhaps the best defensive player on the team.

Now in fairness no Jeremiah Williams tonight. At first I did not notice. In the first half the offense was clicking without him and the defense was holding its own. However by games end I realize yeah we need J Will because he just provides something on D that we will not get from Ace or Dylan or for anyone else for that matter. Yet I am not confident this is a good defensive team or it is capable of being a good defensive team. Will the strategy be "let the offense run and roll" and hope that is enough. In non conference games it is. It likely will be enough in some of the Big 10 conference games. It will not be enough in the top half of the league and that is your difference between being a top 4 seed in the NCAA or a 10 seed or even a bubble team. Now its just a small 3 game data point that we have and I do not want to rush in judgments. Merrimack will not tell us much but I wouldnt be surprised if we do see a more concerted focus on D before RU heads out on the road. Going to be a challenge for Pikiell. This is a different type of team with different type of players. There is so much to be excited about but there is still so much to work to for them to fulfill all of the promise we are dreaming about.
Spot on Bac. Lots to like offensively, especially the assists and sharing the game. But, I never felt worse about a 17-point victory because of the terrible second half defense!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greene Rice FIG
Pump the brakes on the chemistry part....yes, for the most part, chemistry is great. We have older guys that are very good for the younger guys. Dercack and Harper seem to be very tight on the court.

Let's revisit after hopefully we are fully healthy and some guys lose minutes. Also I expect to lose once or twice.

I think chemistry is important, but it is too early. We will win if we can be a Top 25 offensive team and a Top 50 defensiveteam.
Let's hope an Ohio St meltdown doesn't happen, from 48-32 to 68-80 on the Bingo card this year, at least Bo Boroski is retired.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Greene Rice FIG
No. Got it to 11. Then pike started waving his hands and it was over. Never felt like we were losing either. But was pretty frustrated in the second half
Yea and ultimately we didn’t cover against Monmouth in a high possession game and we were in a dogfight against St. Peter’s. For all the encouraging signs on offense and potential outlier Monmouth shooting of last night, the MOV shit is really important in non-conference play and we’re hurting our standing there.
 
The recap and complaints about defense are bizarre....and makes no sense at all.

In recent years, we all have watched plenty of North Carolina, Duke, Wake Forest, Kansas, Arizona, Michigan State, Purdue, Kentucky and plenty of ranked schools or "offense first" programs.....and games get played in 70s and low 80s most times.

MOST programs who are trying to win, have to have an ability to match "basket for basket".

We have played with mostly limited skilled, limited shooting and incomplete basketball players for most of the Pike Era and we can name maybe RU 7 to 8 complete basketball players in this era (dribble, pass, create, shooting and improvise scoring, when a defense is winning a 1 on 1 battle).....

Most of this era would have made St Peters a dogfight and maybe a Derek Simpson or Mawot Mag or another incomplete offensive player BUT stronger defensive player slows down Randolph of St Peters or doesn't allow Bashir 17 3 point attempts....but Randolph is still going to score points and maybe Bashir doesn't get 17 3s if Simpson or Mag type of player is playing 30+ minutes, but it's maybe 11 3s....??

In either case, A Simpson or Mag non-scoring/non shooting threats aren't offsetting Bashir or Randolph hitting shots, so this game would be a 5 point nailbiting game and it's 77-72 RU instead of cruising to a 98-81 RU victory.

This transition of how RU would play started LAST year and it only showed up with a flickering light in a few games, but the style and pushing the pace was being showcased.....it Just lacked the offensive creative players or finishers and lacked the spot up shooting to compliment the guards.

PJ Hayes......Zach Martini.....Lathan Sommerville, Ace, Dylan.....they're scorers, creative players and willing passers....why on earth would we whine about defense on Bashir, when we are 2 missed layups and a bizarre layup taken away from JMike Davis, from 6 more points and 104 on the board??

We CAN decide to play like the methodical, 65-62 types of games, but there's no Ace Bailey, Dylan Harper or 4 2025 HS recruits, signing up for that. We can just play the more athletic Dylan Grant or Bryce Dortch with Ogbole, run the shot clock down and ask Dylan and Ace to manufacture 50 points by themselves and wait for those 2 freshman to figure out how to score, rebound AND defend on the job......

OR take our chances with Zach Martini, PJ Hayes and Lathan Sommerville to learn how the rotations work on defense, while keeping the pressure on defenses and help Dylan and Ace, play to their strengths, of driving, scoring and keeping the lanes clear.

It is a new era of basketball and I am certainly willing to take my chances that Martini, Hayes, Sommerville improve on defense while maintaining their high offensive skills, vs asking limited players to score 12 to 14 points with lock down defense 30 games in a season.

it is more likely that opponents like Randolph and Bashir don't have career rights. You just cant win, unless you score points. RUs evolution towards offensively skilled and creative players with freedom to improvise......and away from limited offensive players who can only play defense, started last year and is in full swing this year......get used to it!!!
It’s not the amount of points we gave up that is concerning. It’s allowing a low level, offensively challenged team to come into the RAC and shoot 45% from three with 13 makes that is a red flag!
 
Yea and ultimately we didn’t cover against Monmouth in a high possession game and we were in a dogfight against St. Peter’s. For all the encouraging signs on offense and potential outlier Monmouth shooting of last night, the MOV shit is really important in non-conference play and we’re hurting our standing there.
actually tempo was 70 possessions....not that uptempo
 
Foolish statement. Adding Ace was a step forward. The ingredients there for the first time. The recipe will everyone and be developed
if you think we will be 11-20 from 3 and 25-32 from 1 most nights it isn't.

I am the 1st guy when we shoot poorly to say it isn't as bad as it looks.

Normalize our shooting and what do you get.....
7-20 from 3 or 35% (-12 points)
23-32 from 1 or 71.9% (-2 points)

-14 points
 
Last edited:
To me is fool's gold is when you win but you shoot way better than you normally do. I realize we got quality looks, but how many points do we score if we adjust our shooting for normal.

We had posts last game people worried about the poor shooting. I am more worried when the opposite happened. Shooting is everything, but the results don't always reflect the looks you get and how you played.

There were also possessions (not many) I thought the D was good and Monmouth made a tough basket.

There were reasons why they shot well. Ball movement was incredible and led to open looks and less forced shots. On top of that, the right players were shooting the right shots. Hayes, Martini, Harper, Bailey, and Acuff (I think he’ll be a quality shooter) shot 19 of the 20 threes and went 11-19 (57.9%). Against Wagner, the other players shot 8 threes and went 1-8.
 
  • Like
Reactions: winfield102
There were reasons why they shot well. Ball movement was incredible and led to open looks and less forced shots. On top of that, the right players were shooting the right shots. Hayes, Martini, Harper, Bailey, and Acuff (I think he’ll be a quality shooter) shot 19 of the 20 threes and went 11-19 (57.9%). Against Wagner, the other players shot 8 threes and went 1-8.
thats why my baseline was 35% and not 30%.

you kind of made my point though with the 1-8. wagner was the opposite of fool gold
 
Lots of thoughts and some of them include concerns about defense, but I’ll sum it up fairly simply.

I’d rather have a predictably efficient offense who we can rely on the put up points each game while Pike teaches better defense over the course of the year.

Certainly preferably to a strong reliable defensive team that Pike has to try to teach offense.
 
A little too much gloom and doom on here, people with concerns about Ace’s health make it sound like he is going in for an MRI today on a potential ACL tear or something…..chill……R-E-L-A-X…...he had cramps. If the defense looks like this in mid January then this team’s ceiling will be limited. However, it is still mid November. Everything @bac2therac pointed out in the recap as usual was a great summation of the game, spot on. I am fully confident that this type of defense is not acceptable with Pike. However, I think people may have unrealistic expectations if they expect this team to be a top 10 or top 20 defense. Can they and should they look better than the second half on defense last night? Absolutely, 100% agreed. But, the offense is going to drive the bus when it comes to winning this season and the defense is just along for the ride. This is not a team that grinds out 63-61 rock fight wins on a regular basis (and Amen to that).

I said the same type of things while watching the second half “where is the defensive intensity?” “Pike can’t be happy right now with this defense and effort”. Give them time but if the expectation is for this group to be a lockdown, shutdown, speed limit defense then that is just unrealistic. They need to improve and need more consistent effort, focus, and intensity on defense but just realize this is an offense first team and some may never be happy with the defense.
 
Jwill is not a plus defender, slides and falls all over the place, basket hangs after bad plays while not getting back. Considering he gives us Zero offensively with this team because he can’t have the ball. Hopefully we can find him a transfer school.
I don't like this take at all. Jwill can give us something on both ends of the floor. I know everybody is Gaga over Derkack right now, but I wasn't gaga with him at St. Johns - I felt he looked overmatched at times. Derkack has looked great against the cupcakes, but they are leaving after this week and will be replaced by real comp - let's see how impactful he is against high D1 guards. Selling on Jwill right now is the wrong approach for so many reasons - we will need him no matter how things go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cm_13
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT