ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Stock and Investment Talk

Another garbage earnings in my portfolio. Also in the EV space.

INDI.


Reports Q4 (Dec) loss of $0.01 per share, in-line with the FactSet Consensus of ($0.01); revenues rose 112.4% year/year to $70.1 mln vs the $72.62 mln FactSet Consensus. Co issues downside guidance for Q1, sees Q1 revs down by 20% sequentially, equating to revenue of approximately $56.0 mln vs. $76.16 mln FactSet Consensus."Looking forward, based on our new product pipeline, we anticipate Q1 to be a trough quarter with top line recovery in Q2 and a resumption of outsized sequential growth in Q3 and Q4, yielding a profitability baseline in the second half of this year, ahead of our significant Radar and Vision ramps in 2025."

I'm hanging in.
Bear Therapy Session. Mike Wilson's first appearance since getting demoted at Morgan Stanley:

 
Rivian is soooo tempting at these levels…but the downgrades keep coming and I’m starting to wonder if they can survive a long EV winter. I’d say there is chance in 2 years Rivian’s stock will have tripled …or it files for bankruptcy and/or is acquired at a fire-sale price.
Id wait(though i do own some now) for it to get out of its downtrend. You’ll probably miss 30% or more but if it sticks the stock is a long term double-triple or more.
 
Last edited:
By the way, what happened to GE in 2017/2018 when it last dumped?
I gave you a very high level response when you asked this. This article popped in my feed and is a good one with a little more detail of all the issues.

Also iirc that Alstom deal was completely written down. Immelt bought a business that was declining on top of which they had to bend over backwards to the French gov’t in a labor friendly environment….ill-timed misguided decisions.

LTC was also an issue that should have been dealt with but instead reared its ugly head after decade or more.

All these issues and then the pandemic cratering travel is as bad a situation you could find and Culp turned the lump of coal into a diamond.

A highlight from the article. 😉

For 2023, GE posted the largest share appreciation of any U.S. industrial, clocking a gain of 95.8%, including value of the GE HealthCare stock investors received at the spinoff. Shareholders who kept their GE HealthCare stock did even better: Its shares jumped 33% last year. It speaks to Wall Street’s esteem for the future of GE’s remaining businesses that its current market cap of $144 billion is half again higher than its valuation when it owned GE HealthCare. Oh, and GE stock handily outperformed Apple, Google, and Microsoft in 2023.


 
Any thoughts on PLTR?
22x rev's, with 30% rev growth sounds very pricey to me.

People call out SMCI for being an AI hype poster child, but SMCI is significantly cheaper with significantly better growth. I feel companies like PLTR are more indicative of hype pushing a stock.

Granted different industries, so different multiples, and maybe PTLR's growth is more sustainable long term, but I don't know, that price to revs relative to growth sounds rich.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain Hogleg
Any thoughts on PLTR?

22x rev's, with 30% rev growth sounds very pricey to me.

People call out SMCI for being an AI hype poster child, but SMCI is significantly cheaper with significantly better growth. I feel companies like PLTR are more indicative of hype pushing a stock.

Granted different industries, so different multiples, and maybe PTLR's growth is more sustainable long term, but I don't know, that price to revs relative to growth sounds rich.
PLTR is a long term buy with a good chance to go into the S&P 500 at some point in the next 12 months. It will continue to grow exponentially. I really like the price action in the stock from $7 to $25. The gaps have been sustained for the most part and orderly. Unfair to compare to SMCI. SMCI is a cyclical stock and will therefore have a lower PE. Competition is more likely to affect SMCI vs a PLTR. having said that SMCI is certainly having a moment and could continue to run higher now that it has gone through a 30+% correction.
 
Fun day with the markets. Thank you NVDA and Mr. Huang.

@RU-05 : Didn't pick up any RIVN calls yet. Need to do some research tonight. They are unveiling their R2 platform in a few weeks, which may be a positive catalyst if well received.
RIVN is a no go at this point. I might play for the short term bounce using options, but not going to deploy real capital at this juncture.
Rivian is soooo tempting at these levels…but the downgrades keep coming and I’m starting to wonder if they can survive a long EV winter. I’d say there is chance in 2 years Rivian’s stock will have tripled …or it files for bankruptcy and/or is acquired at a fire-sale price.
RIVN will struggle this year and maybe next. I need to see how they manage their cash in the upcoming quarters before purchasing more stock.

RJ Scaringe needs some CEO interviewing sessions. The CNBC interview from a few days ago was a disaster. it looked like he was going to cry. He had very poor body language and even gulped when asked about reaching profitability in Q4 of 2023. He needs to use the CEO coach that Mark Zuckerberg used in the early days of Facebook. It is clear he is nervous about the future of his company. I am glad I trimmed 50% when they announced last month that they hit their goal of car production but missed delivery targets.
 
PLTR is a long term buy with a good chance to go into the S&P 500 at some point in the next 12 months. It will continue to grow exponentially. I really like the price action in the stock from $7 to $25. The gaps have been sustained for the most part and orderly. Unfair to compare to SMCI. SMCI is a cyclical stock and will therefore have a lower PE. Competition is more likely to affect SMCI vs a PLTR. having said that SMCI is certainly having a moment and could continue to run higher now that it has gone through a 30+% correction.
From MS.

"Similarly, looking forward into FY24, the company guided to revenue growth accelerating to 19.5% YoY (from 16.7% in FY23) and topped consensus expectations by ~50 bps at the mid-point, but the Q1 guide looks for revenue growth to slow sequentially to 17.0% YoY and came in slightly below consensus."

Not seeing exponential growth.

But the stock has traded well over the past 12 months.
 
PLTR is a long term buy with a good chance to go into the S&P 500 at some point in the next 12 months. It will continue to grow exponentially. I really like the price action in the stock from $7 to $25. The gaps have been sustained for the most part and orderly. Unfair to compare to SMCI. SMCI is a cyclical stock and will therefore have a lower PE. Competition is more likely to affect SMCI vs a PLTR. having said that SMCI is certainly having a moment and could continue to run higher now that it has gone through a 30+% correction.
Got some PLTR at $18, but it hasn't given back much since the earnings rally. Would like to double my position, perhaps at $20'ish if it drifts lower?
 
RIVN is a no go at this point. I might play for the short term bounce using options, but not going to deploy real capital at this juncture.

RIVN will struggle this year and maybe next. I need to see how they manage their cash in the upcoming quarters before purchasing more stock.

RJ Scaringe needs some CEO interviewing sessions. The CNBC interview from a few days ago was a disaster. it looked like he was going to cry. He had very poor body language and even gulped when asked about reaching profitability in Q4 of 2023. He needs to use the CEO coach that Mark Zuckerberg used in the early days of Facebook. It is clear he is nervous about the future of his company. I am glad I trimmed 50% when they announced last month that they hit their goal of car production but missed delivery targets.
Completely agree. I posted the CNBC video yesterday and he was visible depressed. I've had my hand slapped a few times with RIVN. Just this week, I bought around $15.5 and dumped after the earnings report in extended at $13.5.....which turned out to be a good idea.

Maybe a temporary bounce around their R2 event on March 7th? That could be a quick option play.
 
From MS.

"Similarly, looking forward into FY24, the company guided to revenue growth accelerating to 19.5% YoY (from 16.7% in FY23) and topped consensus expectations by ~50 bps at the mid-point, but the Q1 guide looks for revenue growth to slow sequentially to 17.0% YoY and came in slightly below consensus."

Not seeing exponential growth.

But the stock has traded well over the past 12 months.
PLTR is one of Dan Ives' five double table-pounder stocks! I agree with RURAH that it will get into the S&P 500 soon which will be a huge catalyst. It's expensive, but their AI analytics work is heating up.
 
From MS.

"Similarly, looking forward into FY24, the company guided to revenue growth accelerating to 19.5% YoY (from 16.7% in FY23) and topped consensus expectations by ~50 bps at the mid-point, but the Q1 guide looks for revenue growth to slow sequentially to 17.0% YoY and came in slightly below consensus."

Not seeing exponential growth.

But the stock has traded well over the past 12 months.
Their projected revenue for the next quarter is lower because they will be ramping up their infrastructure to accommodate the huge uptick in the demand in their software. Once that is completed, you should see significant uptick in revenue. I don't know who MS is, but they didn't do their homework. The demand for their software is through the roof. My guess (only my guess) is that some point we will start to see NVDA type of quarterly reports. Remember... when it comes to AI, the hardware comes first and then eventually the software catches on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-05
Remember... when it comes to AI, the hardware comes first and then eventually the software catches on.
Great point! The infrastructure is built first (NVDA) and then the companies that use/apply AI become the next round of massive winners. As investors, we need to figure out where the hockey puck is going next.
 
Their projected revenue for the next quarter is lower because they will be ramping up their infrastructure to accommodate the huge uptick in the demand in their software. Once that is completed, you should see significant uptick in revenue. I don't know who MS is, but they didn't do their homework. The demand for their software is through the roof. My guess (only my guess) is that some point we will start to see NVDA type of quarterly reports. Remember... when it comes to AI, the hardware comes first and then eventually the software catches on.

Even in things like apps and gaming the software has been lagging for awhile.
Windows is spaghetti code and AMD is working on new open source OS.
Enterprise hardware acquisition favors AMD - when they also get the open source tailored AMD will cook.
Of course quantum AI (the "real" AI) will be something different



 
Great point! The infrastructure is built first (NVDA) and then the companies that use/apply AI become the next round of massive winners. As investors, we need to figure out where the hockey puck is going next.
For the layperson like myself, stick with big tech imo especially a MSFT. AMD as well if companies want to diversify from just one supplier. Broadcom maybe.

It’s not much different than biotech imo. If you’re not in the know it’s hard to know which smaller player will come up with the next big thing. If they do, the big guys will come around and buy them out to eliminate the competition or use their tech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-05
Nice tribute to Munger:

 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1
For the layperson like myself, stick with big tech imo especially a MSFT. AMD as well if companies want to diversify from just one supplier. Broadcom maybe.

It’s not much different than biotech imo. If you’re not in the know it’s hard to know which smaller player will come up with the next big thing. If they do, the big guys will come around and buy them out to eliminate the competition or use their tech.
Luckily for laypeople, MSFT is absolutely on the list of companies that will use/apply AI to benefit customers and shareholders. META likely is as well. I believe PLTR, SNOW, and many of the cybersecurity companies. So plenty of well-known names to choose from.

And yes, there will be plenty of new/small companies that will become HUGE due to AI. These are like the "clinical stage biotechs" that are fun to look for, but very difficult to find.
 
Well if you hold that cash in short term treasuries making 5.2% as opposed to probably 1.2% from 2009-2021 you can afford to be choosy and bide your time.
The Fed raising interest rates was a financial windfall for many companies and investors.....and likely rather inflationary. LOL! If the Fed did nothing, inflation may have come down even quicker.
 
Well if you hold that cash in short term treasuries making 5.2% as opposed to probably 1.2% from 2009-2021 you can afford to be choosy and bide your time.
He often has had a pile of cash regardless of rates and he deploys it if he sees opportunity. If not then he just sits on it.

I never have thought he felt compelled to make a move just because he’s sitting on a ton of money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU in IM
For the layperson like myself, stick with big tech imo especially a MSFT. AMD as well if companies want to diversify from just one supplier. Broadcom maybe.

It’s not much different than biotech imo. If you’re not in the know it’s hard to know which smaller player will come up with the next big thing. If they do, the big guys will come around and buy them out to eliminate the competition or use their tech.

Intel is making a move to expand manufacturing to competitors like AMD, MS, Samsung and others . CEO Pat Gelsinger is jumping on the AI bandwagon and highlighting the need to bring manufacturing "back to the West."

Gelsinger was an engineering exec at Intel up to around 2009. He returned as CEO a couple years ago. Intel was in cycle of demise and lost Apple because it couldn't keep cpu manufacturing on schedule. Intel's 10nm processors were said to be functionally equal to TSMC's 7nm but Intel cpus ran hotter and power hungrier. Enterprise ignored them (more expensive to run/cool) for AMD cpus.

Now Intel said its introducing the "angstrom era" (smaller than nanometers) and is on rack for 18 angstroms soon and 14A in 2026.

Intel of course manufactured its own products with its own expensive "fabs." AMD doesn't make its own stuff and some chips were even made in upstate NY.

Its been sad to watch Intel decay but Geslinger might be onto the right track (which is still kinda hype prone) with the fabrication shift. Geslinger is more believable than the former crews




 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-05
Intel is making a move to expand manufacturing to competitors like AMD, MS, Samsung and others . CEO Pat Gelsinger is jumping on the AI bandwagon and highlighting the need to bring manufacturing "back to the West."

Gelsinger was an engineering exec at Intel up to around 2009. He returned as CEO a couple years ago. Intel was in cycle of demise and lost Apple because it couldn't keep cpu manufacturing on schedule. Intel's 10nm processors were said to be functionally equal to TSMC's 7nm but Intel cpus ran hotter and power hungrier. Enterprise ignored them (more expensive to run/cool) for AMD cpus.

Now Intel said its introducing the "angstrom era" (smaller than nanometers) and is on rack for 18 angstroms soon and 14A in 2026.

Intel of course manufactured its own products with its own expensive "fabs." AMD doesn't make its own stuff and some chips were even made in upstate NY.

Its been sad to watch Intel decay but Geslinger might be onto the right track (which is still kinda hype prone) with the fabrication shift. Geslinger is more believable than the former crews




Intel for quite some time has been a 1 step forward 1-2 steps backward company. That somewhat even pre-dates when Lisa Su took the helm at AMD and they kind of had a monopoly on things

I do think there's possibly some potential in bringing manufacturing on shore but that might be some time til we see if there's substantial fruit there. As far as tech advances etc..I'm skeptical when it comes to INTC delivering and capitalizing on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-05 and T2Kplus20
Intel for quite some time has been a 1 step forward 1-2 steps backward company. That somewhat even pre-dates when Lisa Su took the helm at AMD and they kind of had a monopoly on things

I do think there's possibly some potential in bringing manufacturing on shore but that might be some time til we see if there's substantial fruit there. As far as tech advances etc..I'm skeptical when it comes to INTC delivering and capitalizing on it.
Got to be skeptical of INTC until they prove it. They have been in the wilderness for quite a while.
 
BEAM and RXRX are both jumping. Call options are making a ton of money
Outstanding earnings report for BEAM! All 7 of my small cap biotechs are doing well, but I missed out on BEAM. At least for the time being.

Are you involved with BTC or the etfs at all? I was hoping the etfs would get options by now, but nothing so far. I might have to jump into MARA calls during the next dip.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT