Supposedly , she has no relationship with the schoolI've always wondered the relationship between her and the school. She seems to never make any mention or publicize her days at RU.
Supposedly , she has no relationship with the school
Supposedly , she has no relationship with the school
+1. I agree with him, as I have many times in the past. Hope to hear from him more.Um exactly what did he do wrong
And you will. Now that he is no longer on the RU payroll, the "best" is yet to come from a very mean spirited TL.+1. I agree with him, as I have many times in the past. Hope to hear from him more.
The majority of the posters here have no idea as to who Tom Luicci is and what his feelings are for Rutgers. Those who know Tom well will tell you how much he loves the school. His question regarding Carli was a,very fair one. In fact Julie had get penciled in as a Hall of Famer last year but she was unable to attend the event and it was thought better to hold her over until this year. I guess whoever was involved in the selection process this year didn't get it done. To me she is a no brainer right now. Why the wait?
Aldo just a side note regarding Luicci's wife.....she was inducted as a Rutgers Loyal Son/Daughter recently and I know how proud Tom was of that selection.[/
And Tom Carville is married to Mary Matalin. So what. Luicci's body of work speaks for itself. Clearly, some of you confuse snarky negativity for objectivity and that is his and your right. Really courageous stance to take when RU was such an easy mark. For a guy who loves RU as much as you profess he does, his words speak a lot louder than his actions. Next time you see the loving couple, tell his wife how much we appreciate her service to RU.
I've always wondered the relationship between her and the school. She seems to never make any mention or publicize her days at RU.
Tom is a private citizen who is an alum like all of us...doesnt work for Rutgers or the media..why cant he have an opinion like the rest of us bozos
Luicci was more than just a reporter, he was the Targum Sports Editor, the only 2 time editor . I don't get some alums, first you try to kill Luicci's RU rep, now Carli Lloyd. Who's next, Brian Leonard? Khas Greene?
Was it Bob Mulcahy who said "only in NJ, where they eat their own" ?
Yikes, some loyal sons.
If that were the case ( your penultimate paragraph) and Luicci really loved RU and/ or had any journalistic integrity, he would have resigned his position at the SL. Obviously, neither is the case.Was this directed toward me? You replied to my post.
"Kill Luicci's RU rep"? By not knowing he was 2 time Targum editor? I postulated that Rutgers rising popularity in the late 70s may have helped Luicci get into professional sportswriting at the S-L.
How is that killing Luicci's RU rep? This whole thread exists because TL is very publicly divesting himself of everything Rutgers.. "its time". He is killing his RU rep more than anyone here.
If you mean how Luicci has treated Rutgers in his reporting.. I have a lifetime of reading his stuff and while he is head and shoulders above Politi, many here know he had been rough on Rutgers many times.
I'll go further... I think he was made to defend his lama mater in that S-L office and was ribbed mercilessly when Rutgers stumbled.. which was often. I think he tried to prove his objectivity by being overly harsh at times and presenting Rutgers in a bad light even when he did not have to... and maybe he was just a little human and showed his disappointment with Rutgers through his stories. Maybe someone who was not a 2 time Targum sports editor could have been more detached.
An infamous example of this kind of treatment of Rutgers followed a 1-11 season in 2002. In the special preview section the following August, Luicci authored a piece going over every single game of that 2002 season in excruciating detail. Why? And one time on signing day he authored a poison pen piece, iirc... many people got pissed at the S-L that day.
Now that might have been an assignment of the S-L editors.. maybe they assigned it, maybe they just re-edited stuff he had authored at the time of those games. And if you credit the S-L editors with the awful choices of story titles, lead paragraphs, photograph choices and captions.. then TL might have been in a no-win situation and not have been responsible for some of the worst Rutgers coverage that was associated with his name.
As for Carli Lloyd.. I certainly said nothing negative about her and agree with you criticizing those that had made those inane comments above.
Nah. This is Jersey. You tolerate crap like that from the day you are born here. You want live a life of high-minded principles? Move. It would be too hard here.If that were the case ( your penultimate paragraph) and Luicci really loved RU and/ or had any journalistic integrity, he would have resigned his position at the SL. Obviously, neither is the case.
He was never either.If his tweets bug you, then Id stop following him.
He has no requirement to be all pro-RU anymore, or Anti-PSU anymore..
He was never either.
I don't know what the situation is now, but Lloyd definitely did back in 2013 (see link). It was an interesting dynamic meeting the two of them. Lalas is as gregarious as they come. He can talk your ear off. Lloyd is just the opposite... farouche, but respectful to all the fans eager to get her autograph and/or have a photo taken with her.Supposedly , she has no relationship with the school
The majority of the posters here have no idea as to who Tom Luicci is and what his feelings are for Rutgers. Those who know Tom well will tell you how much he loves the school. His question regarding Carli was a,very fair one.
Back to the OP. Not sure how people are reading that specific tweet as a negative.
My thinking on this is that they will wait for Carli's Professional Career to end before induction. Brian Leonard recently retired which makes sense as to his induction.
What does there always have to be a controversy and a hatred toward people. Specifically people who are loyal sons like Tom Luicci is and will continue to be.
She didn't have many public gaffes because she wouldn't talk to anybody and hid from the press and the public. He didn't do her any favors if that was the strategy and he was the architect. It certainly didn't do anything to endear her to the fanbase or the media. I tried to give her the benefit of the doubt but sticking her in the attic and hiding her away like some crazy aunt did her more damage at least in my eyes.The tweet, just read on its own, is probably not worthy of a multi-page thread. Many of us have been reading his material for decades though. After reading hundreds of his pieces, we've all formed opinions on his writing persona.
I know @rutgersal well in real life. He's a great guy and a hardcore (but normal) fan like the rest of us. He clearly has a distinct online persona that many of you have been reading for years.
Does it matter what some stranger feels in real life among a small circle of friends, if what he projects to the masses is something completely different? If Al didn't like RU, would it matter? If TL loves the school in private, does it matter?
In private, LBJ was a racist who said n****** regularly. Yet publicly he did more for civil rights than arguably anyone else in the last 150 years. The private stuff is meaningless.
I do think TL did a great job once we hired him though. As far as I can remember, Julie's gaffes and the leaks in the department stopped immediately.
Has anyone seen her even mention Rutgers on any form of social media. I have not. She really does not care about our school.
And in what context should she mention Rutgers? So "does not care" because she doesn't come up with some lame context to mention Rutgers? Message boards really are the work of the devil ... :smiley: