I am thinking more like 1 in 10000. Almost a physical impossibility. gut wrenchingThat ball goes in maybe 1 out of 100 times
Lots of teams get beat on a full court pass with 3.3 secs left from the coffin corner on a bank shot 3?:confused:Lots of teams get beat on buzzer beaters. I mean, that one was particularly brutal, but I'm more pissed about that f*cking fake goaltend.
Overall, he's just a better player.This is part of the reason you need mcconnell in over tez. Mcconnell can get to the line and drill free throws
Shouldn’t we have had Johnson on the inbounder?
Fair point... it's brutal.Lots of teams get beat on a full court pass with 3.3 secs left in the coffin corner off a bank shot 3?:confused:
Gee look what I found. Beyond effin' lucky. Pike will rethink this and should have had someone like Myles on the inbounder. Still Iowa has now had two ridiculous wins. They're on the streak. And I'm still DAMN PROUD of our kids. The DESERVED TO WIN THIS _UCKIN' GAME!!!
How about a 1 in a 1,000 chance!Shouldve had johnson on the inbound and issa shouldve been in too. Regardless the shot was extremely ridiculous and had like a 3/100 shot of going in
Never seen a team bank in a 3 from the corner on a buzzer beater like that.
Sorry my Rutgers bros
Yes, that's the way every coach in America would have played it.Shouldn’t we have had Johnson on the inbounder?
How about a 1 in a 1,000 chance!Shouldve had johnson on the inbound and issa shouldve been in too. Regardless the shot was extremely ridiculous and had like a 3/100 shot of going in
How can Harper, Gene and Doorson not not able to know down a Hail Mary cross court pass!!? The odds of that play working are probably 1 in 1000. Unreal. And yes, pretty sure inbounder stepped in the court before throwing it
What are you talking about????!!!! It was one of the luckiest shots I've ever seen in 50 years! All I said was Pike will want to rethink this endgame strategy. Put a big man on the inbounder and possibly have Thiam in there too.As I've said a few times before - that was the best possible shot we could have asked for. The only type of shot we could have asked that would have been harder than that one was no shot at all. You could question the staff on many things, but saying they could have forced Iowa into a worse shot than that one isn't one.
You're underestimating McConnell's defense.Tez needs to make free throws but to his credit he is the one who got the steal and made the cut and catch.. both were tough plays. Just needs to make the FTs. Personally tez looked flustered today and I would have taken him out TODAY. However him in defense is much better than mcconnell
Yea this is pretty much as brutal as it gets. Only thing worse would be if he made the full shot. But even then we'd have like 3 secs to get a shot off at least.[laughing]Fair point... it's brutal.
What are you talking about????!!!! It was one of the luckiest shots I've ever seen in 50 years! All I said was Pike will want to rethink this endgame strategy. Put a big man on the inbounder and possibly have Thiam in there too.
I was wondering the same thing.Did the inbounded step onto the court on deep pass?
Worse than Danke from GWU and that cross court turnaround jumper in OT.Sure, and then they get a better percentage shot than the one they got. Look, that was an impossible shot which went in. This is a gut punch.
I don't think he did. I watched a replay from the actual play and it looked like his foot was fine. I could only watch once because I'm so mad though and it's pretty far away so I could be wrong.Did the inbounded step onto the court on deep pass?