That why you should commit to a school, not a coach.Both schools lost their coaches. I know he decommitted from Uconn prior, but still. You can't question a recruit who leaves a school after the head coach leaves. That's a total game changer.
DE. 2 Star by the other service.Position? Rating? Is he a take for Rutgers?
a little lost, agreed. but at 17-18, who really knows where to go. Hopefully whatever he chooses it works out. I noticed he had Navy on his list, great program but also a military commitment after cfb, tough choice if you are on the fence about a commitment
That why you should commit to a school, not a coach.
That why you should commit to a school, not a coach.
That why you should commit to a school, not a coach.
In 2017, who the head coach is, IS the program/school.
Ryan Mallett was at Michigan where the ran a pro-style offense. They subsequently hired Rich Rodriguez who ran a spread offense which basically rendered Mallett useless. Saying that a player should keep his commitment when the school or the coach didn't keep theirs is insane.
That why you should commit to a school, not a coach.
This proves my point.Totally unrealistic. These kids spend what amounts to a full time job with their future in these coaches hands. The coach absolutely matters. It especially matters when the coach you committed to leaves. You have no idea about the new coach, if they really want you, systems, anything. Maybe they are just taking you because you committed, who knows.
The reality is for these kids that a coach matters as much if not more than the school.
Red Spartan, you sure you're not Orange Julius?This proves my point.
well usually when you decommit its due to having gotten a better offer.
He had UConn then he upgraded to Temple. Maybe he got one from Syracuse or Rutgers