Yeah ok blockhead whatever you say! Lance is the man.
Leipold instead of Schiano is a total head scratcher for me. nope
Yeah ok blockhead whatever you say! Lance is the man.
A I'm not sure Schiano would come back here for what Rutgers can pay. B. We don't know if he even wants to come back here.Leipold instead of Schiano is a total head scratcher for me. nope
again with the 55 year old lifelong Div 3 HC.Please stop.A I'm not sure Schiano would come back here for what Rutgers can pay. B. We don't know if he even wants to come back here.
C. overall I think Lance Leipold is a better coach, even with his loss to liberty. BTW, Rutgers may have all they can handle with liberty!
A I'm not sure Schiano would come back here for what Rutgers can pay. B. We don't know if he even wants to come back here.
C. overall I think Lance Leipold is a better coach, even with his loss to liberty. BTW, Rutgers may have all they can handle with liberty!
the pressure to win at Rutgers is , in a weird way, some of the highest pressure that exists in college football.
Ah NOPE, not even remotely close.
As diehard RU fans we way OVERESTIMATE our relevance. I have been I. SEC country for 25 years, college is King even over pro sports. even a year remived from National championship, teams will want coach gone after down year. VERY unrealistic expectations. we are generally happy with 6 wins and bowl appearances.
Part of Rutgers Riches is also its handicap. Rutgers is in the most media intense area in the USA. When we win we have the biggest platform in all of college football. When we lose, because we have something like 20 pro teams within a 100 mile radius of New Brunswick we have to compete against those teams for air time, fans, and most of all the fans money. I will take a coach who can get us to a bowl year in and year out.Some Bama fans wanted Saban fired because he lost one game... SABAN... FIRED... ONE... GAME...
Yeah,
At Rutgers, most of us just want to go bowling again...is that too much to ask?
That is a lot less pressure. Here you don't have to win all the games just win more than you lose, or at least go .500. Ash can't even do that.
The new HC, all he has to do is that and he would be considered a success by most people.
It has nothing to do with money. Les Mile’s time in Kansas will run out and things will soon go back to normal. We’re on a different mission here. We know our potential is something unique and the pressure to win at Rutgers is , in a weird way, some of the highest pressure that exists in college football.
We have to bring in people that know what the hell the mission is and truly care to make it happen. Money doesn’t mean $hi+
The pressure here has zapped us to the point where we don’t know what the hell we’re doing. Don’t know what’s right wrong good or bad. The most beaten, battered fan base in all of sports.Cant get my head around that one - Ash is 8-30 and there is an active debate about how many wins he needs to stay - and if he gets 5, he very likely will get another year. That is zero pressure to win
The pressure here has zapped us to the point where we don’t know what the hell we’re doing. Don’t know what’s right wrong good or bad. The most beaten, battered fan base in all of sports.
Skoolie, What do you not understand? We need a coach who can coach first. We could have all 5stars but if the coach cant coach that talent they wont be successful. Charlie Weis at Michigan is a case in point. We need a coach who has the intangibles of getting players to believe in their team and themselves. Lance has that ability.I appreciate Leipold's record. However, he built that D3 school on a ton of D1 washout transfers, a luxury he won't have. He also had an NFL QB at Buffalo most recently and an All-American WR. My biggest issue is he seems like another boring ass midwesterner who will not be able to relate to NJ folks. Hard pass on that. Yes, he can coach up his talent. It doesn't matter though if he's bringing a knife to a gun fight. We need a guy who can at least gets us to bring a gun to a gun fight. That was the #1 pre-requisite in 2015 and Hobbs whiffed on it. It's just as important now.
Skoolie, What do you not understand? We need a coach who can coach first. We could have all 5stars but if the coach cant coach that talent they wont be successful. Charlie Weis at Michigan is a case in point. We need a coach who has the intangibles of getting players to believe in their team and themselves. Lance has that ability.
Unless Rutgers is willing to make the commitment to pay a name brand coach $ 4- 6 million a year(I don't think they will even though I think it would be profitable if they did)to coach and recruit. We have to look outside the box for talent. Is it worth bringing Lance here on a 6 year contract and if like ash we are not seeing improvement by year 4, no renewal and we have a clause in the contract that we can start interviewing head coaching candidates. If after year 4 he has a record or a certain # of wins he gets renewed with bonuses for bowls and championships. We need to get the contract right to give us the opportunity to get the right coach.
I think lance has the intangibles that he can get the best out of his players no matter what division he is in. only time will tell, but I am willing to give him a shot as I like his style and his ability.
Just stop before you hurt yourself! Leipold wasn't born last night and the NJ market is no tougher than Buffalo. The guy came out of wisconsin a winner and he is in the process of building Buffalo into a winner. We can afford him because RU is not going to pay Urban Meyer to come here(it would be great if they did). I think Lance has the same coaches talents that Pikiell has at basketball which is getting the best out of his players given the talent level he can recruit at. If Lance is wildly successful here then the 4 and 5 stars will be willing to invest their talents for a coach who can win! No different for SAban, Meyer, Kelly two of whom coached in the MAC before going to bigger programs. I like him and I think he is worth the shot! JMO.You realize his recent ass whipping against PSU would happen every single week? Right? IDGAS if he can coach people up. If you can't recruit, you stand no chance in our division. We're not playing in the MAC where there is maybe 1 standard deviation in the talent level between all the schools in that conference. We're 2-3 standard deviations away from 4 teams we play religiously every single year. You're not going to coach up to that.
A 55 year old guy from Wisconsin who has put me to sleep in any Youtube video I have watched on him, is not going to recruit NJ well. He'll get eaten alive here. You need a big personality recruiting in NJ against this conference.
Brother Skinny,come clean,Just stop before you hurt yourself! Leipold wasn't born last night and the NJ market is no tougher than Buffalo. The guy came out of wisconsin a winner and he is in the process of building Buffalo into a winner. We can afford him because RU is not going to pay Urban Meyer to come here(it would be great if they did). I think Lance has the same coaches talents that Pikiell has at basketball which is getting the best out of his players given the talent level he can recruit at. If Lance is wildly successful here then the 4 and 5 stars will be willing to invest their talents for a coach who can win! No different for SAban, Meyer, Kelly two of whom coached in the MAC before going to bigger programs. I like him and I think he is worth the shot! JMO.
Rutgers staff could not beat Shirley Temple. That is not the point. Stop picking the low hanging fruit so that we don't have to eat from the ground. Aim higher.Div. III Head Coach Lance Leipolds Buffalo team just beat Temple 38-22. Do you think this Rutgers staff could beat temple?
6 D3 titles dont count.what if they can recruit but suck as a gameday coach?
Leopold sounds like the perfect coach if Rutgers was at the point they were when theye hired Flood. Instead, I don't think BrotherSkinny is admitting to himself how bereft of talent Rutgers is right now, especially on the lines.I appreciate Brother’s commitment to Lance. But, he’s simply not the answer here. Even assuming he’s a great coach, and I don’t think he would be at the P5 level, Rutgers has proven to be a unique job where being a good coach simply isn’t enough. We need part coach part salesman.
Why is he a Pass? I don’t understand.Pass..,
Although I will admit, the only current head coach we could possibly hire would come from a school playing at that level,
I don’t like his personality.Why is he a Pass? I don’t understand.
Why is he a Pass? I don’t understand.
AMHERST — Coach Lance Leipold challenged the University at Buffalo football team to respond after being “punched in the mouth” in last week’s loss at Liberty.
The Bulls rose off the mat and swung back at Temple on Saturday, relying on their running game and an opportunistic defense in a resounding 38-22 victory at UB Stadium that evened their record at 2-2 and restored confidence heading into next week’s Mid-American Conference opener.
“It’s a huge boost,” Leipold said afterward. “Morale was down a little bit last week and rightfully so. We got it handed to us.”
“Really challenged the group a little bit,” Leipold added. “They accepted that and worked hard and I’m really proud of the way they played.”
Two-touchdown underdogs against a Temple team that beat nationally-ranked Maryland last week, UB overcame an early deficit and scored 31 straight points in winning for the ninth time in its last 10 home games.
“Nothing that happened in this game is surprising for us,” said safety Joey Banks, who returned an interception for a 43-yard touchdown to put UB ahead 38-10 early in the fourth quarter. “We knew we were going to come in here and handle business. We were laser focused all week.”
“I stressed that we have to be relentless, committed and have pride in what we do every play,” said defensive captain Ladarius Mack, whose first quarter strip sack led to UB’s go-ahead touchdown early in the second quarter.
Coming into the game with no interceptions on the season, the UB secondary that struggled against Liberty last week picked off Temple quarterback Anthony Russo three times.
“We played as a unit, played as a team,” Banks said. “No one was out there being selfish, trying to make plays on their own. We let the plays come to us. It started up front. They were causing havoc up front, which trickled down to the secondary. The quarterback was just throwing money out there and we were taking it.”
https://www.lockportjournal.com/spo...cle_ee8d9ba8-c079-5d8c-82db-4e9d98ba7b20.html
Strange post Knightmoves?Some RU fans want to fall in love with our next HC. Leipold isn’t sexy enough for them. They want to be excited about the next hire. Like a young girl getting an offer to go to the prom.
The only thing I know is Lance Leipold got it done at Wisconsin- Whitewater...He is getting it done at Buffalo. He seems to be able to get the right talent he needs to beat Teams I would consider a step up from Buffalo. I think he could succeed here Because he is a good coach and kids want to play for good coaches. When he starts winning here, he will keep the NJ kids. This is just my opinion of course but I think he can win here at Rutgers and keep the talented NJ kids here.I don’t like his personality.
I could be very wrong, but when you come to NJ/Rutgers you’re put into a situation where the goal of basically every high school student is to leave the state to attend college,
I don’t think that happens anywhere else.
I think it takes incredible stain and a special personality to coach football here... I don’t think he possesses that.
All my opinion and respectfully submitted
He is a good coach, I just don't get BrotherSkinny's obsession that he is the right guy for the Rutgers job NOW.I just don’t get the Leipold thing. He hasn’t beaten anyone in 4 years. Not a single notable win. Beating up on bad MAC teams, losing to every P5 program with a pulse, and splitting with the best teams in the MAC doesn’t move the needle for me.
He’s a good coach and in the perfect spot for him. But, if he really was a gem he wouldn’t still be at Buffalo.
I just don’t get the Leipold thing. He hasn’t beaten anyone in 4 years. Not a single notable win. Beating up on bad MAC teams, losing to every P5 program with a pulse, and splitting with the best teams in the MAC doesn’t move the needle for me.
He’s a good coach and in the perfect spot for him. But, if he really was a gem he wouldn’t still be at Buffalo.
GO back and read your post Wisconsin-Whitewater-Buffalo.The only thing I know is Lance Leipold got it done at Wisconsin- Whitewater...He is getting it done at Buffalo. He seems to be able to get the right talent he needs to beat Teams I would consider a step up from Buffalo. I think he could succeed here Because he is a good coach and kids want to play for good coaches. When he starts winning here, he will keep the NJ kids. This is just my opinion of course but I think he can win here at Rutgers and keep the talented NJ kids here.