This post is with the assumption that Flood did not act in a manner that would be par for the course at UNC.
If all Flood did was violate the rule regarding contact between Prof and Coach, and review of the email shows no ill-intentioned requests, why not immediately come out with "Flood suspended 1 game for improper correspondence with professor"???
I don't understand any reason for a long review process. Review the email as it pertains to the code and be done with it. Come out with news of the suspension and then everyone can move on.
The only reason for a long review would be to check into previous emails. But Flood did not bring that to light until after the news leaked.
If all Flood did was violate the rule regarding contact between Prof and Coach, and review of the email shows no ill-intentioned requests, why not immediately come out with "Flood suspended 1 game for improper correspondence with professor"???
I don't understand any reason for a long review process. Review the email as it pertains to the code and be done with it. Come out with news of the suspension and then everyone can move on.
The only reason for a long review would be to check into previous emails. But Flood did not bring that to light until after the news leaked.