For those interested in historic sights. Went to a play last night at Ford’s Theater. Was seated close to the door where John Wilkes Booth entered Lincoln’s box. Fords Theater
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grant regretted later he wasn't there. He thought he might have been able to protect Lincoln.Grant was supposed to be there that night but he backed-out after Mrs Grant objected
She didn't like Mrs Lincoln
Amazingly enough, round-the-clock governmental protection for the President was not established until after President William McKinley was assassinated in 1901. Not even the assassination of President James Garfield in 1881 had been sufficient to bring this about. https://www.history.com/news/mckinley-assassination-created-the-secret-service (Moderators: sorry if this is too political).“Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?” An old joke. It’s amazing when you compare what today’s presidential security compared to then. When you factor in the country was in a Civil War, the lack of security is astonishing. If Lincoln had lived, the entire Reconstruction period would have been entirely different and the US would have been much further along regarding race relations.
What a different path that would have led to.If Lincoln had lived, the entire Reconstruction period would have been entirely different and the US would have been much further along regarding race relations.
Booth certainly said the former (which was the state motto of Virginia). ("Thus always to tyrants!") He may have said the latter.https://www.pbs.org/wnet/lookingforlincoln/lincoln-myths-and-misconceptions-quiz-answer-12/“Sic Semper Tyrannis” or “The South is Avenged”?
Hard to know what exactly the path would have been, but Lincoln had already shown himself to be excellent at sensing the public mood and at mediating between the conservative and radical branches of the Republican party. He knew when to adhere to his principles, and when he had to compromise. In other words, Lincoln was a master politician in the best sense.What a different path that would have led to.
“Sic Semper Tyrannis” or “The South is Avenged”?
Crazy Joe Davola said the same thing.Booth certainly said the former (which was the state motto of Virginia). ("Thus always to tyrants!") He may have said the latter.https://www.pbs.org/wnet/lookingforlincoln/lincoln-myths-and-misconceptions-quiz-answer-12/
It wasn't just losing Lincoln at that moment in time, but also gaining A. Johnson (probably the worst person for the challenge of reconstruction). Our history would have also been very different if the VP was a true Lincoln supporter with a similar POV.Hard to know what exactly the path would have been, but Lincoln had already shown himself to be excellent at sensing the public mood and at mediating between the conservative and radical branches of the Republican party. He knew when to adhere to his principles, and when he had to compromise. In other words, Lincoln was a master politician in the best sense.
Yes, Johnson was a disaster. He lacked LIncoln's political touch.It wasn't just losing Lincoln at that moment in time, but also gain A. Johnson (probably the worst person for the challenge of reconstruction). Our history would have also been very different if the VP was a true Lincoln supporter with a similar POV.
The Grants were on there way to see their children at there home........in Burlington.Grant was supposed to be there that night but he backed-out after Mrs Grant objected
She didn't like Mrs Lincoln
I actually meant that Lincoln was determined to help the South rejoin/recover and support freed slaves become full citizens. AJ wasn't really interested in these goals.Yes, Johnson was a disaster. He lacked LIncoln's political touch.
I'm not sure if there was such a thing as a true LIncoln supporter: Lincoln was one of a kind in his ability to discern the path that would work.
Lincoln had two goals for the post-war period that were going to come in conflict. On the one hand, unlike the radicals, he wanted to be generous to the rebelling states and to bring them back into the Union quickly. On the other hand, unlike the conservatives in his party, he wanted voting rights at least for the Black soldiers who had fought so courageously for the Union. (It was Lincoln's support for black voting rights that was the last straw for Booth.) Bringing about those two goals was going to be hard. We don't know if and how Lincoln could have done it, or what Lincoln would have done if he found these two goals irreconcilable. One thing is for sure: whatever he would have done, he would have been more successful than Johnson.
By the way, one of the best documents about the Confederacy is the diary kept by Mary Chesnut, wife of a very prominent Southern leader. She recounts how angry her friends were that Lincoln (whom they hated) had been assassinated because they knew it would make him a martyr who would be honored forever.
C. Vann Woodward edited an excellent edition of the diary. It is worth reading even for the gossipy parts about the young women that Mrs. Chesnut knew.I actually meant that Lincoln was determined to help the South rejoin/recover and support freed slaves become full citizens. AJ wasn't really interested in these goals.
I haven't read the diary by Mary Chesnut, but obviously it is used quite extensively in Ken Burns' Civil War doc. Perhaps I will check out the source material!
"Isn't it pretty to think so," to borrow a line from Hemingway. A masterful politician, Lincoln was not quite the champion of racial justice we might wish him to have been. And amidst the struggles of reconstruction and then with the rise of the Dixiecrats, the defeated South would have not have accommodated any Federal efforts to accelerate "improving" race relations. It just wasn't possible. Even if Lincoln were not assassinated, it'd likely still be a hundred years before any political inroads were made, ironically by another "Johnson," LBJ.“Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?” An old joke. It’s amazing when you compare what today’s presidential security compared to then. When you factor in the country was in a Civil War, the lack of security is astonishing. If Lincoln had lived, the entire Reconstruction period would have been entirely different and the US would have been much further along regarding race relations.
That was the excuse lolThe Grants were on there way to see their children at there home........in Burlington.
Outside of Abe I don't think anyone liked Mrs. LincolnThat was the excuse lol
"Just days after accepting Lee’s surrender, the Union general accepted Lincoln’s invitation to attend “Our American Cousin” at Ford’s Theatre on the evening of April 14, 1865. The general’s wife, however, had recently been the victim of Mary Todd Lincoln’s acid tongue and wanted no part of a night on the town with the first lady. Grant backed out, citing the couple’s desire to travel to New Jersey to see their children."
10 Things You May Not Know About the Lincoln Assassination
Explore 10 surprising facts about one of the most infamous moments in American history.www.history.com
I don't even like Mrs Lincoln lolOutsid eof Abe I don't think anyone liked Mrs. Lincoln
Garfield also had no protective detail when he was shot. Went to railroad station with his two sons and Secretary of State.Amazingly enough, round-the-clock governmental protection for the President was not established until after President William McKinley was assassinated in 1901. Not even the assassination of President James Garfield in 1881 had been sufficient to bring this about. https://www.history.com/news/mckinley-assassination-created-the-secret-service (Moderators: sorry if this is too political).
I don’t think Lincoln would have agreed to let the former states in rebellion against the US, to have authority in administering and determining how the former slaves would be integrated into society. He was firmly on the side of using Federal power to achieve the desired outcome. I don’t think the barriers erected and violence that was used to subjugate the former slaves after war would have been tolerated. He had the will, leadership and intelligence to effect the transformation unlike the weak and feeble Johnson."Isn't it pretty to think so," to borrow a line from Hemingway. A masterful politician, Lincoln was not quite the champion of racial justice we might wish him to have been. And amidst the struggles of reconstruction and then with the rise of the Dixiecrats, the defeated South would have not have accommodated any Federal efforts to accelerate "improving" race relations. It just wasn't possible. Even if Lincoln were not assassinated, it'd likely still be a hundred years before any political inroads were made, ironically by another "Johnson," LBJ.
We just don't know. As I said above, Lincoln was trying to pursue conflicting objectives because he wanted to restore the Union as soon as possible. He would certainly have done better than Andrew Johnson. (Johnson's problem wasn't so much that he was weak but that he couldn't get along with anybody, and was racist to boot.) I think I agree that Lincoln would not have countenanced the Black Codes that the former slave states created to hold the newly-emancipated Blacks in near-slavery. I agree he would have done more to incorporate the former slaves into free society. It's clear he would have allowed the vote for at least some Blacks. It's hard to tell beyond that.I don’t think Lincoln would have agreed to let the former states in rebellion against the US, to have authority in administering and determining how the former slaves would be integrated into society. He was firmly on the side of using Federal power to achieve the desired outcome. I don’t think the barriers erected and violence that was used to subjugate the former slaves after war would have been tolerated. He had the will, leadership and intelligence to effect the transformation unlike the weak and feeble Johnson.
I don’t think Lincoln would have agreed to let the former states in rebellion against the US, to have authority in administering and determining how the former slaves would be integrated into society. He was firmly on the side of using Federal power to achieve the desired outcome. I don’t think the barriers erected and violence that was used to subjugate the former slaves after war would have been tolerated. He had the will, leadership and intelligence to effect the transformation unlike the weak and feeble Johnson.
The History Underground is one of my favorite YouTube channels.Solid video on Ford's Theater and the assassination:
Overall, this is a very good YT channel for history buffs.
No. "Thus ever to Tyrants"“Sic Semper Tyrannis” or “The South is Avenged”?
He may have said both, as I describe above.No. "Thus ever to Tyrants"
The flag that was used as a pillow for his head is in the history/art museum in tiny Milford, PA. Blood stained. It is incredibly moving to be standing there looking at it.The chair Lincoln was sitting in (blood stained and all) and the dress worn by the lead actress of My American Cousin (who cradled Lincoln’s head) are among other artifacts of that event that are displayed in the Henry Ford Museum in Deerborn Michigan.
that Museum is huge and well worth the trip.
The original Fords theater was destroyed and later rebuiltFor those interested in historic sights. Went to a play last night at Ford’s Theater. Was seated close to the door where John Wilkes Booth entered Lincoln’s box. Fords Theater
I am not entirely sure this is the case... that if Lincoln lived reconstruction and race.What a different path that would have led to.
Lincoln spent more time listening, less time talking. The opposite of all politicians and most people today.Hard to know what exactly the path would have been, but Lincoln had already shown himself to be excellent at sensing the public mood and at mediating between the conservative and radical branches of the Republican party. He knew when to adhere to his principles, and when he had to compromise. In other words, Lincoln was a master politician in the best sense.
Grant was long thought to have been a terrible President, and indeed his cronies were corrupt. But the biographies of him by Jean Edward Smith and Ron Chernow (whose biography of Hamilton inspired the musical) have done much to rehabilitate his reputation.U.S. Grant was a big Lincoln supporter and when he was President he tried to protect Black rights in the South the way he thought that Lincoln might have.