What is the appeal about?Article says if the appeal goes through he could be playing as early as this year.
Hairball is gonna be pist.Article says if the appeal goes through he could be playing as early as this year.
Hairball is gonna be pist.
Edit:Story says he is filing an appeal and also fighting for a hardship waiver, which would get him on the field this season, but is unlikely. Typically in conference transfers need to sit 2 years. So would the regular appeal get him on the field next season?
Hairball is gonna be pist.
Edit:Story says he is filing an appeal and also fighting for a hardship waiver, which would get him on the field this season, but is unlikely. Typically in conference transfers need to sit 2 years. So would the regular appeal get him on the field next season?
That was my understanding, too. But the way it is worded in the article is that B1G interconference transfer rules are that the player loses two years of eligibility, not that he has to sit for two years. He has to sit one year due to NCAA FBS transfer rules. But the way I'm reading the article, the player can play the next year, he just loses another year of eligibility so that his college career will be over in three years.
From the article:
Per Big Ten transfer rules, Mitchell will have to sit out the 2016 season, and will lose an additional year of eligibility, in order to transfer home. That would leave him with three years to play three.
Question: Is the losing an year for in conference transfer immediate or just in general. Meaning, he has to sit out 2 years straight? Or does he just lose a year (let's say he doesn't play his Senior season).
He has a rs so only loses 1yrThat was my understanding, too. But the way it is worded in the article is that B1G interconference transfer rules are that the player loses two years of eligibility, not that he has to sit for two years. He has to sit one year due to NCAA FBS transfer rules. But the way I'm reading the article, the player can play the next year, he just loses another year of eligibility so that his college career will be over in three years.
From the article:
Per Big Ten transfer rules, Mitchell will have to sit out the 2016 season, and will lose an additional year of eligibility, in order to transfer home. That would leave him with three years to play three.
take him..we need talent and speed..Ash will get him to think TEAM first..and more Timber Creek guys!
Wow, no evidence he was either.I thought we were trying to move away from drug users and petty criminals... Oh well. It was a nice thought while it lasted.
Whatever is takes. We aren't in the Patriot League dude. We are up against OSU, PSU and Mich and Nebraska.I thought we were trying to move away from drug users and petty criminals... Oh well. It was a nice thought while it lasted.
Not for nothing but if Harbaugh has already decided this guy is not any good, then are we sure we want him? Sounds like Kiy Hester, or that dude from South Carolina and the numerous other high rated transfers that don't pan out.Harbough probably made an excuse to kick him off to have more room for higher potential recruits. He saw that he wouldn't make it there. I suspect there will be 1-2 more NJ recruits that won't make it there. I don't expect him to be a 4 star but maybe a 3 star recruit.
Man, lose 2 years of eligibility? I had always thought it was just having to sit for 2 years. Losing 2 years would be a deal breaker for me.That was my understanding, too. But the way it is worded in the article is that B1G interconference transfer rules are that the player loses two years of eligibility, not that he has to sit for two years. He has to sit one year due to NCAA FBS transfer rules. But the way I'm reading the article, the player can play the next year, he just loses another year of eligibility so that his college career will be over in three years.
From the article:
Per Big Ten transfer rules, Mitchell will have to sit out the 2016 season, and will lose an additional year of eligibility, in order to transfer home. That would leave him with three years to play three.
I thought we were trying to move away from drug users and petty criminals... Oh well. It was a nice thought while it lasted.
Wow, no evidence he was either.
Whatever is takes. We aren't in the Patriot League dude. We are up against OSU, PSU and Mich and Nebraska.
![]()
Not for nothing but if Harbaugh has already decided this guy is not any good, then are we sure we want him? Sounds like Kiy Hester, or that dude from South Carolina and the numerous other high rated transfers that don't pan out.
Almost rather he got caught smoking weed.
Hester is playing.Not for nothing but if Harbaugh has already decided this guy is not any good, then are we sure we want him? Sounds like Kiy Hester, or that dude from South Carolina and the numerous other high rated transfers that don't pan out.
Almost rather he got caught smoking weed.
Only one of the above mentioned is still listed on the team.The two players you mentioned are working or worked out well for the program. I wish RU was at the point that we don't even think about bringing someone in this situation in; however, RU is not even close to that point yet.
Well hopefully he learned from whatever caused him to get kicked off the team. Harbaugh is a tough dude and expects his players and personnel around him to hold themselves to high standards. Ash is really no different, I would think, so if Mitchell comes here he'll also need to hold himself up to high standards as a teammate, as a student, and as a player.Yeah... I've seen him play in person. Obviously he's talented but didn't appear to be a great teammate. Couple that with someone essentially getting kicked off the UM team within 7 months is pretty extreme.
I'm not thrilled but intrigued.
Let's see him work with the team for a year but not be eligible to play in 2016.
Let's see him make the 2 deep heading into summer camp of 2017.
Bo was a better and more feared player as a junior when they were on the same team and I expect the same will be true next year and moving forward.
Man, lose 2 years of eligibility? I had always thought it was just having to sit for 2 years. Losing 2 years would be a deal breaker for me.
However if one of those years is a rs season, then not as big a deal. Seems odd that that would be the case. To me losing 2 years means you only have 2 years to play.
If you think a kid is not Div 1 caliber you push him out after a season (You need all the tackling dummies as possible). During the season you make the kid feel underappriciated and quiet uncomfortable day in an day out until he gets the drift - "They hate me, I best just leave after the bowl game." Happens all the time.Harbough probably made an excuse to kick him off to have more room for higher potential recruits. He saw that he wouldn't make it there. I suspect there will be 1-2 more NJ recruits that won't make it there. I don't expect him to be a 4 star but maybe a 3 star recruit.
Only one of the above mentioned is still listed on the team.
Wrong. Hester is an impact player. Started 7 games last year, will play this year and most likely start the next two years.Our fanbase never learns.
No thank you. A school isn't just going to let a talented player go.
I'll make a list for you guys of all the transfers (not grad, not JUCO) that were impact players here:
Done.
And ironically its a similar situation where the player left without playing a game.Wrong. Hester is an impact player. Started 7 games last year, will play this year and most likely start the next two years.
We literally lose FIVE of our top WR's after this year (Grant, Agudosi, Patton, Matthews, Tsimis - ALL seniors). Some of the young guys look promising - Bailey, Harris, Jabbie, maybe Blunt as well - but if you're at all comfortable with our WR situation for next year you're crazy. Mitchell would be a massive addition.