There wasn't one Frank Burns coached team from 1974 till his retirement that would not have manhandled the team you see out there today.
That's right, we were far better 35 years ago
That's right, we were far better 35 years ago
the only thing this staff can run is the program into the groundFrank Burns would never try to run an offense as dumb as the "power spread". Not in New Jersey.
Hobb's hired a BBcoach with proven HC experience , he takes over a joke of a team, and it's pays off immediately.
Yet he hired as HC for football a guy who never was a HC in HS, or D2, let alone P5, yet not only hires him to a long term contract, but allows him to hire an unproven staff that is in way over their heads.
Hobb's has a big problem on his hands.
There wasn't one Frank Burns coached team from 1974 till his retirement that would not have manhandled the team you see out there today.
That's right, we were far better 35 years ago
-----------I must agree with all of you Frank Burns was a dam good coach. The kid on the side lines has no clue of what he's doing. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the talent is not here to run a power spread. I feel terrible for the kids. Phil Knight would have Barchi, Hobbs and 1/2 the BOT replaced.
Please do and find it quicklySMH...About time to find another hobby
Mike Rice had experience. EJ had experience on the NBA level. How did those work out. BTW there were plenty who were not happy with the Pikiell hire thinking we were cheap and hiring "only" the Stony Brook coach. I had no issues with it just like I had no issues with Ash even though neither was on the top of my list. I know you can get good coaches from those pools of candidates. You can also get failures.Hobb's hired a BBcoach with proven HC experience , he takes over a joke of a team, and it's pays off immediately.
Yet he hired as HC for football a guy who never was a HC in HS, or D2, let alone P5, yet not only hires him to a long term contract, but allows him to hire an unproven staff that is in way over their heads.
Hobb's has a big problem on his hands.
There wasn't one Frank Burns coached team from 1974 till his retirement that would not have manhandled the team you see out there today.
That's right, we were far better 35 years ago
What is your motivation in blaming the players rather than the coaches, who collectively at best, are inexperienced and learning on the job. Hope you noticed the HC pacing on the sidelines during the second half. Reminded me of last year.I watch the entire game starting in the 2nd quarter. But this time I didn't watch the game like I usually do - bird's eye view and just see what happens.
This his time I fixated on one player a snap.
I am astounded by how bad most of the players are on this team. I am sorry to be calling them out, but it is as plain as day.
The DE converted to offensive RT was getting tourched every single play. He couldn't get out of his stance. His feet didn't move. The rest of them weren't much better.
We don't have one QB worth a damn. Pathetic
WRs????? They are the size of hobits to ZERO speed.
The DLine is grossly undersized so they can't protect our LBers - so they are getting blown up EVER F'in play creating massive holes where our safeties are leading tacklers. SMH
This roster couldn't compete for a playoff spot in Div 2.
Then throw a staff looking to run the spread. I don't have an obersvation here.
I am getting f'in tired of being associated with the program and people around me abusing me for it.
What do you want him to do?What is your motivation in blaming the players rather than the coaches, who collectively at best, are inexperienced and learning on the job. Hope you noticed the HC pacing on the sidelines during the second half. Reminded me of last year.
-----------
Burns was forced to run our program with what some recruits called a high school facility..... he was a loyal son
the next coach started to get some stadium upgrades and a bit more support....something Burns could have used as a
recruiting tool himself
I know that you are aware that Frank's problems started when the AD upgraded his schedule without upgrading the facilities. Better facilities would have allowed Frank to bring in more of the High Level Players that were needed to compete with the better teams.He did wonders with what he had but didn't have the horses he needed to stay in the race.A Great Coach and a Great Person.Tough as nails and ALWAYS a Gentleman.-----------
Burns was forced to run our program with what some recruits called a high school facility..... he was a loyal son
the next coach started to get some stadium upgrades and a bit more support....something Burns could have used as a
recruiting tool himself
Schiano was technically Mulcahy's 3rd choice-the top two choices didn't want the job.That's the risk we take when we let someone cut their teeth as a first time (at ANY level) head coach. You are taking risk doing this at the Big 10 level. And yes Schiano was a first timer too, but we were a fledgling power 5 team that had very low expectations so he was given a lot of early slack. Two other first timers we gambled on we're Flood and Fred Hill Jr ( both were in over their heads as first time HC's). I hope I'm wrong about Ash.
If you told me that Charlie Strong wanted this job I would fire Ash in a New York second. I probably would have done it even before the season started and we knew Ash's warts. That guy can coach....
I could name plenty of college football coaches with HC experience from the mid majors and even P5 level who haven't worked out too. Just look at Charlie Strong at Texas.
...
Excellent post. An honest account of what transpired towards the end of his coaching tenure at Rutgers. Without the upgrades to the facilities he could not attract better talent and still with this disadvantage they upgraded his schedule to play Cuse, Pitt, PSU and I believe Miami. Yes indeed he was a true gentleman.I know that you are aware that Frank's problems started when the AD upgraded his schedule without upgrading the facilities. Better facilities would have allowed Frank to bring in more of the High Level Players that were needed to compete with the better teams.He did wonders with what he had but didn't have the horses he needed to stay in the race.A Great Coach and a Great Person.Tough as nails and ALWAYS a Gentleman.
Just a reply to this part..Mike Rice could recruit and coach. The issue with him was his wacko behavior. EJ was not a college coach as noted and as many were concerned didn't fit (AT ALL) the college game.Mike Rice had experience. EJ had experience on the NBA level. How did those work out. BTW there were plenty who were not happy with the Pikiell hire thinking we were cheap and hiring "only" the Stony Brook coach. I had no issues with it just like I had no issues with Ash even though neither was on the top of my list. I know you can get good coaches from those pools of candidates. You can also get failures.
.
Who were the first two?Schiano was technically Mulcahy's 3rd choice-the top two choices didn't want the job.
Is he bringing Bridgewater with him?If you told me that Charlie Strong wanted this job I would fire Ash in a New York second. I probably would have done it even before the season started and we knew Ash's warts. That guy can coach.
lol...if Ash keeps losing, how is he going to get better talent? He certainly can't coach up so how in the hell is the next guy getting a better cuppard?????it will take 3-4 years to turn over the roster. that puts us into 2919 until we really see what the hell is going on. if we can get lucky and recruit that one kid who is a program changer,that process can occur faster. in the meantime, we should be supportive and be part of the solution of our dilemma. give the guy a chance. if he doesn't work out, the next guy will at least be in a better position with regard to talent level and culture in the program.
Mike Rice had experience. EJ had experience on the NBA level. How did those work out. BTW there were plenty who were not happy with the Pikiell hire thinking we were cheap and hiring "only" the Stony Brook coach. I had no issues with it just like I had no issues with Ash even though neither was on the top of my list. I know you can get good coaches from those pools of candidates. You can also get failures.
I could name plenty of college football coaches with HC experience from the mid majors and even P5 level who haven't worked out too. Just look at Charlie Strong at Texas. Jimbo Fisher had no experience as an HC and he won a national championship. Mark Richt has been good and he was only a coordinator too. There are other too who I have named in the past.
I did this during the hiring process too. You can get successes and failures from both pools of candidates. Many mid major coaches succeed and many fail, same for coordinators without HC experience. There's really no pattern to it to say one pool is better than the other. It's up to the AD to try and identify who the right candidate is and that's easier said then done.
People always throw around that "proven" term and there's no such thing outside of a select few like Meyer, Saban and maybe a few others. One coaching situation to the next is different and the step up to a HC is a big one whether it be from the mid majors or coordinator spot and not everyone will thrive everywhere. So it all depends depends on finding the right fit and the right guy for your job and that's up to the AD, like I said easier said than done though.
Gary Darnell Western Michigan's HC at the time and Mark Whipple who was Massachusetts head coach , I think were the twoWho were the first two?