ADVERTISEMENT

ACC Blows

R

RJM_Go_RU

Junior
Dec 21, 2016
544
367
63
Oh for 4 yesterday.

Virginia scores least points in tournament in twenty-plus years and gets blown out by Florida.

3 seed FSU gets blown out by plus twenty points to 11 seed Xavier

Notre Dame (are they ACC? ) loses big to WVU.

And Syracuse (ha,ha) loses in NIT
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow
RJM_Go_RU said:
Oh for 4 yesterday.

Virginia scores least points in tournament in twenty-plus years and gets blown out by Florida.

3 seed FSU gets blown by plus twenty points by by 11 seed Butler.

Notre Dame (are they ACC? ) loses Big to WVU.

And Syracuse (ha,ha) loses in NIT
Click to expand...
Arkansas might give UNC-CHeat some problems. Anderson has had success upsetting 1 seeds from this position and CHeat is likely going to be missing one of its primary ball handlers.
 
Tony Bennett may be male version of Vivian Stringer, no O.
 
shields said:
Tony Bennett may be male version of Vivian Stringer, no O.
Click to expand...
Virginia is a classic case of a one dimensional defensive team that excels during the regular season but in one and done tournament play, opponents with shooters expose their offensive woes.
 
RJM_Go_RU said:
Oh for 4 yesterday.

Virginia scores least points in tournament in twenty-plus years and gets blown out by Florida.

3 seed FSU gets blown by plus twenty points to 11 seed Butler.

Notre Dame (are they ACC? ) loses big to WVU.

And Syracuse (ha,ha) loses in NIT
Click to expand...

11 seed was Xavier

Saw it coming...ACC over seeded and B1G under-seeded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow
ACC always gets credit for losing to their own in regular season. Always has. Talk about a win-win.
 
RUJMM78 said:
Virginia is a classic case of a one dimensional defensive team that excels during the regular season but in one and done tournament play, opponents with shooters expose their offensive woes.
Click to expand...
Florida's best shooters did not shoot well. They got points from everyone though.

Florida is very good defensively. They were tired of hearing how good Virginia was on D & wanted to prove something last night...at least that's what a few of them told me.
 
If Rutgers made it to NCAA's and then scored less than 40....just imagine the press coverage...and the jokes
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AreYouNUTS
ACC doesn't blow, but it has always been top heavy. Traditionally, it was only Duke and UNC at the top and then everyone else. Now Louisville arguably has joined them. But performance in the Tournament this year shows that their coat tails were way too long. ESPN hyped the entire conference and the Committee bought in. No doubt that the the Big10 lacks a clear No. 1 seed type team this year, but its depth appears to be just as good as the ACC, yet Iowa was left home with a record that would have been rewarded with a bid in the ACC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow and scottsdaleal
RU-ROCS said:
ACC doesn't blow, but it has always been top heavy. Traditionally, it was only Duke and UNC at the top and then everyone else. Now Louisville arguably has joined them. But performance in the Tournament this year shows that their coat tails were way too long. ESPN hyped the entire conference and the Committee bought in. No doubt that the the Big10 lacks a clear No. 1 seed type team this year, but its depth appears to be just as good as the ACC, yet Iowa was left home with a record that would have been rewarded with a bid in the ACC.
Click to expand...
Ok.. "ACC Blows" is a hyperbole but makes a good headline...plus I always enjoy making fun of them..half-of them "old" Big East...So maybe more Big East than Big East..and ESPN lapdog
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-ROCS
Here is my question - How does one resolve the awful performance in this year's tournaments (NCAA and NIT) with last year's domination (6 of Final 16; 4 of Final 8, 2 of Final 4)? Sort of similar to SEC Bowl performances the 2014-15 and 2015-16 seasons.
 
RJM_Go_RU said:
Oh for 4 yesterday.

Virginia scores least points in tournament in twenty-plus years and gets blown out by Florida.

3 seed FSU gets blown out by plus twenty points to 11 seed Xavier

Notre Dame (are they ACC? ) loses big to WVU.

And Syracuse (ha,ha) loses in NIT
Click to expand...
And now that Louisville is out by virtue of that lowly B1G team Michigan beating them, it looks like once again the ACC was overrated. And yes I know Duke and UNC can still win it all, but I think the ACC was rewarded too much and their other teams received to high of seeds in the brackets. Meanwhile, the B1G as of now (Michigan St. has yet to play) are sending three teams to the Sweet Sixteen. Nice.
 
RU MAN said:
And now that Louisville is out by virtue of that lowly B1G team Michigan beating them, it looks like once again the ACC was overrated. And yes I know Duke and UNC can still win it all, but I think the ACC was rewarded too much and their other teams received to high of seeds in the brackets. Meanwhile, the B1G as of now (Michigan St. has yet to play) are sending three teams to the Sweet Sixteen. Nice.
Click to expand...

"Once again" - What about last NCAA Tournament?
 
bac2therac said:
9 schools.....7 of them seeded 5 or better and only ONE make the Sweet 16...I would call this an epic failure to only get 1 of 9 schools in the Sweet 16

SEC, Pac 12, Big 10, Big 12 get 3 each, Big East 2, WCC 1, and the ACC with just 1
Click to expand...

This is an epic failure....they got "easier" matchups they didn't take advantage of...and they got s major oversees advantage
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal_2RU and bac2therac
Had only UNC lost......damn.....what an epic disaster for the ACC..I'll sleep well tonight...:)......Will Swofford?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow
I suppose ESPN will start previewing the baseball season a little earlier now that all the teams they hype (except UNC) are gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
I think the issue with the rpi for all these conferences is that it is so weighed toward OOC games and the first two months so that automatically ranks the conferences by Jan 1 and that does not change during conference play. I think some conferences like the ACC and even the Big East seem better equipped to start the year knocking off other teams...we see it every year. Big 10 usually on the slow side to get its legs so they tend to be rated behind the others. Sure it differs some year to year but ACC is able to use this rpi stuff to have this super SOS for its league members, it is used so much that schools that were under 500 in league and near .500 overall like Pitt, Clemson and Ga Tech were considered bubble teams in the last week or two of regular season....so its saying our conference is so strong that you can overlook going 6-12 in league play

Like to see other metrics brought into play. There was no excuses that Wisconsin was a 8 seed when they finished 2nd in the Big 10...thats a worse seed that schools like Dayton and Seton Hall and how would Maryland be a 6 over them. Too much reliance on SOS and not common sense
 
RU-ROCS said:
ACC doesn't blow, but it has always been top heavy. Traditionally, it was only Duke and UNC at the top and then everyone else. Now Louisville arguably has joined them. But performance in the Tournament this year shows that their coat tails were way too long. ESPN hyped the entire conference and the Committee bought in. No doubt that the the Big10 lacks a clear No. 1 seed type team this year, but its depth appears to be just as good as the ACC, yet Iowa was left home with a record that would have been rewarded with a bid in the ACC.
Click to expand...

I should have said the ACC is a one-team league!:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
 
  • Like
Reactions: koleszar
Sideline20 said:
I suppose ESPN will start previewing the baseball season a little earlier now that all the teams they hype (except UNC) are gone.
Click to expand...
Dukie V will come out with his top 5 for next year and you can lay money on it Puke & NC will be in his top 5 as always.
 
bac2therac said:
I think the issue with the rpi for all these conferences is that it is so weighed toward OOC games and the first two months so that automatically ranks the conferences by Jan 1 and that does not change during conference play.
Click to expand...

Should the RPI not look at out of conference play in assessing conferences? It should look at in-conference play when assessing conferences?
 
Went from last to first, since end of 1st round, thanks to the ACC!

...and 2 of 10 have lost their champ while the guy behind me has me runner-up.
 
This morning..Mike and Mike...Golic asks Vitake - "was ACC over-rated?".. he hems and haws..you need to look at the totality of the season, he says.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L

Lunardi Pre-Season Bracketology

Replies
7
Views
1K
Men's Basketball
GreaseTruckCaptain
G
R

Does anyone know how they pick the voters for the College Football Coaches Poll? A fair one that represents a proper balance of conferences/schools?

Replies
11
Views
547
Rutgers Football
GoodOl'Rutgers
GoodOl'Rutgers
rutgersguy1

OT: 2024 Week9 College Football Games Thread 10/24-10/26 (Old Thread)

Replies
212
Views
6K
Rutgers Football
DocJayy
D
seels2662

Week 2 of our crazy darkhorse season

Replies
13
Views
901
The Round Table
Scarlet Shack
S
rutgersguy1

OT: NCAA College Football Games Thread 9/26-9/28 Thur-Sat

Replies
317
Views
7K
Rutgers Football
rutgersguy1
rutgersguy1
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back