I think the "stink" label varies by your perspective.
I understand why RU fans would say we didnt "stink" last year and in 2014.
but to MOST college football fans (particularly those of winning programs) if their teams did what we did last year and 2014 they would say their teams "stunk" and similarly would think that RU "stunk" in 2014 and last year.
get above .500 in conference AND be a team that has a LEGIT chance to beat one of the top teams (not just make it a bit interesting into the second half) - and then fans of other teams wont think you "stink"
with that said, I agree with the OP - for the first time- there is a chance that this will be the first year we wont "stink" in the BIG (as viewed by the VAST MAJORITY of (non-RU) college football fans, talking head, analysts, etc. etc.)
I understand why RU fans would say we didnt "stink" last year and in 2014.
but to MOST college football fans (particularly those of winning programs) if their teams did what we did last year and 2014 they would say their teams "stunk" and similarly would think that RU "stunk" in 2014 and last year.
get above .500 in conference AND be a team that has a LEGIT chance to beat one of the top teams (not just make it a bit interesting into the second half) - and then fans of other teams wont think you "stink"
with that said, I agree with the OP - for the first time- there is a chance that this will be the first year we wont "stink" in the BIG (as viewed by the VAST MAJORITY of (non-RU) college football fans, talking head, analysts, etc. etc.)