Explain how it’s toxic to say I’m not giving up on the team until we’re mathematically eliminated from the B1G tournament.I was referring to the OP and bac2therac's assessment.
Your view wreaks of toxic pessimism.
Explain how it’s toxic to say I’m not giving up on the team until we’re mathematically eliminated from the B1G tournament.I was referring to the OP and bac2therac's assessment.
See, we can be .500 in Q 1/2/3.Merrimack is inching closer to becoming a Quad 3 win
It's highly unrealistic. Look up the definition.OP doesn't give a specific percentage but I don't see anything in his post suggesting the probability is high. Just nonzero.
But let's concede that his post is, in fact, optimism. Why is it toxic?
No you are missing the odds that we win the big ten tournament. That alone can account for say 3-4% of the odds. You’re also using the midpoint of those ranges. I would think if you want to use the low end of wins, you lose the low end of the 5-10%ChatGPT:
- If we get 18-20 wins we have a ~25% of making the tournament.
- We have a ~7.5% chance of making the tournament.
- Therefore, we have a ~ 7.5%/25% = 30% chance of winning 18-20 games.
Conclusion:
ChatGPT is bullshit.
Why do you keep telling me about right now lol? Is there someone, somewhere on Earth, arguing that we currently are on the bubble?
Well, no, the idea that we have a non-zero chance at a bid is quite realistic.It's highly unrealistic.
I googled "toxic optimism" and everything I get is about "toxic positivity". According to Wikipedia,Look up the definition.
we had this discussion last week and it was brutal...now a week later with 2 more losses its just stupid
We had a healthy Dylan who carved up Alabama for 37 points and went downhill and could not be stopped. We got a more consistent Ace against Alabama and Texas A& M . Jeremiah scored 20 against Texas A&am and was our third scorer when Dylan only had 18.As they use to say- the $64,000 question is what happened to the team that almost took down both Alabama and Houston in LV- currently 2 of the top 6 teams in the country???
I think I’d just tell them you tried, unfortunately you came to RU and we never seem to capitalize properly on opportunities so the team sucks. I do appreciate the effort.Takes the same amount of thought and energy to be an optimist or a pessimist.
I love Rutgers, I love college basketball, I love our players. They’re like my sons. When my sons were struggling in some way, I did not give up on them, and I never will. Same with our team.
If you were invited into the locker room before the next game, would you tell the team, “Oh brother, you guys suck, just give up already.” Or would you find something they can latch onto, to give them hope and ignite a spark in them?
I choose the latter.
Dig the Trek reference!“We’re not done yet” said Captain Kirk in Star Trek III as he blew up the enterprise and got everyone safely to Genesis.
I trust him a helluva a lot more than I trust “Captain Pike.”
If we have trekkers on the board I hope they liked the joke even if they disagree with me. 😁
Hopefully Dylan doesn’t even travel, if he does he shouldn’t play a second.Until we’re mathematically eliminated from the B1G tourney we still have a chance to win our way into the big dance.
Also, I believe finishing 8-3 in the regular season will put us on the bubble. That would require winning our remaining 5 home games plus 3 road games. It can be done.
Has to start with a W at Northwestern.
And we need Dylan at 80% or better, 25 or more productive minutes per game the rest of the way.
Let’s do it.
I agree with this, been saying since we were 8-8 we need to go 10-5 the rest of the way....A BIG issue was playing D Harp on Saturday. SHOULD NOT have and continued PT so he can play tonight! I watched him limp through a shoot around. NO WAY should he have played...May have screwed whatever chance we had as I'd be surprised if he played tonight or was really able to help ...BTW, if he's 80% I would SIT HIM tonight as well!!!! We can NOT have any other regressions with him!Until we’re mathematically eliminated from the B1G tourney we still have a chance to win our way into the big dance.
Also, I believe finishing 8-3 in the regular season will put us on the bubble. That would require winning our remaining 5 home games plus 3 road games. It can be done.
Has to start with a W at Northwestern.
And we need Dylan at 80% or better, 25 or more productive minutes per game the rest of the way.
Let’s do it.
What is RUs BIG record in games D Harp was not injured or played with FLU (5 total games and all losses)...Answer: 3-1 That's the receipt...BIG issue now is D Harps foot as he SHOULD NOT have played vs M St Saturday...did 3 conferences land that many teams in the top 100 net last year...have to factor in conference consolidation and different landscape this year. There are at least 6 schools possibly more than have played 10 or more Q1 games currrently. 5-11 in Q1 isnt really a flex
i think there is a less than 3% chance they win the games I just put out there.
and yes these threads are just as bad as the other threads...its totally delusional thinking with no basis of reality..there are no receipts the OP has to say Rutgers is capable of this...the same stuff was posted last year I believe by the OP
Only path is winning Big Ten Tournament.the type of wins matter....18 in itself does nothing we have gone over this before
RU has no marquee wins right now. They have no non conference games. With all SEC/Big 10 schools in the top 100 and almost all the Big 12, alot of schools will have Q1 wins that are not deserving of a bid. Michigan State would have been a marquee win. Illinois and at Purdue and maybe at Oregon are only truly the only feather in the cap opportunities left. Beating Michigan at home is great because of their solid NET but its not going to be considered that big big win. Beating Iowa, Minnesota, and USC at home and Washington on the road do little to help the resume while losses would torpedo any chance.
So there are your 8 wins right there...your 3 losses would be at Northwestern, at Michigan, at Maryland.
so next 11.....Quad 1 4-3, Quad 2-0, Quad 3 2-0
overall 18-13
Quad 1: 5-11
Quad 2: 5-0
Quad 3: 2-2
Quad 4: 6-0
Quad 1/2/3: 12-13.....HUGE NEGATIVE TO BE BELOW 500 HERE TO ADD ON TO THE NEGATIVE OF NO OUT OF CONFERENCE WIN AND A HORRIFIC LOSS TO KENNESAW STATE
you realize that RU would have to beat Illinois, Michigan, at Purdue and at Oregon for the 18-13 scenario to EVEN BE CONSIDERED AND NOT SCREW UP IN ANY OF THE LESSER GAMES
Why is the OP doing this to himself.
Is Charles Barkley Jr on campus in New Brunswick?🤣NC State last year.
You never know!
We’re 1.5 games out of 10th in the Big 18. Top 9 get a bye in the BTT. The fact that some are calling people insane for suggesting that Bubble is even remotely possible, is idiotic. Of course the season is still in front of us
Bac and guys like him relish in the negstives-- they never realized that it's harder to find positives and easier to attack. If you had a position of authority ,those that want to look good think that constantly finding negatives will boost their position -- in actuality being able to find positives in a person and helping that person to use and extend those positives makes you a more successful leader.You keep saying this but we also don't have 18 wins now and absolutely no one disputes that we are miles and miles away from the bubble if the field is being selected today.
I mean quoting a Q1/2/3 winning percentage when 16 of the 25 are Q1 is kinda misleading. How many of your comps played 16 Q1 games? Looking back at pre conference tourney time from last year these are the teams that played 16+ Q1 games:
Houston 16
Marquette 15
Baylor 17
Those are the only ones I see, to be fair I am scrolling through by hand.
Yep this is why 3-4% is a small number.
Because it's more fun than endlessly debating why Pike sucks or why we don't have enough NIL (and also both things can be done at once). Do you ask the same questions about people who stay to the end of games when we have little to no chance to win?
Your second sentence is very true.Bac and guys like him relish in the negstives-- they never realized that it's harder to find positives and easier to attack. If you had a position of authority ,those that want to look good think that constantly finding negatives will boost their position -- in actuality being able to find positives in a person and helping that person to use and extend those positives makes you a more successful leader.