Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many other officials or Supreme Court Justices have street cred names.Oh my.
Rest in peace.
and if the following happens expect to see thisMcConnell just put out a statement, there will be a vote on the next nominee
Seems a bit excessive for a message board but that’s just me. You be youIf I ever cross paths with you, I’m sticking my fist in your pathetic face. F*ck you.
let me say the empathy you are showing is very disturbing.NPR already quoting her granddaughter claiming her dying words were don’t let her replacement come from this President. Sounds like a made up TDS story.
How many other officials or Supreme Court Justices have street cred names.
long live RBG ...
Mo
That's gonna be a tough vote for the likes of Collins, Gardner, and McSally.McConnell just put out a statement, there will be a vote on the next nominee
Why so you can have time to make up fake rape stories about the next SCJ nomination? Maybe use their high school year book as the best evidence?please show respect.
Let us be allowed a little time to morn Justice Ginsburg's death before posting our favorite replacements..
.
you are right - and you should fear that - it would officially become a one party system nationwide.and if the following happens expect to see this
Scenarios.... If McConnell and Twitler ram through a new nominee
with Biden winning Presidency and Dems win Senate then the SCOTUS going to 11-15 justices.
Mark it down
Graham did in 2018, said after the primaries start its too late. I don't trust any of them as far as I can throw them.That's gonna be a tough vote for the likes of Collins, Gardner, and McSally.
Murkowski has just gone on record opposing the vote. Grassley had done so some time ago, but then it was a hypothetical. Now it's real. So we'll see.
LolShe was a judicial giant, accomplishing so much during her lifetime, as a student, a wife, a professor, a mother, and of course as a Supreme Court Justice. Also, loved the clips and stories of her great friendship with Justice Scalia, her polar opposite on the bench. Shows how possible it is for people with different viewpoints to still get along. RIP Notorious RBG (she loved that nickname).
That's gonna be a tough vote for the likes of Collins, Gardner, and McSally.
Murkowski has just gone on record opposing the vote. Grassley had done so some time ago, but then it was a hypothetical. Now it's real. So we'll see.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg had a long , great career . The over the top reaction though by some is very melodramatic at best. Making Ruth Bader out to be more is taking away from her legacy. If it wasn’t an election year one wonders if the drama would be so pronounced on this board?If I ever cross paths with you, I’m sticking my fist in your pathetic face. F*ck you.
We don't appoint Supreme Court Justices in election years now so there won't be a vote, right? I'm sure the Republicans on the board will line up to agree with this. It was their party that came up with this rule after all.
He was quite Presidential as he genuinely showed his respect for Justice Ginsburg.Have no fear though I’m positive someone will claim he denigrated the memory tomorrow on several of the news channels.Wow! Trump properly respectful and circumspect. Now if he'll just stay off Twitter in the morning.
And then the Rs go to 15-19 justices the first time they get the chance. Where does it end? They are 4-5 Senate Dems already on the record that they will not increased the # of seats. This is a pipe dream.and if the following happens expect to see this
Scenarios.... If McConnell and Twitler ram through a new nominee
with Biden winning Presidency and Dems win Senate then the SCOTUS going to 11-15 justices.
Mark it down
It is the same, but if repugs dare go through with this, dems will pack the court.you are having a hard time with this, its not the same but keep parroting the talking points
It doesn't but if one side will play with fire the other will have to also.And then the Rs go to 15-19 justices the first time they get the chance. Where does it end? They are 4-5 Senate Dems already on the record that they will not increased the # of seats. This is a pipe dream.
+1It doesn't but if one side will play with fire the other will have to also.
Won't have the votes 2021 no matter what. Too many Dems won't destroy SCOTUS for partisan reasons.It is the same, but if repugs dare go through with this, dems will pack the court.
Won't be destroyed. Will be enhanced.Won't have the votes 2021 no matter what. Too many Dems won't destroy SCOTUS for partisan reasons.
How is it not the same?you are having a hard time with this, its not the same but keep parroting the talking points
Well, you can blame McConnell for that. For reasons unclear, he felt compelled to announce tonight that he was bringing this to a vote.its terrible that even the death of someone makes the lousy, sour, pathetic politic creep in on every little thing. Not for 1 day could it just be put away for peace and reflection.
How is it not the same?
Well, you can blame McConnell for that. For reasons unclear, he felt compelled to announce tonight that he was bringing this to a vote.
no violence, we will just pack the courts. Elections have consequencesI also find it more offensive that blue check Dems on twitter are threatening violence and riots if another justice is voted on