Another great game that ends with the idiotic coaching decision of going for 2 when the consequence of failure means losing the game. Someone inevitably will counter with "yeah but if they convert then they win," to which my counterargument is if they have that kind of confidence in their 2-point conversions, then why not go for them all the time? After all, even if you fail 50% of the time, you're still breaking even and that's assuming your kicker never misses an extra point.
Now in this particular game, the decision to go for 2 is even more egregious because there was still 1:20 left, plenty of time for North Central (great school name by the way) to get to field goal range so you don't even have the upside of sealing a victory by converting--the upside is a one-point lead with 1:20 left and the other team has the ball, and the downside is needing to recover an onside kick to have any hope of winning. Whether they tied the score with an extra point or went up by one with a 2-point conversion, either way they would have to stop North Central from getting to field goal range, but missing the 2 just made it so North Central didn't even have to do that.