ThisI'd wait to hear the status of Wes Lunt before I passed judgement.
You mean it's not the 14-20 points some posters here were swearing it would be?
You are crazy because they do allow him to throw the ball but he won't pull the trigger. Plus see my post above.I think if Ash/Mehringer allow Laviano (or, whomever will be the QB) to actually throw the ball, we might generate some actual offense. Am I crazy for actually thinking this?
Laviano was able to throw the ball last year (in a different offense, I know). Not well, of course. But, he can throw.
Wait til Saturday around 3:30 and we will see then if "they" are right or not.
Wow I am surprised that the line is that low after our offensive performance last week. I think that Laviano, Martin and Harris will have good games against this team. It should be a great game!
They would be around an 8.5 favorite at home.
If we're being honest, the line is way too low. I could easily see us losing 24-7 or something like that.
Same here. I could also see us winning by the same score. Illinois isn't loaded with "quality athletes," either, so maybe, just maybe, we get off the HC "schneid" here.
the illinois offense got better with the backup. lunt was 4-9 42 yards. the backup was 10-14 142 yards and ran the ball 17 times for 137 yards 2td. even if healthy doubt lunt starts.I'd wait to hear the status of Wes Lunt before I passed judgement.
You want Lunt to play rather than backup. The backup is very mobile, Lunt not so much. Lunt has a bigger arm but is a statue. Both will play even if Lunt is healthy. They use backup to run spread option stuff in red zone and he is good in short passing game.
The 2 DE's are very very good. As in best in Big 10 good. Your tackles will be pressed. They get to the QB in a hurry.
Won't one of the DE's miss the 1st half due to a targeting hit and ejection last week?
Our team is gonna have PTSD after the past two weeks, this line should be -10 minimum
No they wouldn't. The best teams, with the best HFA's, are 5-point. Illinois, like RU, probably gets a 3-point HFA. Spread would have started at Illinois - 5.5 there IMHO.
----We'll win this game if we play TO and stick to the run game.
---I called zero points the last two weeks and I am calling it again. Until we prove otherwise scoring is not in the cards.
I called zero points the last two weeks and I am calling it again. Until we prove otherwise scoring is not in the cards.
1. Was Iowa game that far in the past?
2. Does Illinois have game changing weapons?
I don't know answer to #2.
If something looks to good to be true it usually is. I am expecting a rutgers win. Maybe I am delusional.
Naield it again. Told you guys it'd be right around 3. Those who were saying 20... LO FVCKING L
seems about right. Im in utter disgust by Saturday. Seeing 39 total yards made me cringe.
I'll take this bet. We are not going to be shut out by Illinois.
If we are, I'll shut up and change my handle to RU#2fan or Plump Street or something.