Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's the Rutgers way.
not the point,In order to compete with the rest of the B10,you need Coaches and facilities.Both of these building blocks cost money to get to a B10 level. Adding an ex head Coach,or an experienced power Five Cord asst, to help Ash,or the offense side might be a good idea....I agree with the OP, the only way to fix this is to give everyone a huge raise.
What gives? Am I making it up? It's true factual info....and just like clockwork...
What gives? Am I making it up? It's true factual info.
We were 2-1 in football before we started playing the conference schedule.Is there any correlation that we broke the bank for assistant coaches for what is now our 8-1 basketball team?
What gives? Am I making it up? It's true factual info.
Not True on Bball asst coaches.pretty sure our BBall assistants aren't the cheapest. but why let that get in the way of a good story
you know the challenge we have until we get full share of the B1G...yet you continue to throw your sh!t out there.
whatever - I don't know why I waste my time with you.
Well where's the damn participation ribbon?!?Rutgers Athletics is always behind the curve. We do not compete. We participate.
its a USA today article on rising Asst Coach salaries in College football..Does anyone else see the irony in the fact that a NJ paper writes this article as an indictment against the school for being cheap BUT if we ever ended up somewhere in the middle of the conference or higher, there would be an expose' done in a heartbeat about how the school's priorities are misaligned.
Does anyone else see the irony in the fact that a NJ paper writes this article as an indictment against the school for being cheap BUT if we ever ended up somewhere in the middle of the conference or higher, there would be an expose' done in a heartbeat about how the school's priorities are misaligned.
Yes but it was commented on by the Asbury Park Press, no?its a USA today article on rising Asst Coach salaries in College football..
Exactly. Obviously the asst coaches were holding back on teaching skills like tackling and passing as well as chalk talk until they get an increase.Just so easy to fix. Give everybody a raise and they instantly gain a decade of experience.
Essentially a strike pay increase, right?Exactly. Obviously the asst coaches were holding back on teaching skills like tackling and passing as well as chalk talk until they get an increase.
Exactly, they were on a work slowdown last season. We were not lacking talent, it was just the coaches were holding back. Show them the money and we probably win the East next season.Essentially a strike pay increase, right?
Well where's the damn participation ribbon?!?
We're like the anti-Conor McGregor.Rutgers Athletics is always behind the curve. We do not compete. We participate.
Subsidy + B1G paying us $11.6 million = No money for coaches.inexperienced = low pay
I have been saying this for awhile in different threads when this comes up, Everyone was so eager to throw rose petals at Barchi's feet when he fired Flood and Julie. There was a shout from above that money was not an issue. Well...thats not really true. RU still spends less than everybody else..and yes I know the money isnt there. But money was an issue, it prevented any kind of push for an experienced coach and it without argument definitely was a factor in the assistant pool which we find to be the lowest paid in the league. Bottom line is you get what you pay for. RU was paying MAC level salary to Flood so it was already behind the curve and just by paying Ash double what Flood was getting didnt mean that somehow RU had arrived and Barchi was opening the purse strings. I am still very very weary of Barchi and his uncanny ability to hold back the athletic department, the refusal to borrow any money against future earnings speaks for itself. He is always riding with a bus along side of him ready to do his bidding. So to me RU doing things halfway yet again, how can RU expect to go to bowl games when they are spending less than anyone else
RU was paying Greg about 2.5 million in his last year (or we would have been), nabbed Flood for a cool $700K per year, and paid the assistants, particularly the OC and DC, peanuts. If anything, under those circumstances, there should have been MORE money for assistants, particularly the OC and DC. Hell, if anyone needed a strong and experienced OC and DC, it was Flood. When they finally opened up the purse and got Friedgen, a lot positive things happened on the field (not all positive, but better than previous years). So, looking at it now, RU could have and should have spent more for the OC and DC and assistants, but that's not what we do here. . . . .
no you are right, we are playing the same foolish game but in a different league..,.and yes we arent getting full share, but does then that mean we are destined for last place and 3-9 seasons for 5 years, if so they need to tell us that because why buy tickets to see a product that is expected to be bad and that they are not supporting. The key here is the refusal to borrow any money from future earnings and you bring up a great point about where did the Schiano money go.