Oklahoma men get in despite winning two games since January, good news for us?

[MGSA99]

Shows the NCAAs are looking at the full body of work and not how you are playing recently. Could be good news for us.

 

[RUTrack94]

No ... is the $ooner$ ... all about the money!!!!

 

[BeKnighted]

The women's committee doesn't look at exactly the same things as the men's committee, but I'd still say it's a hopeful sign.

 

[RUTrack94]

The women's committee doesn't look at exactly the same things as the men's committee, but I'd still say it's a hopeful sign.

RRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!’

 

[rutgersron]

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!

 

[DennisHajekRC84]

Apparently the two committees got together and added the ok. mens and womens to average them out to get them both in.

 

[bac2therac]

mens and womens use different criteria

 

[RUClassof67]

Apparently the Oklahoma men getting in with a bad record down the stretch was good news for the Oklahoma women!!! :angry::weary:

 

[bac2therac]

Apparently the Oklahoma men getting in with a bad record down the stretch was good news for the Oklahoma women!!! :angry::weary:

if they used the same criteria, RU would be in and Oklahoma would be out

 

[fischy5000]

if they used the same criteria, RU would be in and Oklahoma would be out

seems like it would make too much sense to use the same criteria across Mens and Womens.

 

[bac2therac]

seems like it would make too much sense to use the same criteria across Mens and Womens.

the women's committee is actually leading the way here

 

[fischy5000]

i dont mind that part. I just think it should be consistent across both M & W regardless of which way they go----end of season trend vs full body of work.