Gateway Pundit? I thought they went bankrupt after all the made up news was exposed and the resulting lawsuits.
Gateway Pundit? I thought they went bankrupt after all the made up news was exposed and the resulting lawsuits.
Why was the Military giving training to a person on her second day of a new position behind the wheel?Over emotional NTSB team leader.
Jet was on normal, perfect glide path final approach before it was slammed by wayward copter.
It’s either pilot error or ATC error…or both combined.
Why was the Military giving training to a person on her second day of a new position behind the wheel?
How can this be done at a very busy time at very busy place.
Delete as much as you want to stay private
Deleting entire accounts from existence just causes people to dig even deeper and to create wild theories
Grief can do strange things. 🤷♂️It’s normal for someone’s entire family to wipe out all online info ??
The 2 other pilots didn’t have that done while their names were released 2 days earlier ???
Why do you think the 2 other pilots didn’t need to do it?It’s normal for someone’s entire family to wipe out all online info ??
The 2 other pilots didn’t have that done while their names were released 2 days earlier ???
Thank you for taking the time to explain this is a clear way. Your expertise is appreciated.At some point it's going to be the 2nd day.
Look, this is important. There's no "soft peddling" flight training. There's no "let's not do this because there's risk". It's immersion training and hard core, at that.
FAA training requirements mandate that no student pilot may operate an aircraft solo before 10 hours of instruction. I did it at exactly 10, the average is probably around 12. That's not a lot of instruction. But you're either going to "get it" or you're not. It's serious business and the training process is very much designed to identify and weed out those who can't be easily trained.
First solo is an interesting ritual. Audiences are encouraged. When you land the mob cuts whatever shirt you're wearing from your body and it gets hung up on a wall. Because when you land, you've done something. Something that the overwhelming majority of people will never do and that most could never really conceive of.
I remember mine. I did a few touch & go approaches with my instructor, then landed and parked. He got out of the plane and walked away, I powered it up and taxied back to the runway and took off.
Taking off, by the way, is pretty easy. It's so easy that, on your very first introductory flight most instructors will let you do it by yourself, without their hands guiding the yoke or hovering over the throttle.
Landing is very much a different thing. Landing is hard. All. The. Time. And I vividly remember, as I turned onto a short final approach alone for the very first time, thinking to myself, "well, you have to do this or you'll die." Most people will never encounter that situation, a circumstance where, if you f*ck up just a little, you wind up actually dead.
The immersion, the baptism by fire, continue all the way through your training. Your first instrument landing. First night flight, and night landing. Your first engine-out takeoff. The first time you manage an approach in a large, fast aircraft (mine was a King Air 250, the biggest plane I've ever flown) where the approach speed is nearly 200 mph and you have to kiss the runway at a buck forty.
Right or wrong, the particular Army unit was accustomed to training in the DCA area. They did it on the daily. They did it playing chicken with commercial jets full of people who fully expected to be getting on with their lives once the plane landed. Again, you can question the sanity of it, overall - and I certainly do - but that's what they did.
So it was always, at some point, going to be the second day.
By the way, for those who aren't aware... If there are two people in the cockpit then the person not at the controls has the primary responsibility for handing the radios, engaging with non-flight controls (gear, flaps, throttles, etc.) and watching for traffic. So, for those who are really invested in the distinction, if a girl was flying the helicopter than a guy was responsible for the other stuff.
It is the same site that had her name when no other outlet had it. Discredit the site if you want, but all I said was it seemed odd and it lends itself to scrutiny. Rest assured, the sweeping stuff under the rug is a thing of the past for the next 4 years. Well, let me correct myself, if indeed Trump orders stuff hidden, he'll have to break some land speed records to catch up to the Obama/Pelosi/Schiff/Schumer Regime. Ask Jill, I think she's about ready to pop a cork on the whole $hitshow. 😁Gateway Pundit? I thought they went bankrupt after all the made up news was exposed and the resulting lawsuits.
that would be cbs and abcGateway Pundit? I thought they went bankrupt after all the made up news was exposed and the resulting lawsuits.
It’s normal for someone’s entire family to wipe out all online info ??
The 2 other pilots didn’t have that done while their names were released 2 days earlier ???
Unless the family scrubbed the backup tapes in the data center, they didn't scrub shit. Hopefully they didn't screw up any investigations with that little stunt. Because while the pilot's family wanted to "protect it's privacy", the other 66 families want the unvarnished truth on wtf happened.
There should be no stones left unturned.And you think that unvarnished truth is gonna come from the pilot’s Facebook page?
How silly are you people?
There should be no stones left unturned.
This is a gross negligence from either ATC or the pilot resulting in catastrophic loss of life…Every source of information is on the table
Do you believe this crash was a DEI issue?At some point it's going to be the 2nd day.
Look, this is important. There's no "soft peddling" flight training. There's no "let's not do this because there's risk". It's immersion training and hard core, at that.
FAA training requirements mandate that no student pilot may operate an aircraft solo before 10 hours of instruction. I did it at exactly 10, the average is probably around 12. That's not a lot of instruction. But you're either going to "get it" or you're not. It's serious business and the training process is very much designed to identify and weed out those who can't be easily trained.
First solo is an interesting ritual. Audiences are encouraged. When you land the mob cuts whatever shirt you're wearing from your body and it gets hung up on a wall. Because when you land, you've done something. Something that the overwhelming majority of people will never do and that most could never really conceive of.
I remember mine. I did a few touch & go approaches with my instructor, then landed and parked. He got out of the plane and walked away, I powered it up and taxied back to the runway and took off.
Taking off, by the way, is pretty easy. It's so easy that, on your very first introductory flight most instructors will let you do it by yourself, without their hands guiding the yoke or hovering over the throttle.
Landing is very much a different thing. Landing is hard. All. The. Time. And I vividly remember, as I turned onto a short final approach alone for the very first time, thinking to myself, "well, you have to do this or you'll die." Most people will never encounter that situation, a circumstance where, if you f*ck up just a little, you wind up actually dead.
The immersion, the baptism by fire, continue all the way through your training. Your first instrument landing. First night flight, and night landing. Your first engine-out takeoff. The first time you manage an approach in a large, fast aircraft (mine was a King Air 250, the biggest plane I've ever flown) where the approach speed is nearly 200 mph and you have to kiss the runway at a buck forty.
Right or wrong, the particular Army unit was accustomed to training in the DCA area. They did it on the daily. They did it playing chicken with commercial jets full of people who fully expected to be getting on with their lives once the plane landed. Again, you can question the sanity of it, overall - and I certainly do - but that's what they did.
So it was always, at some point, going to be the second day.
By the way, for those who aren't aware... If there are two people in the cockpit then the person not at the controls has the primary responsibility for handing the radios, engaging with non-flight controls (gear, flaps, throttles, etc.) and watching for traffic. So, for those who are really invested in the distinction, if a girl was flying the helicopter than a guy was responsible for the other stuff.
Interesting, so what has the actual investigation revealed? Anyone have any details on that? I knew the pilot was a woman or a black person or a Mexican or something as soon as the company line was to blame dei. And it was said that you have to be a genius and highly intellectual etc to fly. Has to speak to his political base, perception of First 100 days in office are what's important here. I don't like these emotional responses because you never end up actually solving the problem. I remember Notre Dame lost to Northern Illinois you posted about dei. And how freeman the dei hire lost to a 1aa team, let's try not to allow preconceived notions to guide us. Dei, dei, dei it's become like AI in business...just add AI to the end of anything you want sell and people buy or invest in it lol...buzzword don't mean to laugh at the situation but the way people are behaving these days is comical to me .I did an image search days ago after name came out.
I can see why they might have wanted to delete some things in current situation
At USMA they would say she's part of "the family."
Now that wouldn't mean she was not talented for flying.
But she might have been getting rushed - the goal is to takeover command and people are kicked up the ladder.
DEI is intended to surpass AA and hijack Civil Rights movement with great emphasis on a certain other groups.
If you watched LA fire officials you could see what was going on.
![]()
Kind of like how the catch phrase he's Hitler and we must save Democracy has been tossed around no matter what the topic I guess. Either way you look at it, we all fly and we need to hear went wrong to correct it, no matter what it turns out to be. That's a fair request, no?Interesting, so what has the actual investigation revealed? Anyone have any details on that? I knew the pilot was a woman or a black person or a Mexican or something as soon as the company line was to blame dei. And it was said that you have to be a genius and highly intellectual etc to fly. Has to speak to his political base, perception of First 100 days in office are what's important here. I don't like these emotional responses because you never end up actually solving the problem. I remember Notre Dame lost to Northern Illinois you posted about dei. And how freeman the dei hire lost to a 1aa team, let's try not to allow preconceived notions to guide us. Dei, dei, dei it's become like AI in business...just add AI to the end of anything you want sell and people buy or invest in it lol...buzzword don't mean to laugh at the situation but the way people are behaving these days is comical to me .
Originally they thought it was a Trans pilot, Jo Ellis, but they found out she was still alive after they contacted her. That’s why they thought it was DEI. He probably saw it on social media. People are believing everything they read on social media.Interesting, so what has the actual investigation revealed? Anyone have any details on that? I knew the pilot was a woman or a black person or a Mexican or something as soon as the company line was to blame dei. And it was said that you have to be a genius and highly intellectual etc to fly. Has to speak to his political base, perception of First 100 days in office are what's important here. I don't like these emotional responses because you never end up actually solving the problem. I remember Notre Dame lost to Northern Illinois you posted about dei. And how freeman the dei hire lost to a 1aa team, let's try not to allow preconceived notions to guide us. Dei, dei, dei it's become like AI in business...just add AI to the end of anything you want sell and people buy or invest in it lol...buzzword don't mean to laugh at the situation but the way people are behaving these days is comical to me .
Because the commercial aircraft pilot had a Hispanic surname and the co-pilot was a woman.Originally they thought it was a Trans pilot but they found out she was still alive after they contacted her. That’s why they thought it was DEI. He probably saw it on social media
![]()
Who is Jo Ellis? Trans Black Hawk pilot wrongly named in DC crash
Jo Ellis said it is "insulting to the victims and families" to have been incorrectly named as one of the pilots involved in the crash on Wednesday.www.newsweek.com
That’s like when the Silicon Valley Bank failed in 2023, many on this board blamed DEI policies hiring females and minorities. So anytime anything bad happens blame females and minority, interesting.Because the commercial aircraft pilot had a Hispanic surname and the co-pilot was a woman.
Kind of like how the catch phrase he's Hitler and we must save Democracy has been tossed around no matter what the topic I guess. Either way you look at it, we all fly and we need to hear went wrong to correct it, no matter what it turns out to be. That's a fair request, no?
If it was just her social media pages that would seem normal. Why were both sisters and parents online footprints completely erased ???
No idea what it means and if it means anything at all but it has caused plenty of people to try and dig up anything to make a name for themselves.
Hope you don’t mind, but I added to your description of social media.Because they too would likely get inundated with the crack pots DMing them, etc.
It's surprising that people here are struggling with this. Social media has become a hell hole. It's filled with angry, mean, vindictive, ignorant people, as well as bots created by hostile foreign nations. The family probably realized, and probably rightfully, that in this current climate, once it came out one of the pilot's was a woman, that the anti-DEI crowd would be out in full force. We've seen people's lives upended because social media "sleuths" have claimed something and then harassed people only to find out, whoops, our bad.
I don't blame the family at all for taking themselves out of what is such a toxic cauldron of stupidity at times.
Do you believe this crash was a DEI issue?
That’s like when the Silicon Valley Bank failed in 2023, many on this board blamed DEI policies hiring females and minorities. So anytime anything bad happens blame females and minority, interesting.
I wonder if their spouse is working and someone blame the mistake on her since she’s DEI whether they agree with her or silently agree that it’s her fault. It’s amusing.
I always wonder what the "its DEI crowd" think when a white male screws up.
I think gross negligence by anyone is reprehensible.I always wonder what the "its DEI crowd" think when a white male screws up.
I used to say when you need to hear the level headed post in a thread, see what @Upstream said.I think gross negligence by anyone is reprehensible.
This DC accident is gross negligence by someone
I agree but why immediately claim it is DEI when they never say something is WP? How about there are times even qualified people make errors.I think gross negligence by anyone is reprehensible.
This DC accident is gross negligence by someone
"think" should be replaced in your comment with "imagine", or "make up", or 'fantasize" or "dream up" or "presume" or, well, I think you get the point.I always wonder what the "its DEI crowd" think when a white male screws up.
Did he do that?I agree but why immediately claim it is DEI when they never say something is WP? How about there are times even qualified people make errors.
Who's "he"?Did he do that?
No. But several others on this thread did. My original post never implied I was referring to him.Did he do that?
I know.No.
The question itself is absurd.
When you quote someone it looks that way.No. But several others on this thread did. My original post never implied I was referring to him.