Worst argument ever.
Please give me the notable win he had over the last 4 years? I’ll wait.
Worst argument ever.
He is a great coach although I am a little surprised with some of the losses this year but he is at a place where you can't stock talent and is breaking in a new qb. The team is still well coached though. I think he is a very good realistic get, and his price would leave room for great coordinators and recruiters.
Rutgers has been trying to save money for to long and that's what got the program where it is now and why it was bad BS (before Schiano) and AS (after Schiano)Yes Leipold has $1mill buyout but if we can get him for $1.5 mill a year v. $3 mill a year for Schiano or another name brand coach, we will be financially better. Build into the contract incentive riders and were gold.
I love Leipold. But not now. I think he's an excellent coach, but now, we need a charismatic coach (not just Greg) who can come in, fire up the recruits and still be a successful coach. I would put my money on Schiano, Jones and Candle over Lance, although for pure coaching, he's terrific.Lance Leipold is a real coach. He knows how to develop and motivate the talent he gets to play to a higher level. With Success the 4 and 5 *'s will come becuase they want a coach they can believe in. Lance Leipold has the "intangible" of getting the best out of his players. He has the "tangible" of winning records at every coaching gig he has had. He can build a Winning program at Rutgers. We need a guy who has that level of skill at coach.
Last season the Bulls posted a program-best 10-4 record, the first time Buffalo has hit the 10-win mark since joining the FBS ranks in 1998. In 2017, the Bulls finished with a 6-6 mark. Though they just missed a bowl game that year, Leipold was responsible for leading the program to back-to-back seasons with a .500 record or better. Another first for Buffalo.
For what it’s worth, Leipold’s Buffalo teams have actually been fairly competitive against B1G competition, too — more than what Rutgers has been since joining the league. The Bulls are just 1-3 against B1G teams (with the lone win coming over Rutgers, ironically), but they’ve fought well in each outing:
Remember, Buffalo had a 10-7 lead on the Nittany Lions at half time this year, too.
- 2015: at Penn State — L, 27-14
- 2017: at Minnesota — L, 17-7
- 2018: at Rutgers — W, 42-13
- 2019: at Penn State — L, 45-13
Leipold has accomplished all of this with recruiting classes that have ranked in the 100s in each of his five seasons. And while there might be concerns about his lack of success on the recruiting trail, his ability to win 10 games with that kind of talent should speak to his ability to develop players over time.
At a place like Rutgers, where you’ll continually lose recruiting battles to the likes of Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, Michigan State and maybe even Maryland, having a coach with exceptional development skills is important.
When the 2020 season kicks off, Leipold will be 56 years old, and his buyout from Buffalo is only $1 million. As a guy who started at the lowest level of NCAA football and worked his way into the FBS ranks, Rutgers would probably be his final stop. If it works out, the Scarlet Knights could have their coach for the next decade or longer.
no none of the sortI really think people like him so much because Buffalo killed us last year. Guys — we were like the worst team in the county last year.
If he is putting W’s on the board who cares where he is from, where he coached, yada, yada, yada. The guy has a system and can flat out coach. He is exactly what Rutgers needs. The last thing Rutgers needs is a slick salesman who can talk the talk but cant put W’s on the board. Lance has the skills to put Build Rutgers to prominence again.I love Leipold. But not now. I think he's an excellent coach, but now, we need a charismatic coach (not just Greg) who can come in, fire up the recruits and still be a successful coach. I would put my money on Schiano, Jones and Candle over Lance, although for pure coaching, he's terrific.
Like I said, I really do like him as a coach. But with that said, not right now for Rutgers. I just don't feel comfortable in him getting the recruits we need for the B1G. If we had a winning program already and that coached left, then yes, I could see him as the next coach. Unfortunately, we are starting over and I want someone that can really "sell" the program as well as coach. As much as I like and respect Leipold, I don't feel he's the right one at this time.If he is putting W’s on the board who cares where he is from, where he coached, yada, yada, yada. The guy has a system and can flat out coach. He is exactly what Rutgers needs. The last thing Rutgers needs is a slick salesman who can talk the talk but cant put W’s on the board. Lance has the skills to put Build Rutgers to prominence again.
this above writer at Saturday tradition, has zero idea what the program needs are..
He doesn’t ooze winning when he plays a team with a pulse. The guy doesn’t have one notable win at Buffalo in 4 years. Also, talk about WTF losses, he lost to Liberty a few weeks ago and can’t beat peer schools in year 4 of his regime (see loss to Miami Ohio last week).
so you think a Lance Liepold or Jason Candle,who is younger and better coach then Lancelot,are equal choices to Schiano,Butch Jones or Moorehead?He's a good coach, but I agree with this at this point. Buffalo beat Temple because of Temple turnovers whereas Miami beat Buffalo largely on Buffalo's four turnovers. Essentially those games were lost more than they were won.
I'm open to seeing what he does over the next two weeks. Ohio should be a competitive game at home for Buffalo at 3:30 Saturday. Akron is the worst team in the MAC and potentially the worst team in FBS (yes, worse than UMass). An 0-2 record and he's completely off my board. 2-0 and he's still on (but not high). 1-1 and he'd be hanging by a thread.
so you think a Lance Liepold or Jason Candle,who is younger and better coach then Lancelot,are equal choices to Schiano,Butch Jones or Moorehead?
what?
Let face facts no matter who we get unless it’s urban is going to be a crap shoot. It only a matter of how much we pay to roll the dice. Schiano is a good coach but he has negatives and positives just like any coach who will take the job. Lance Leipold in my opinion is a good coach who has upside to become a great coach. I would like to see him become a great coach at Rutgers. No matter who becomes HC I will root for their success in turning around the program.so you think a Lance Liepold or Jason Candle,who is younger and better coach then Lancelot,are equal choices to Schiano,Butch Jones or Moorehead?
what?
hes never coached at ,or won at same level,or ran a power five program,NFL team, as Schiano,Butch Jones or Moorehead have..Let face facts no matter who we get unless it’s urban is going to be a crap shoot. It only a matter of how much we pay to roll the dice. Schiano is a good coach but he has negatives and positives just like any coach who will take the job. Lance Leipold in my opinion is a good coach who has upside to become a great coach. I would like to see him become a great coach at Rutgers. No matter who becomes HC I will root for their success in turning around the program.
I haven't made my opinion at this point and I don't anticipate making one until Thanksgiving. I'm glad we're finally talking about experienced head coaches rather than trying to find the sexy coordinator. Coaches like Schiano, Jones, Moorhead, and Clawson (if he would listen) are fairly known quantities at this point. I think each will have varying degrees of success, but I'm not sold that either will get us where we really want to be unless you are ready to accept 5 -- 8 wins annually.
There are several G5 coaches who I believe could win more at RU than the established P5 coaches could. I have not done the homework I need to because the RU job was not vacant and they'd end up going to someplace else and be our nemesis for a decade or longer. This weekend would be a painful one for me if Locksley was a coach I wanted for RU (he wasn't).
Not sure that Schiano is a known quantity at this point. Ever since he left RU his resume has declined.
I see Greg as a huge risk for RU. He is not the same coach we had the last time around imo. Especially after the failure with the Pats.
hes never coached at ,or won at same level,or ran a power five program,NFL team, as Schiano,Butch Jones or Moorehead have..
Unfortunately, being the HC of a Power 5 football team is not just about X's and O's. It's getting the Jimmy's and Joe's to show up on campus to execute those X's and O's. Recruiting is almost as important as the gameday planning. Leipold can't outrecruit other teams in his group of 5 conference, can you expect him to go toe to toe with Durkin, Franklin, Ferentz, Day, and Harbaugh (and Partridge/Campanile) for NJ talent? Hell, he'll have trouble against Addazio and Carey. Plus, the added pressure of being in the NJ market and all the scrutiny of athletics at RU? I doubt it. Only experienced Power 5 head coaches and established, experienced high powered coordinators please.
Fans like Morrison and Andia want Rutgers to give Buffalo head coach Lance Leipold a chance after watching his Bulls carve up the Scarlet Knights a season ago, citing his ability to win at all levels and develop players as a head coach as major feathers in his cap.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/2019/09/rutgers-fans-are-done-with-chris-ash-after-latest-dejecting-loss-to-boston-college-get-rid-of-him.html?outputType=amp