1) Maybe you don't know much about Ray, but that is how he speaks. From the hip and extremely honest. He is a bit rough around the edges, but that's why we love him. It had nothing to do with an agenda. If he has an opinion, he will give it to you straight.Huh? I admittedly didn't hear the radio show, but OP said Ray was asked if Franklin "was bad for Hackenberg." He could have answered that question in any number of ways: bad fit for the system, ruined his mechanics, etc. Instead he chose to say Franklin was bad for Penn State. If you think that's "answering the question," we'll just disagree. To me it looks like Ray, an RU alum and broadcaster who clearly has no love lost for PSU, took the question as an opportunity to take a shot at Franklin's overall ability as a head coach. And again, he's entitled to believe Franklin's "bad for Penn State," just like I'm entitled to believe comments like that make Ray look like a small-time guy pushing an agenda for a struggling program that has now lost twice - once embarrassingly - to said bad coach.
2) That lost last year was hardly embarrassing. Look at the drubbings we got from the top teams in the conference.
Remember we are still Rutgers, we have taken many beatings...just working to change that now.