If you couldnt beat us during the Greg Robinson era then something was wrong with your program. Im more interested to see how Rutgers did against SU when they had a adequate coach. Marrone was 2-2 vs some of your best teams. Would have been 3-1 if Bailey didnt fumble on his way for the winning TD in overtime. Marrone had less talent and 15 less scholarship players because he cleaned house when he got there. You guys get mad because SU fans dont pat your backs enough. The big brother doesnt give the little brother enough love.
Brothers?
You guys are the evil stepsister.. the red-headed younger "brother" product of the milkman.
Syracuse is the main reason why Big East football imploded. You just wouldn't get the basketball schools in line to give football its due. That's why Miami left and took BC and VTech with it. And even later.. when the Big East football schools should have talked about leaving en masse, Syracuse would have none of it.. thus dooming the Big East. Every Big East football playing school had a hand in that.. including Rutgers.. but Syracuse, because of its importance in basketball, could have forced the Catholic BBALL schools hands a bit.
Hell.. in founding the Big East, Syracuse prevented the eastern all-sports conference from happening. You share that honor with the stubborn jackass JoePA who had his hands full ignoring Sandusky's crimes.
And as for your record with Marone.. we had a lot of turnover of assistants because of our success.. and when Marone beat us we had a dismal OC.. who later became a dismal head coach. So if you can blame a coach, so can we. Marone deserves a lot of credit for that first SURPRISE win.. he saw what a few of us fans saw regarding our offensive system and destroyed us with a gimmick D. We had like 3 NFL linemen on that OL and we gave up countless sacks to Marone's D. It wasn't talent.. it was the scheme. The sucky sucky scheme and playcalling. Marone provided the blueprint for the following year when MANY TEAMS used his same gimmick D to crush our offense.
Go back and watch that game.. just blitz a LB and aim 5 yards behind center.... rinse, repeat. Whether we pass or handoff.. that was where it was goign to happen.. and the QB would have his back to the rushers so he wouldn't be able to do anythign about it.. so go ahead, blitz your heads off!
And oddly, we actually beat Syracuse that next year because we did not run our usual offense. That was strange. You'd think we could have changed out of that offensive scheme for other games as well. So many other teams used Marone's D scheme to crush us.. but Marone couldn't. You cannot make this stuff up. Why we ever gave Flood the HC I will never understand. He lost his co-OC gig after that next season.
Total coaching failure.. just like your Robinson years.
But if anyone knows what lack of talent and depth looks like, it is Rutgers fans.. we grew up on it. And Rutgers has had superior teams to Syracuse for over a decade now. And in the Big Ten, there is no way that is ever going to change. Syracuse will have to come up with something special to reverse the trend.. my suggestion is to load up on 5th year players and every 4-5 years field an experienced team that executes like a team of 4th and 5th years players should execute.
If it is any consolation, I think Rutgers should do the same in order to actually win the Big Ten East sometime in the next 20 years. That would give us 4-5 shots at fielding a very senior team whose experience might make the difference vs younger 4-star laden teams from Ohio State and Michigan.. hopefully they lose guys to the NFL allowing such opportunities.
Bottom line: I wouldn't change places with Syracuse for anything. That basketball record is mighty attractive.. but we're talking football here. No sale.