ADVERTISEMENT

Rene to UNC

what exactly has come out on the football side of things (new stuff) since they were first reprimanded (loss of bowl game, stripped of some scholly's among other things) by the NCAA? Tell us since you have followed this so closely over the last five years. I'll hang up and listen ...

Seriously? You appear to be a Heel. Good for you. Now make an effort, sport. Google NCAA UNC Notice of Allegations, for a start. Find the doc. Read it. FB is named. Clearly. Then take a look at the Wainstein Report and the email attachments.
 
Seriously? You appear to be a Heel. Good for you. Now make an effort, sport. Google NCAA UNC Notice of Allegations, for a start. Find the doc. Read it. FB is named. Clearly. Then take a look at the Wainstein Report and the email attachments.

Sport, you didn't answer my question. Name me some NEW allegations against the football team that will get them banned from bowls, more scholly's lost ... Etc, etc, etc.
 
Sport, you didn't answer my question. Name me some NEW allegations against the football team that will get them banned from bowls, more scholly's lost ... Etc, etc, etc.
Sport, you didn't answer my question. Name me some NEW allegations against the football team that will get them banned from bowls, more scholly's lost ... Etc, etc, etc.

Make an effort. Read the NOA. And Go Heels!
 
That's what I thought.

Wow. This isn't TarHeel Blitz. But I'll play, just this once.

To summarize, borrowing from the Raleigh N&O, ... Wainstein's research found that over the 18-year period of his review, that athletes made up 1,871 of the enrollments in the "fake" paper classes. Of those enrollments, the football team accounted for 51.4 percent (963), the men's basketball team 12.1 percent (226) and the women's basketball team 6.1 percent (114).

The NCAA's curremt NOA cites UNC for a "lack of institutional" control, one of five Level 1 infractions leveled in that NOA. This makes the more recent NCAA investigation very different from the one five years ago, which began when the NCAA interviewed a handful of UNC football players, including current NFL players Marvin Austin, Greg Little and Robert Quinn, for taking improper gifts and benefits from sports agents.

I'll repeat: the old NCAA punishment was for taking improper gifts and benefits from SPORTS AGENTS.

So what's new and what UNC will be punished for (including FB) is the impermissible benefits of these unearned fake class grades, which kept these many athletes academically eligible.

As you may recall, the NCAA handed down its punishment in that "old" case in March 2012. UNC was placed on probation in that punishment, along with a one-year bowl ban and a loss of some scholarships.
 
Not sure what it means but Rashad McCants was at a table next to me a dinner a month or so ago. Dude speaks like a guy who never took a college course in his life.
 
Wow. This isn't TarHeel Blitz. But I'll play, just this once.

To summarize, borrowing from the Raleigh N&O, ... Wainstein's research found that over the 18-year period of his review, that athletes made up 1,871 of the enrollments in the "fake" paper classes. Of those enrollments, the football team accounted for 51.4 percent (963), the men's basketball team 12.1 percent (226) and the women's basketball team 6.1 percent (114).

The NCAA's curremt NOA cites UNC for a "lack of institutional" control, one of five Level 1 infractions leveled in that NOA. This makes the more recent NCAA investigation very different from the one five years ago, which began when the NCAA interviewed a handful of UNC football players, including current NFL players Marvin Austin, Greg Little and Robert Quinn, for taking improper gifts and benefits from sports agents.

I'll repeat: the old NCAA punishment was for taking improper gifts and benefits from SPORTS AGENTS.

So what's new and what UNC will be punished for (including FB) is the impermissible benefits of these unearned fake class grades, which kept these many athletes academically eligible.

As you may recall, the NCAA handed down its punishment in that "old" case in March 2012. UNC was placed on probation in that punishment, along with a one-year bowl ban and a loss of some scholarships.

Broseph,

That's all I wanted you to say. It's already been stated and well said the fake classes are/were a school issue bc they involved non-athlete students as well. It isn't deemed an issue with the athletic department. The sooner you (and the rest of the ABC Crowd) understand that the better off your world will be. See, I tend to listen to people who accuratley predicted the wrong doing and then the punishment the NCAA levied the first time round (DG), so I'm gonna listen to him again; not the News and Disturber and Crackride. Now go kick rocks. In the words of REK - wasting time standing here, I gotta go. Let me know when you want to have a beer on Pennsylvania Ave at the bottle shop and tap room.
 
I do want to clarify a little - there will be some punishment doled out around this fine institution of higher learning courtesy of some lesser roads taken by more than one athletic team - mens and women. But don't look for any knockout blows from the football team at all. Wouldn't wager much on the mens bball team either.
 
Terrific posts, BeezerHeel. Good for ScarletNation to witness firsthand the Heel faithful's mindset and inability or reluctance to acknowledge the severity of UNC's transgressions, which have been so comprehensively documented. LOIC is the underlying offense wherein a system of cheating was established and allowed to meet the needs of the athletic department for more than two decades. The university benefited greatly as a result. Soon time to pay the piper. It will be significant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shields
Broseph,
fake classes are/were a school issue bc they involved non-athlete students as well. It isn't deemed an issue with the athletic department.

So if we buy your delusional premise your contention is that if the school is found to be harboring a fraudulent academic enterprise the athletic teams will go forward without any impact?

You do realize a requirement for NCAA membership is being "a four-year college or university...accredited by the appropriate regional accrediting agency "

Sure it's still unlikely that the accreditation will be pulled entirely but it was also unlikely that any flagship university would be put on probation. Low an behold despite assertions to the contrary from Heel boosters you are on academic probation by your accreditor.
 
I've been a resident of NC for 35 years and am very very familiar with our state's ACC schools. And I have been very closely following the UNC scandal through the various internal reviews up to the present.

If you have frequented ScarletNation over the last five years or so, you should be familiar with my UNC scandal updates. If you are offended, do not read my posts.

As for this thread, the context of my posts should be apparent and self-evident: UNC FB has successfully flipped a prized RU recruit. UNC and UNC athletics will soon pay the price for its 23+ years of cheating. Unfortunately, Rene will be impacted by the pending NCAA sanctions. It's not a matter of "if" UNC will be punished; it is a matter of the the extent of the punishment. My information and connectivity lead me to believe the punishment will be significant, very significant.

LOL. "Information and connectivity"

y8yg7.jpg
 
^^^probably what the guy running around with the 25-1 kill ratio on Battlefront looks like
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncboy10
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT