If Barchi and other higher-ups have a solution beside the merger, they have yet to say so. And yes, every school is down, but the sharp diminution we had after the Rowan affair means that we have been exceptionally hurt.Originally posted by NotInRHouse:
Aren't applications down across the board? Less people are willing to pay laughably increasing tuition for pathetically decreasing salaries. I was just talking to an intern at my office and she told me that most people at her pretty respected school are still graduating without jobs.
I thought the idea of the merger was to essentially prevent the RU law schools from competing with each other...which in the end should result in lower acceptance.
It is sad that the same Temple scholarship issue is in play...this was the case when I applied in the fall of 2006 and SHU was undercutting RU-N as well.
I guess my questions would be, are Barchi and other higher ups aware of the gravity of this phenonmenon, and what is their solution beyond the merger?
With Barchi's plan (as dictated by Trenton) to not take on more debt, who is going to step up? The obvious solution to me is a new, small, NB based school. Will RU take on debt for academics?
I would think the merger would make it less likely that the university would want an NB law school. Beside, law schools are o longer cash cows and so it is not in RU's interest to spend over $100 MM developing a new school.