Having poor games in 10/33 is expected in almost every sport and probably like.
Batting title winners probably bat .200 in their worst 30% games
Batting title winners probably bat .200 in their worst 30% games
You deliberately cherry picked stats to make it seem like wasn’t a good playerI never dismissed his clutch game winning shots on the road vs NW & Purdue, his overall good play on the road(minus @ Miami, @ ILL, & @ Mich St games) or even that defensive play but he was also that same player that shrunk, not stepped up, after Mawot Mag went down for the season or how poorly he played in our 10 home games(1 MSG) vs B1G opponents compared to his season stats. His stats got padded a lot vs the Sisters of the Poor teams, playing 6 sub 300 NET teams.
Home (6-4)
Indiana 1-5, 1-3, 3pts, W
MD, 3-10, 3-6, 13pts, W 4 FTs
Iowa, 4-10, 3-6, 13pts, L 2 FTs
Ohio St 5-13, 2-7, 21pts, W 9 FTs
Penn St 1-7, 1-3, 3 pts, W
Minnesota, 5-6, 3-3, 17pts, W 4 FTs
Mich St(MSG) 1-8, 0-5, 7 pts, W 5 FTs
Nebraska 3-11, 2-6, 8 pts, L
Michigan 5-12, 1-3, 11 pts, L
NW, 2-5, 1-3, 9pts, L 4 FTs
10 games, FG 30-87 34.5%, 3pt 17-45 37.8%, 2pt 13-42 30.9%, 10.5 pts
Without stats vs a horrible Minnesota team at home
9 games FG 25-81 30.9%, 3pt 14-42 33%
Those are stats of a limited offensive player vs quick athletic or physical guards in the B1G.
Better than the current version of Simpson, Griffiths and Williams in what regard? Creating your own shot and drawing fouls by attacking the paint? Running the fast break? On ball defense? Ballhandling vs pressure defense? Other than making open 3's, and Gavin is close in that department, I can't see it. Also, you're not just playing players for today but giving them experience for what they will become. In terms of what the players offer today combined with future upside, I don't trade any of those three for Cam.I don’t think hawks far off here, but that doesn’t diminish the fact that Spencer is better than the current version of Simpson, Griffiths, and Williams.
Is it wrong to leave for money? Not sure why people are so bitter. This is officially a business.Cam definitely hit big shots for us. He also had 2 turnovers and a critical missed FT in the last minute at Minnesota last year. That loss killed our NCAA chances. That said, he is a very solid college player and of course would make us better this year.
One side note though — there’s a whole lot of revisionist history going on here. Cam didn’t leave to go chase a championship. He was out the door no matter what and pretty much set to go to a bad G’Town team before UConn threw him a bag. This idea that he only left to win is fiction. He wanted out.
There is a difference between calling him average player and what I call him a limited offensive player based on quality of opponent or the quality of guard play from the opponent.You deliberately cherry picked stats to make it seem like wasn’t a good player
In the B1G tournament game against Michigan for example, was he great from three? No, he was 2-6. However he went 6-11 from the field and finished with 18 points with no turnovers. I’m honestly not gonna dig any deeper. If you think Cam is an average offensive player like Hawk, then you’re are delusional.
for 2023-24 I'd trade all 3.Better than the current version of Simpson, Griffiths and Williams in what regard? Creating your own shot and drawing fouls by attacking the paint? Running the fast break? On ball defense? Ballhandling vs pressure defense? Other than making open 3's, and Gavin is close in that department, I can't see it. Also, you're not just playing players for today but giving them experience for what they will become. In terms of what the players offer today combined with future upside, I don't trade any of those three for Cam.
For last night's Cam stat line?for 2023-24 I'd trade all 3.
And also lost is that shooters have bad nights or can be streaky at times.
If someone shoots 44% from beyond the arc of course they’re gonna have some games where they don’t even come close to that clip….and some games where they’re lights out.
No average player starts at UConn and Spencer prior to Seton Hall was averaging 16 points a game.You deliberately cherry picked stats to make it seem like wasn’t a good player
In the B1G tournament game against Michigan for example, was he great from three? No, he was 2-6. However he went 6-11 from the field and finished with 18 points with no turnovers. I’m honestly not gonna dig any deeper. If you think Cam is an average offensive player like Hawk, then you’re are delusional.
Is it wrong to leave for money? Not sure why people are so bitter. This is officially a business.
This thread is insane
And sad that all it took was a bad loss to SHU for all the bad takes on Cam to resurface
Please explain all the bad takes after the SHU loss. The debate has been reasonable. Only one poster probably slightly off in his take.
I never dismissed his clutch game winning shots on the road vs NW & Purdue, his overall good play on the road(minus @ Miami, @ ILL, & @ Mich St games) or even that defensive play but he was also that same player that shrunk, not stepped up, after Mawot Mag went down for the season or how poorly he played in our 10 home games(1 MSG) vs B1G opponents compared to his season stats. His stats got padded a lot vs the Sisters of the Poor teams, playing 6 sub 300 NET teams.
Home (6-4)
Indiana 1-5, 1-3, 3pts, W
MD, 3-10, 3-6, 13pts, W 4 FTs
Iowa, 4-10, 3-6, 13pts, L 2 FTs
Ohio St 5-13, 2-7, 21pts, W 9 FTs
Penn St 1-7, 1-3, 3 pts, W
Minnesota, 5-6, 3-3, 17pts, W 4 FTs
Mich St(MSG) 1-8, 0-5, 7 pts, W 5 FTs
Nebraska 3-11, 2-6, 8 pts, L
Michigan 5-12, 1-3, 11 pts, L
NW, 2-5, 1-3, 9pts, L 4 FTs
10 games, FG 30-87 34.5%, 3pt 17-45 37.8%, 2pt 13-42 30.9%, 10.5 pts
Without stats vs a horrible Minnesota team at home
9 games FG 25-81 30.9%, 3pt 14-42 33%
Those are stats of a limited offensive player vs quick athletic or physical guards in the B1G.
It’s not one bad game. He sucked against SHU in a L last year also.This thread is insane
And sad that all it took was a bad loss to SHU for all the bad takes on Cam to resurface
Shaheen’s figured out how to shut Cam down … guard him.It’s not one bad game. He sucked against SHU in a L last year also.
It’s not one bad game. He sucked against SHU in a L last year also.
The entire season's lines. The good, bad and average.For last night's Cam stat line?
Cam IS everything we hoped Gavin would be.I understand what njhawk is saying but Spencer is not an average player because he's an elite shooter. On a team where he has to be the go to player he may not look as good some nights because he can't get away from defenders. But on a team like uconn hes an elite shooting threat.
Nah, I'm hoping Griffiths will come into his own. He's 6'7" athletic, can be an elite shooter. If he develops his one on one moves and gains confidence he's on a whole different level than what Spencer is.Cam IS everything we hoped Gavin would be.
Better than the current version of Simpson, Griffiths and Williams in what regard? Creating your own shot and drawing fouls by attacking the paint? Running the fast break? On ball defense? Ballhandling vs pressure defense? Other than making open 3's, and Gavin is close in that department, I can't see it. Also, you're not just playing players for today but giving them experience for what they will become. In terms of what the players offer today combined with future upside, I don't trade any of those three for Cam.
I still can’t get over this post and that you’d trade Cam for Simpson and Williams.Better than the current version of Simpson, Griffiths and Williams in what regard? Creating your own shot and drawing fouls by attacking the paint? Running the fast break? On ball defense? Ballhandling vs pressure defense? Other than making open 3's, and Gavin is close in that department, I can't see it. Also, you're not just playing players for today but giving them experience for what they will become. In terms of what the players offer today combined with future upside, I don't trade any of those three for Cam.
This I don't agree with. Gavin has a much higher upside than Cam, has better size, and should be better balanced scoring across all levels.Cam IS everything we hoped Gavin would be.
I am hoping too.....the reality is Gavin's offense isn't hurting him. It his defense. Until he improves his defense Cam Spencer and Gavin Griffiths shouldn't be in the same sentence (although I just did it).Nah, I'm hoping Griffiths will come into his own. He's 6'7" athletic, can be an elite shooter. If he develops his one on one moves and gains confidence he's on a whole different level than what Spencer is.
Gavin has the ability to create his own shot, create for others, come flying around the court and come off a screen and make a defender pay for not getting through a screen.This I don't agree with. Gavin has a much higher upside than Cam, has better size, and should be better balanced scoring across all levels.
Maybe what we hoped he would be across the first 10-15 games of his career? The jury is still very much out on what he will round into later in the season.
Gavin has the ability to create his own shot, create for others, come flying around the court and come off a screen and make a defender pay for not getting through a screen.
Cam can do none of that......we agree.
Cam is a poor on ball defender, we both know that. With that being said he does other things on the defensive end that keep him from being a raging liability. Maybe Gavin improves this year, hopefully next year but as it stands right now unless he is making a HUGE impact offensively he is unplayable. His D and defensive rebounding is that bad.
As far as next year we will Have Ace and Dylan who both appear can create their own shot. Unless Ace and Dylan come in as plus defenders (which is HIGHLY unlikely) I am having a tough time envisioning how gavin adds all that much. Yes it is a huge advantage to have a player on the court who will make open 3s and whose defender can't help.
One bad game where the entire UConn team was shit and people pounce....yes its insane and predictable
Cam is a 5th year senior and Gavin is less than one year removed from high school. I would hope he might be better today. That being said, Gavin's ceiling is higher, probably much higher. Let's compare notes in a couple years.Cam IS everything we hoped Gavin would be.
This is a good point and why it was a priority to give meaningful minutes to Gavin, Simpson and JMike rather than one year players like Cam and Mulcahy. Dylan and Ace may very well be one and done's. We need to put ourselves in a position to, not only make the NCAA's, but do some damage. You need veterans to complement freshman ... no matter how elite they are.A big risk we have for next year is veteran leadership - having a voice who's "been there before", who can settle things down when necessary, and can impart the team/culture elements that are important for building chemistry. I'm hoping that will be a senior Mag and junior Simpson.
Cam IS everything we hoped Gavin would be.
This is comical. Of course Gavin will improve by end of year. I’m sure Cam improved in his first year playing for Loyola.Gavin has the ability to create his own shot, create for others, come flying around the court and come off a screen and make a defender pay for not getting through a screen.
Cam can do none of that......we agree.
Cam is a poor on ball defender, we both know that. With that being said he does other things on the defensive end that keep him from being a raging liability. Maybe Gavin improves this year, hopefully next year but as it stands right now unless he is making a HUGE impact offensively he is unplayable. His D and defensive rebounding is that bad.
As far as next year we will Have Ace and Dylan who both appear can create their own shot. Unless Ace and Dylan come in as plus defenders (which is HIGHLY unlikely) I am having a tough time envisioning how gavin adds all that much. Yes it is a huge advantage to have a player on the court who will make open 3s and whose defender can't help.
Jamichael Davis seems to have become that guy this year.But Spencer was also a poor on-ball defender, though I agree that last year he was ahead of where Griffiths is now. He made up for it by being very savvy about playing passing lanes for steals, playing great team/help defense, and having others on the team who played great team/help defense. I see Griffiths having a higher upside than Spencer defensively, too, once he gets more comfortable with game speed at this level (and as the team builds more chemistry with communication and help defense).
Expectations for next year are high, because we'll have legitimate scoring options at multiple positions - which isn't something we're used to. Griffiths will have a year's worth of reps under his belt and an offseason worth of practicing and film review, and should complement what the freshman class is bringing in.
A big risk we have for next year is veteran leadership - having a voice who's "been there before", who can settle things down when necessary, and can impart the team/culture elements that are important for building chemistry. I'm hoping that will be a senior Mag and junior Simpson.
While Davis brings a lot of composure for a freshman, unless knock off some ranked opponents, get a couple of games in the conference tournament, and make the dance, he won't have " been there before" in the same way that someone like Mag has.Jamichael Davis seems to have become that guy this year.
I know what you're saying but as far as being a vocal leader. Idk if that's Mags personality; when I watch the games I see Davis being the most vocal of all the players, upper class men included. Maybe the guy that's ineligible right now is more of that guy but it seems like Davis is the only one for now..While Davis brings a lot of composure for a freshman, unless knock off some ranked opponents, get a couple of games in the conference tournament, and make the dance, he won't have " been there before" in the same way that someone like Mag has.
There's a decent chance that the only players on next year's team who will have had two prior years in a Rutgers uniform will be Mag, Simpson, and Woolf.