Anything to derail the situation with asking about Kiss to take away from Brooks, Joey Downes and Nathan....same story with these media guys. Kids don't play at every program and it's understood why and how that helps Kiss once he decides to move on, why toss that question in...??
Take the over. You know they'll probably be one after the next game.over under was 1.5 new threads.
right now we are at 1
I'll start another thread if we split the pool.over under was 1.5 new threads.
right now we are at 1
Naw...that was Greg.I thought I saw him in the window at Honeyglow as I drove home at about 9:15 pm....or was it Subway??
Jerry Carino is not out for some scummy story, though. He is a good college bball writer and a good guy. He's asking a question that fans are asking. I think that's the media's job.
I don't think it takes away from what Luke, Nick, and Joey did.
It’s a totally fair question. If Kiss has not been a behavioral problem then Pike’s treatment of him is starting to border on cruel. He easily could have played him today and a few other games as well.Fans want to know what is going on. The fans are his clients.
Pike is a real good guy. I highly doubt he is being unfair. I have zero idea what is going on, but I could paint many scenarios where we all would agree that things were being handled correctly.@Unionst Exactly. Pete played as a true Freshman at Quinnepack, sat a year to come here, played last year, and now has one year left after this year. He can't transfer. This is it. The fact that he is not seeing any minutes at all, none, even when the walk-ons are playing, is terrible. When they beat Seton Hall and everyone celebrated on the court, he just walked back to the locker room with his head down and wasn't even in the team photo with the trophy. It's like it's an Amish team and the kid has been shunned. It's not fair to him, and it's not good for the chemistry of the team. So yeah, @NewJerseyHawk it's a valid question
Everyone knows what's going on, I don't understand how following the program and better players doesn't register.Fans want to know what is going on. The fans are his clients.
No he is not he is a Seton Hall shill any positive press he gives Rutgers is begrudgingly doneJerry Carino is not out for some scummy story, though. He is a good college bball writer and a good guy. He's asking a question that fans are asking. I think that's the media's job.
I don't think it takes away from what Luke, Nick, and Joey did.
Your whole premise that he can save a redshirt is incorrect. His only remaining option is to stay at RU one more year or grad transfer.Everyone knows what's going on, I don't understand how following the program and better players doesn't register.
We have 3 to 4 starting lineup football players who made a decision to only play up to the maximum 4 games allowed, so they can preserve a redshirt season. Kiss is not a player that is going to beat out Jacob Young as a defender or Paul Mulcahy, McConnell as a back up PG, defender.
He has the right, as a player to make a decision to either play minimum minutes and burn a season of eligibility OR not play those handful of minutes and potentially save them for a potential next stop.
If RU had a rash of injuries and there were a substantial amount of minutes suddenly available, I am sure Kiss would play. He's not a bad teammate, a bad person or something along those lines.
It's a valid question if there was 100% no chance he would be needed or 100% chance he couldn't play. It is NOT a valid question when the person or reporter already knows the answer and it's spun as if it's somehow a coaching staff decision when it's clearly not 100% on Pike or the staff.
The player is not going to outright tell anyone in the media that I am preserving a potential redshirt or somehow becoming this vilified selfish player, because he doesn't want to waste a season of eligibility.
Suddenly no one could have asked Art Sitkowski, Raheem Blackshear or Jalen Jordan why they entered the transfer portal AFTER the season ended??......everyone knew they made a business decision to preserve their season BEFORE the end of the season or during the season...... yet no one has any interview or confirmation from the player or coach when it happened or why it happened.....why should the program essentially label the players decision to the entire world...?? So we can ruin the player's reputation publically?????....all we got was vague and unanswered questions when everyone with a pulse, already knows what's happening.
This is not "news"....&.when Carino or whomever asked this same question 1000 times by SHU fans about why Taurean Thompson doesn't play now or didn't play in their blowouts, the message was "no comment" after Game 1 or 2 and it was accommodated by Carino to NOT continue to ask why Thompson doesn't play for SHU.....AND they actually have an injury to Mamu, a starting player who plays Thompsons position......
I don't see the media continuing to ask Kevin Willard why their prized transfer from Syracuse, isn't playing, once Mamu was hurt and out for 6 to 8 weeks......I don't think by game 13, when RU has had 5 to 6 opportunities for Kiss to play off the bench, makes sense to keep asking a question.
This is not a dictatorship where coaches have 100% control over how student athletes and their eligibility is or isn't used. You only ask the question, if the reporter truly doesn't have a clue or has no idea about big time college basketball, which isn't the case here.
If fans here can't digest this or choose not to, we can continue to ask this question for the next 2 to 3 months and call it "news that the fans who also have a football program with 85 scholarship athletes, yet also has a fan base with absolutely no clue how a transfer process or portal works"......
i hope you are right but if he is just trying to run Kiss off the team this is a very harsh way to do it.Pike is a real good guy. I highly doubt he is being unfair. I have zero idea what is going on, but I could paint many scenarios where we all would agree that things were being handled correctly.
He has the right, as a player to make a decision to either play minimum minutes and burn a season of eligibility OR not play those handful of minutes and potentially save them for a potential next stop.
If RU had a rash of injuries and there were a substantial amount of minutes suddenly available, I am sure Kiss would play. He's not a bad teammate, a bad person or something along those lines.
It's a valid question if there was 100% no chance he would be needed or 100% chance he couldn't play. It is NOT a valid question when the person or reporter already knows the answer and it's spun as if it's somehow a coaching staff decision when it's clearly not 100% on Pike or the staff.
The player is not going to outright tell anyone in the media that I am preserving a potential redshirt or somehow becoming this vilified selfish player, because he doesn't want to waste a season of eligibility.
Your whole premise that he can save a redshirt is incorrect. His only remaining option is to stay at RU one more year or grad transfer.
It is not a redshirt if you petition for a 6th year via injury waiver, which happens all the time in football. Which can be easily argued without disclosing an injury, if that's the path the player wants to potentially pursue.
The entire premise isn't to try and figure out why Kiss is or isn't playing. The question asked when the player isn't playing is valid to a certain extent.
The premise is exactly to figure out why kiss is or isn't playing. And yes, it is valid to ask the question when a scholarship player isn't seeing the floor even in OOC blowouts.
We saw Bullock not see the floor for a long stretch of games, too, but we all assumed it was due to conditioning and not burning his redshirt as a true freshman. Kiss doesn't have such an easy and pat answer.
After a blowout victory over a team that won't even count come the end of the year, it's perfectly rational to try to speculate why one of our 12 scholarship players is going unused instead of discussing the merits/flaws of that game.
If your asking and have no awareness of college sports, transfers or how things work, YES it's a valid question.
If the roster has depth and similar or better/younger talent and no awareness that playing in minimal minutes, could potentially burn a chance (whether real or imagined) for an opportunity for him to be a grad transfer with 2 years of eligibility, I dont see why asking the question halfway through the season, continue to make sense.
While it is not exactly the same case, Pittsburgh lost forward Cam Johnson as a grad transfer to North Carolina. He had graduated in 3 years as a redshirt during his freshman season. He played 2 years at Pitt and transferred to UNC with TWO years to play at UNC, other than the typical 1 year as a grad transfer.
If Kiss has an unknown injury designation that is real or imagined for this year and has potentially graduated academically already or by the end of May, he "could" potentially see if he can get a 2nd year as a grad transfer vs the typical/standard 1 year.
I don't see the downside of this as a potential thought process by the player.
The linked article shows that you don't have to sit out as a grad transfer and Johnson played two years before getting drafted to the NBA (currently on the Phoenix Suns).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.si...06/17/cameron-johnson-north-carolina-transfer