Yes, as unflattering data kept emerging, the actual virus plus "exercise" and "poor lifestyles" became the excuse to put a fig leaf on "excess death" and illness" data - just mudding the puddles
Lancet (had to retract a fraudulent HCQ study) did just that
"Many countries, including the UK, have continued to experience an apparent excess of deaths long after the peaks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021.1,2 Numbers of excess deaths estimated in this period are considerable. The UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) has calculated that there were 7.2% or 44,255 more deaths registered in the UK in 2022 based on comparison with the five-year average (excluding 2020).1 This persisted into 2023 with 8.6% or 28,024 more deaths registered in the first six months of the year than expected.
1 The Continuous Mortality Investigation (CMI) found a similar excess (28,500 deaths) for the same period using different methods.3 Several methods can be used to estimate excess deaths, each with limitations which should be considered in interpretation, however the overall trends tend to be consistent across the various methods. The causes of these excess deaths are likely to be multiple and could include the direct effects of Covid-19 infection,1 acute pressures on NHS acute services resulting in poorer outcomes from episodes of acute illness,4 and disruption to chronic disease detection and management.5 Further analysis by cause and by age- and sex-group may help quantify the relative contributions of these causes.
Over and over one reads of hellacious stats about burgeoning, global, death and illness events which get blamed everything but the experimental, synthetic gene junk they were often forced to take.
Recently the FDA lost in court because it had no business telling people Ivermectin didn't work because it was "horse medicine." It was human medicine of long use that could also be used on animals (like amoxicillin for fisg at pet shops)
Operation "War Speed" had original protocols that advised "vaccine" ( definition had to be redefined on the fly) for elderly and infirm. Everyone else was supposed to get therapeutics. But those were denied to people in a very dastardly manner. HCQ was declared safe by CDC for decades but suddenly became the devils brew. Apparently the mandates were only legally possible if no therapeutics were available. So the T'peutics got slandered and people died after being denied. All over the world those drugs were working. There are lawsuits working their way through courts in Texas and other places
Ivermectin and Statistical Significance
Fifth Circuit sides with ivermectin-prescribing doctors in their quarrel with the FDA
The Food and Drug Administration is not a physician, so it had no business cautioning people not to take ivermectin to ward off Covid-19 infections with social media posts stating, “You are not a horse,” the Fifth Circuit said.
Three doctors who prescribed ivermectin for Covid-19 patients have valid claims that the Food and Drug Administration overstepped its authority with a campaign warning people not to take the drug, a Fifth Circuit panel ruled Friday, reinstating the trio’s lawsuit against the agency.
Drs. Robert Apter and Mary Talley Bowden say between them they have treated or consulted more than 9,000 Covid patients and they each have a patient survival rate of more than 99%, despite regularly prescribing them ivermectin off-label to treat the respiratory illness."
The people running agencies straight-up killed people by denying them proven, standard, and cheap medicines
www.nbcnews.com
