ADVERTISEMENT

.4 Seconds left. Throw the ball off the Purdue player?

gigantor1024

All American
Apr 6, 2006
6,089
3,177
113
Wouldn’t this have been a safe way to get that second off the clock? We see it under the baseline from time to time. Is there any rule from intentionally throwing the ball off the player right in front of the inbounds passer?
 
I wouldn’t recommend that. Chance that ball could bounce off the Purdue defender and hit the inbounder while standing on the sideline. Would result in Purdue possession, similar to the travel
 
I wouldn’t recommend that. Chance that ball could bounce off the Purdue defender and hit the inbounder while standing on the sideline. Would result in Purdue possession, similar to the travel
But there is only .4 seconds left so it doesn't matter. It would waste a couple tenths minimum. I said the same thing. Edey is an impossible target to miss too
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking
But there is only .4 seconds left so it doesn't matter. It would waste a couple tenths minimum. I said the same thing. Edey is an impossible target to miss too
The worst thing that can happen there is to travel or throw the ball untouched out of bounds. Throwing it with the intention of Edey tipping it would be the best idea. He could never collect and shoot that quickly.

0.4 is essentially a tip or nothing chance.
 
You're also at the mercy of the official on the clock. Could get thrown off guard and be a few tenths of a second late which would allow Edey to throw up a prayer. Odds are very low he hits it but I think throwing the Hail Mary is the most efficient way to run the clock out.
 
Wouldn’t this have been a safe way to get that second off the clock? We see it under the baseline from time to time. Is there any rule from intentionally throwing the ball off the player right in front of the inbounds passer?
100% there is no way 0.4 seconds does not run off the clock if he does that by the time the ball hits him and goes out of bounds
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and Rokodesh
I thought the same thing.

This is now the third game where Caleb has had minor snafus at the end of close games (missed FT vs OSU and SHU). Hopefully these mistakes will be fresh and force new focus as the season wears on
 
  • Like
Reactions: winfield102
I know theres a rule, like you can't throw it off his head or something on purpose, but I was screaming to just hit him in the gut. No way in .4 he reacts, gets the ball and shoots it to win it. Worst case scenario it bounced and hit caleb but time would have ran out
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newbrunfus
Purdue had no timeouts left. As others have said, Caleb could have just tossed the ball to Edey.
 
Wouldn’t this have been a safe way to get that second off the clock? We see it under the baseline from time to time. Is there any rule from intentionally throwing the ball off the player right in front of the inbounds passer?
Just throw it high in the air towards the Purdue basket. As soon as a player touches it the game is over
 
  • Like
Reactions: LOU-RU85
Throw the ball right to the defender. He will be so surprised after catching it that he won't come close to getting a shot off. 😂 😂 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh
As far as I can think, the optimal play is:

Line up four guys under their basket to make sure the ball doesn’t go out of bounds without getting touched. Throw the ball towards their basket. If they go to get it you don’t need to even stop them, they won’t be able throw a full court heave that fast.
 
Tossing the ball right to Edey would have made a great/funny highlight too. Throw it up high so he's got to jump a little to get it.
 
Just throw it high in the air towards the Purdue basket. As soon as a player touches it the game is over
But if you set a pick you must not move or the refs can call an O foul before the ball is inbounded and give Purdue the ball where Caleb was inbounding.
 
How about just rolling it across the floor away from everyone?
Clock doesn't start until the ball is touched. If you roll it across the court and it goes out without being touched they inbound from there. No time off the clock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking and pmvon
What about this move?
DirectVigilantAmoeba-max-1mb.gif
 
Wouldn’t this have been a safe way to get that second off the clock? We see it under the baseline from time to time. Is there any rule from intentionally throwing the ball off the player right in front of the inbounds passer?
Play worked fine as played. Gave us chance to tip inbounds pass. Got Reiber an important play...
 
Wouldn’t this have been a safe way to get that second off the clock? We see it under the baseline from time to time. Is there any rule from intentionally throwing the ball off the player right in front of the inbounds passer?
Throw a sky high pop up towards Rutgers basket and make sure all our players just stand still hands at their sides ...no movement. Even if Purdue catches it cleanly there won't be enough time to shoot .

Glad we won!

Mo
 
He could have just handed the ball to Edey.
How awesome would that have been for ESPN and other sports programs broadcasting for the world to see?. Would serve all the cocky, yippy Boilermakers right.
I know theres a rule, like you can't throw it off his head or something on purpose, but I was screaming to just hit him in the gut. No way in .4 he reacts, gets the ball and shoots it to win it. Worst case scenario it bounced and hit caleb but time would have ran out
Lol! No way!!! Refs would probably call a double technical against Rutgers and put Edey on the line to win the game...just to give Purdue a chance.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tm_nj and carmenst
We can debate all the many ways to run this play but I feel confident in saying that there is no wrong answer here that would cost you the game except for walking up the sideline before inbounding the ball.
Pike will need to address this in future practices. The play can be titled "What do do when inbounding with 0.4 seconds left and up by a point on the #1 team in the nation (and some variations/see last year). Since this last second, beating a #1 team has become a tradition, it might be worth working on for the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT