RW90 said:
↑
I just hope the early parity in the league doesn't hurt it's national perception come selection Sunday.
The good news is that once you get into conference play the national narratives are mostly set.
This is why in football every year if a bottom SEC team upsets a top one, it's "wow the SEC is so strong top to bottom!" but if a Big Ten team does it then it's "that conference is just filled with mediocrity." The narrative of a strong SEC is practically ingrained in the sport.
In basketball it's less set in stone and more year to year. The Big Ten won their conference challenges with the ACC and the Big East so the narrative of a strong Big Ten is already set up. This is similar to last year and it's why Ohio State got in at 8-12 in the conference.
Case in point: Last night, Rutgers beat Penn State and Boston College beat Virginia. Each improved to 3-1 in their league. But since Rutgers had a convincing win over Seton Hall and Penn State had beaten Georgetown, Syracuse, Wake Forest, and Alabama, it means something.
Boston College's best non-conference win is South Florida, and they've lost to Belmont, DePaul, Saint Louis, Richmond, and Northwestern. When Virginia gets beat by a team with THAT resume, it's obviously not because Boston College is good.
[/quote]
Best quote I saw regarding BC: “BC is now 3-1 in league. If they finish over .500 the ACC should be a one bid league”. Ha.