To the portal. Senior 5th year big. Would fill our hole in a big way with size strength and experience. 15/7 this past year a legit 7 footer and good screener
Vlad Goldin FAU
- Thread starter MCKnight2004
- Start date
I don’t know. Against Northwestern in their Big Dance loss he only shot 83% from the floor and 82% from the line while putting up 19 and added only 9 boards.
Perfect fit, but probably following May to Michigan--at least that would be my totally uninformed guess.
Agree, Michigan makes sense following May. And they’ll be in a complete NIL rebuild after such a bad season
The center position is most critical. RU can’t afford to be cheap in NIL, or take a chance on a Sophomore with talent
The center position is most critical. RU can’t afford to be cheap in NIL, or take a chance on a Sophomore with talent
My worry is that we’re broke. Ace and Dylan $$. This needs to be an all-in season and it might be telling that we got a cheap MAC recruit.
Dude got buckets. Only three guards in the MAC got 20 a game…and one of them is 5’11” which wouldn’t work well most games in the BIG (see Fernandes). So basically there were only two 6’4” high-volume very high-scoring guards in the MAC.
Last edited:
You get what you put into NIL. May don't donate and center is the highest paying position in the portal. That sophomore with talent is still going to command a large chunk of RU's NIL budget.
You should donate more so we can get better players. Go cut a check to knights of the raritan @Shelby65
I like your sense of humor.Centers that could make foul shots at a high rate rarely have been seen at Rutgers.
but is that $ better spent upping what we can pay a decent 5 ?
Agree. Pedestrian numbers. Wemby went for 40 and 20 against the Knicks the other night. I'm looking for something in that range on a consistent basis. Will settle for 30 and 15 most nights.
On a team that couldn't shoot, you're complaining about paying market for a shooter.
don't get me started....he may turn out to be a better shooter than Simpson, but his % stats don't suggest it. He just shot it a lot more, hence the higher PPG. He also takes a lot of midrange, just like Simpson. I think he's better, but not by a lot.
but yes, we have no 5 at the moment and that's a more critical position on both ends. I'd much rather spend overmarket on a talented big and take a chance on a sleeper (discount) 3rd guard.
How can you say his stats don’t suggest he’s a better shooter than Simpson? One is a 43.9% career shooter. The other is a 33.7% career shooter and was the worst on all of D1 last season. These numbers are materially different.
Similar threads
