Skillet, seriously? You say Brooks Robinson was a better player than Mike Schmidt? Matter of personal choice to some extent, but let us compare records. This is from Total Baseball, which stopped being published some 20 years ago.
Brooks Robinson 10654 AB 1232 R 2848 H 482 2B 68 3B 268 HR 1357 RBI 860 BB 990 K .267 BA .325 OBP .401 SP .726 OPS (best year, .895 in 1965. Batting runs-just 32, because he had negative batting runs 13 of his 23 seasons. Total Player rating 23.3
Mike Schmidt 8204 AB, some 2500 less than Brooksie. 1487 R 2704 H 401 2B 59 3B 542 HR (led the league 8 times) 1567 RBI (led the league 3 times) 1486 BB 1868 K .269 BA .386 OBP ( led the league 3 times) .530 SP (led the league 4 times) .916 OPS (led the league 5 times, including two years over 1,000). 563 batting runs (Brooks had 32) 77.9 Total Player Rating (led the league 8 times).
OK, you say, you concede Mike Schmidt was way more productive at bat (and stole several times more bases). But Brooks was a great fielder. Yes, he was, but---
Fielding Runs--Robinson, 134 Schmidt 241. Your Honor, the Crown rests its case.
Look, love Brooks Robinson. He did color on Oriole TV coverage (my community didn't have cable yet), with a savvy Jim Palmer as lead announcer. Brooksie was always down home, fun to listen to, rarely, if ever, critical. Like going to a game with the guy from work who plays 3rd base on the company softball team. His attention sometimes wandered. One day, Palmer fed him the perfect setup to allow Brooks to expound about infield play, saying he let the infield know how he was going to work a guy so they could position themselves. "You guys took cues from that, didn't you, Brooks?" And Brooks said, "Sorry, Jim--wasn't listening. I was thinking about them nachos". Great player, great guy--but no Mike Schmidt. Eddie Mathews might be closer to Schmidt as the greatest 3rd baseman ever, but having seen Schmidt in some 20 games up in Philly, he's my pick.
TL