ADVERTISEMENT

Rutgers vs Iowa / Game Thread

It is hard to question guarding the inbound pass when the ball was thrown directly into two Rutgers players who couldn’t grab/hit/punch/tap the ball back down the court... Pikiell got exactly what he wanted until his players whiffed
 
Yea this is pretty much as brutal as it gets. Only thing worse would be if he made the full shot. But even then we'd have like 3 secs to get a shot off at least.[laughing]

But what do I know. I'm still trying to figure out how you can grab someone unintentionally. In all my life I've never grabbed anyone unintentionally even when I was falling down. I knew if I grabbed them it would lesson my fall.
The official was the midget of the group who called several puzzling calls including waiving off Myles put back when on the replay it should the ball left the cylinder and was a good shot. We lost 2 points right there. Of course if we can learn how to be even slightly above average on the FT line we would have won this game even with the miracle three by Wieskemp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyrock3
1939:

You are correct. The ball was tossed the entire length of the court and it ends up in the corner in an Iowa players hands. Forget the shot, the 2 Rutgers guys should have come down with the ball or knocked it out of bounds.

You cannot allow that pass to be completed.
 
I would be fine with being below average at the FT line.
No, we have that down at 61%. How about we improve to 70%. That's all I'm asking for. Montez should shoot 10,000 FT's after the season is over. I guarantee you his percentage will go way up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyrock3
1939:

You are correct. The ball was tossed the entire length of the court and it ends up in the corner in an Iowa players hands. Forget the shot, the 2 Rutgers guys should have come down with the ball or knocked it out of bounds.

You cannot allow that pass to be completed.

Most of these players never played football. Any decent high school DB knows to play the man in these situations rather than the ball. We do that and we win.
 
I was wondering the same thing.les
You know they call that in Iowa if roles were reversed. Damn. Really thought RU was going to get it. Still some good news as PSU and Indy lost. If Nebraska loses to NW then RU still in 10th!!!!!​
 
You know they call that in Iowa if roles were reversed. Damn. Really thought RU was going to get it. Still some good news as PSU and Indy lost. If Nebraska loses to NW then RU still in 10th!!!!!​
It still hurts like hell. That was a win for us. Geo's shot should have been the game winner. Iowa is lucky as hell to leave the RAC with a win and they know it, especially that whiny bitch McCaffery.
 
It is hard to question guarding the inbound pass when the ball was thrown directly into two Rutgers players who couldn’t grab/hit/punch/tap the ball back down the court... Pikiell got exactly what he wanted until his players whiffed

Had the same thought. Even though shot was ugly, it was a really good look..probably best look they could have asked for. Wide open 3 from corner. Smh that the ball got through.
 
Mcaffery and the announcer are 90% of the reason why I am pissed we lost. They were so frustrating. If that is Izzo, beilien or painter it would be so much more tolerable
 
  • Like
Reactions: RW90
1939:

You are correct. The ball was tossed the entire length of the court and it ends up in the corner in an Iowa players hands. Forget the shot, the 2 Rutgers guys should have come down with the ball or knocked it out of bounds.

You cannot allow that pass to be completed.

Its just too easy for the ball to go where you want....with a guy guarding trajectory gets altered
 
That finish will be called surreal. Didn't get the luck today. We will someday.
 
I heard on the radio the winning 3 pointer was a bank shot, please say that's not true because that makes it worse. From our angle it's hard to tell if a shot has been banked in.
 
I’m at a wedding, so I’ve been following the score app and this board. I have the game dvr’d.
I’m sad. But if you’re a fan of Rutgers it’s hard to be too shocked.
 
I heard on the radio the winning 3 pointer was a bank shot, please say that's not true because that makes it worse. From our angle it's hard to tell if a shot has been banked in.
Sadly it was. And it was a weird bank, because Wieskemp, who shot the damn ball, it was so high up on the backboard that an inch to the left it may have hit the side of the board and doinked off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronnie_B
I heard on the radio the winning 3 pointer was a bank shot, please say that's not true because that makes it worse. From our angle it's hard to tell if a shot has been banked in.
Yup would have had to call the bank shot on the playground. Awful luck
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronnie_B
I heard on the radio the winning 3 pointer was a bank shot, please say that's not true because that makes it worse. From our angle it's hard to tell if a shot has been banked in.
It was banked in, which is hard to do on a shot from the corner. It was wide left and hit high on the backboard. Had it been wide right by an equivalent distance, it's an airball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU MAN
I heard on the radio the winning 3 pointer was a bank shot, please say that's not true because that makes it worse. From our angle it's hard to tell if a shot has been banked in.
I wish it were a standard bank shot.. it was shot from behind the basket from the corner of the court.. it barely scraped the top corner of the backboard.. and swished. Its almost like a FG that hits the upright and then the crossbar but bounces through.

I'm thinking it was almost illegal coming from behind the backboard and then over it.. but it hit the corner on the side.. not the top.
 
I wish it were a standard bank shot.. it was shot from behind the basket from the corner of the court.. it barely scraped the top corner of the backboard.. and swished. Its almost like a FG that hits the upright and then the crossbar but bounces through.

First it was a Hail Mary inbounds pass that RU defended well.

Then it had the misfortune to land perfectly outside the 3-point line and into the hands of an Iowa player.

Luck would have it the Iowa player it deflected too just happens of course to be a 45% 3 point shooter.

And finally for the kick in the balls he shot a brick that was saved by the backboard.

It really doesn't get any more heartbreaking than that.
 
Eff me. I DVR the game and added 15 min. It stopped right after Geo made the three (3 sec left). Was hoping to come here and confirmed the win and celebrate. That was the best game we played all year. Just ran into a better team. Keep developing and the wins will come.
 
Eff me. I DVR the game and added 15 min. It stopped right after Geo made the three (3 sec left). Was hoping to come here and confirmed the win and celebrate. That was the best game we played all year. Just ran into a better team. Keep developing and the wins will come.
According to some astrophysicists, if you are not there to observe it, it didn't happen.
 
First it was a Hail Mary inbounds pass that RU defended well.

Then it had the misfortune to land perfectly outside the 3-point line and into the hands of an Iowa player.

Luck would have it the Iowa player it deflected too just happens of course to be a 45% 3 point shooter.

And finally for the kick in the balls he shot a brick that was saved by the backboard.

It really doesn't get any more heartbreaking than that.
Add to that that Geo hit what would have gone down as one of the great buzzer beater 3s in RU history. Now it will hardly be remembered and he won’t get credit for the total clutch, ice in the veins shot
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronnie_B
Add to that that Geo hit what would have gone down as one of the great buzzer beater 3s in RU history. Now it will hardly be remembered and he won’t get credit for the total clutch, ice in the veins shot
Well, technically Geo shoot wasn't a buzzer beater, but it would have been one of most clutch 3s in RU history so I hear ya man.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT