Hey, come to think of it - our coach's situation that led to his suspension could be known as Floodgate.(controversy)gate
Hey, come to think of it - our coach's situation that led to his suspension could be known as Floodgate.(controversy)gate
Agreed. "That [pick your food] was amazing". I have yet to eat anything that was 'amazing' and I've consumed my share of good food.
You hit the nail right on the head. We went to Old Bay in New Brunswick not long ago and the waitress used the phrase "no problem" every time we said thank you... It was driving us nuts.
I understand the need-to-get-a-job aspect of proper english usage, but the point of the thread didn't seem to be language as an employment tool as much as words and expressions that grate on your nerves simply because they are personally annoying in any context. There is a creative aspect to each generation's linguistic adaptations and alterations that are fun to behold. The difference between the OED (more prescriptivist) and AED (more descriptivist) reflects one culture's ready acceptance of such changes and another's determination to remain the same. Depending on context I embrace arguments for inclusion or exclusion from a dictionary (see: googled), but by and large the creative element puts a smile on my face simply because it shows how the next generation is marking its territory.RaRa: I use many of these phrases all the time. But when I get to work, go to church, or am around my toddler, I can filter them out and replace them with more appropriate words for those settings. For some folks, there is no filter and that's all they know. Like it or not, they will be disadvantaged when competing for jobs with others who are more refined.
"No Problem".
I say to a waiter/waitress 'Thank You' for something and they reply 'No Problem'.
I sure hope doing your job is 'No Problem', but I may have a problem giving you a good tip.
The reply to a 'Thank You' should be 'You're Welcome'.
Bro- can not stand when a stranger calls me bro
True dat.rara: agree with much of your last post.
I think my own personal issues with today's colloquialisms tainted my original response to yours.
How about from mouth to toilet bowl?Agreed. Where else are you going to throw up?
This always annoys me too. What is it that they were afraid of?Okay, I'll give one that is an abomination: "coward," when used in reference to the 9/11 hijackers and other psychos. I get the sentiment about wanting to demean such people and their actions, but we really should use more appropriate descriptions than those that are manifestly false. Someone who believes in a cause to the extent that he gives his own life for it is not a coward, whether we like it or not--we wouldn't use the word "brave," either, since that carries a sense of nobility, so we are best staying away from either appellation. The Kamikaze pilots in WW2 weren't cowards, either. Just because we end up on the tragic side of others' actions doesn't automatically place them in the category of Coward, especially since so many more appropriate categories are available.
versing
As in: Who is Rutgers versing this weekend? Rutgers is versing Indiana.
Holy Shite, thought it was just my daughter. Been trying to break her of this habit all season long. Where the hell did this start?I just had a stroke reading this.
I hate all words, I wish we would all go back to grunting.