ADVERTISEMENT

Poll: IF we miss the tournament, is it time to fire Pike?

Fire Pike?

  • Yes, immediately

  • No, let the new AD decide after one more season

  • No, he has earned the right to finish out his contract or leave on his own terms


Results are only viewable after voting.

kt124

Senior
Gold Member
Jun 28, 2021
1,848
2,877
113
Assuming that we don’t put out the dumpster fire that this season has become, where do we go from here?
 
The answer to such a question depends heavily on what the strategy for replacing him would be.

Are we paying up for an already proven winner? Or are we hiring another solid coach from a Stony Brook level program? Because the latter is just rolling the dice and I don’t see any reason to do that.
 
The answer to such a question depends heavily on what the strategy for replacing him would be.

Are we paying up for an already proven winner? Or are we hiring another solid coach from a Stony Brook level program? Because the latter is just rolling the dice and I don’t see any reason to do that.
we should be able to outbid any school outside the power 4 and a couple in the big east, so at the very least we could get an accomplished coach from the A-10 or AAC. we can also probably pay more than most Big 12 and ACC programs if we chose to do so. but I agree there’s no reason to hire another low major coach who took his program to the tournament one time.
 
I could understand choosing option 2 here, but it’s disheartening to see that many of you would be willing to put up with this indefinitely
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgersChow
we should be able to outbid any school outside the power 4 and a couple in the big east, so at the very least we could get an accomplished coach from the A-10 or AAC. we can also probably pay more than most Big 12 and ACC programs if we chose to do so. but I agree there’s no reason to hire another low major coach who took his program to the tournament one time.
Holloway and the Princeton coach are good places to start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freddy Stubbs
The answer to such a question depends heavily on what the strategy for replacing him would be.

Are we paying up for an already proven winner? Or are we hiring another solid coach from a Stony Brook level program? Because the latter is just rolling the dice and I don’t see any reason to do that.
This, exactly. If RU is not willing or able to commit to raising the level of this program from where Pikes has brought it, you might as well let him stay on. Don't fire the man just to hire a different coach of a similar profile, or worse.
 
I could understand choosing option 2 here, but it’s disheartening to see that many of you would be willing to put up with this indefinitely
The problem is that you didn’t have another option between 1 more year and finish out his contract.
If we have to choose between those 2 then obviously Pike has built up enough credibility to go beyond 1 more year.
 
we should be able to outbid any school outside the power 4 and a couple in the big east, so at the very least we could get an accomplished coach from the A-10 or AAC. we can also probably pay more than most Big 12 and ACC programs if we chose to do so. but I agree there’s no reason to hire another low major coach who took his program to the tournament one time.

How about run the numbers factoring in Pike's buyout as well as replacing the entire staff. Then factor in what might be an entire roster turnover including incoming recruits and the NIL that would be necessary to attract a respectable and competitive new roster. Also factor in first having to replace the President and AD. The real question is are we the type of fanbase that will quickly and readily fund all of this to build an immediate contender and avoid a 3 year rebuild to get back to current state and build from there?
 
How about run the numbers factoring in Pike's buyout as well as replacing the entire staff. Then factor in what might be an entire roster turnover including incoming recruits and the NIL that would be necessary to attract a respectable and competitive new roster. Also factor in first having to replace the President and AD.
this is not my job, but if we’re gonna be a B1G athletic program you can’t worry too much about the cost of hiring and firing staff, barring extremely high buyouts, which pike does not have anymore with Hobbs out
 
Pike sucks because he doesn’t run an offense. Let’s hire the guy with.. the #298 offense.

Chow is not a person to be taken seriously.

And Mitch Henderson coached a hell of one game. Let’s give him the keys to the program over the guy who dragged this program out of a flaming dumpster and put together 4 tournament worthy seasons. Not a serious poster at all.
 
This team was 1.25 minutes, 4 points away from being 9-2, with 2 wins over top 20 teams! What the hell is the matter with some people?
we are losing games (Kennesaw, Princeton) and barely holding in games (ND, Seton Hall) that we should be winning by double digits. pike has made a mess out of a team that has two nba lottery picks for the first time in program history
 
And Mitch Henderson coached a hell of one game. Let’s give him the keys to the program over the guy who dragged this program out of a flaming dumpster and put together 4 tournament worthy seasons. Not a serious poster at all.

Henderson seems like a reasonable candidate if we found ourselves without a coach but not the kind of splash hire that would make me interested in pulling the plug now.
 
And Mitch Henderson coached a hell of one game. Let’s give him the keys to the program over the guy who dragged this program out of a flaming dumpster and put together 4 tournament worthy seasons. Not a serious poster at all.
I’ll give you 3 tourney worthy seasons with the Covid year but I’m not giving Pike credit for failing to be selected
 
Henderson seems like a reasonable candidate if we found ourselves without a coach but not the kind of splash hire that would make me interested in pulling the plug now.

After 14 seasons at Princeton, you’ve also gotta wonder why he hasn’t been plucked by a bigger program. Or if he’s just happy with the stability and reasonable expectations of the fan base.
 
what makes you think that? we’re barely even competing for a bid right now

Next year we will have continuity and experience. And 3 4*s. The doom and gloom really doesn’t match reality.

We have 3 players with 1 year of experience and 2 of those guys were out. The other 9 guys are new. It’s not easy to get 12 guys on the same page right away.
 
Yeah depending on how this year finishes out I wouldn't be surprised if next year's team is better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUPete
we have gotten worse in each of the last three seasons so why is next year going to turn things around?
I don't agree with the premise.

Quite frankly the 2022-23 team was better than the 2021-22 team but I expect you will hard disagree on that.

But even leaving that aside this years' team is better than last years'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cm_13
we have gotten worse in each of the last three seasons so why is next year going to turn things around?

I don't agree with the premise.

Quite frankly the 2022-23 team was better than the 2021-22 team but I expect you will hard disagree on that.

But even leaving that aside this years' team is better than last years'.
Regardless...

I'm not necessarily predicting we are better next year. In this day and age of the transfer portal it's hard to predict much of anything before seeing the roster. But if we manage to hold more of the roster together than we have the past couple years I expect a huge improvement on defense. Most of Pike's teams AT STONY BROOK were better defensively than our current team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUGiddy777
Not really, unless to you the "result" is literally just what the tournament committee says.
yes, the only results I generally care about are whether we make/miss the tournament and how we perform in it. of course, I’d also like to compete for B1G championships but I’m more concerned with getting to the big dance on a near-annual basis
 
yes, the only results I generally care about are whether we make/miss the tournament and how we perform in it. of course, I’d also like to compete for B1G championships but I’m more concerned with getting to the big dance on a near-annual basis

Okay. But when you insist that a team that was rated significantly better by every single rating system I can find was in fact worse, you lose your credibility in the conversation.

The kind of person who forms their complete opinion of a team based on its performance in one single elimination tournament instead of evaluating it holistically is not well equipped to make decisions on these things.
 
Okay. But when you insist that a team that was rated significantly better by every single rating system I can find was in fact worse, you lose your credibility in the conversation.

The kind of person who forms their complete opinion of a team based on its performance in one single elimination tournament instead of evaluating it holistically is not well equipped to make decisions on these things.
I’ll accept your well proven point that 2022-2023 was statistically a better team than the prior year, but then why couldn’t Pikiell manage it well enough to make the tournament? Whether his team is 40th or 80th in KenPom, Pike will find a way to achieve mediocre results. Our best regular seasons have still had us squarely on the bubble.
 
Okay. But when you insist that a team that was rated significantly better by every single rating system I can find was in fact worse, you lose your credibility in the conversation.

The kind of person who forms their complete opinion of a team based on its performance in one single elimination tournament instead of evaluating it holistically is not well equipped to make decisions on these things.
But the whole sport and industry is based on what happens in that single elimination tournament and getting into that tournament

Pike was very good at stony Brook. But never made the tournament . Until he did ….and then got a big promotion that week
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkcheck
First, Pikes isn't going anywhere after this season. But, second, if your ideas to replace him are Holloway or Henderson, I'm pretty sure you don't watch much college hoops beyond Rutgers. First off, I highly doubt either come here--particularly Holloway who turned down a couple of bigger names last year to stay at SHU. Secondly, there are so many coaches out there--but if we fire the one guy who has done it here in the last 30 years, I wonder who would even be interested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHUSource
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT