Wachtel has us in Dayton. We're out with a loss.Ignore the troll. Do y’all remember if Wachtel had us in? I thinkk he nailed us as last 4 in right?
Wachtel has us in Dayton. We're out with a loss.Ignore the troll. Do y’all remember if Wachtel had us in? I thinkk he nailed us as last 4 in right?
Wachtel has us in Dayton. We're out with a loss.
Are you on the committee
No.....huh?
Just reporting what Wachtel has us..........weird post.
Did he specifically say we are out with a loss...there are moving parts
What did he say exactly
He's been saying this Sunday night:
"The Rutgers/Michigan game in the B1G tourney is now essentially a play OUT game. Neither team is guaranteed a spot with a win."
Got the game as well as WSU won by 17 , 69-52. Good start to the day.Interesting. California has been routinely blown out this year and Washington State is on a 6 game winning streak. I couldn’t resist and the spread was Wash State -13.5 and -7.5 first half. I took both.
I see that the first half just ended with Wash State up 14 with a 35-21 score. Glad I can cash first bet and hopefully by posting here it doesn’t jinx game bet which is for a lot more than 1st half bet.
Seriously though Wash State would have won 7 straight and would play Oregon , another bid stealer tomorrow. We have to watch them since we want no thiefs
I am really hoping his selections are incredibly wrong.He is pissing me off. He is being lazy , sloppy and this latest take is the worst yet. He says we have 4 bad losses. We have 1 , Minnesota.Seton Hall is not a bad loss. Then Temple without two starters. The other two were bad for sure. Thankfully the Committee will actually dig into our Q3 losses.
That was sunday night right after the game...tell me where he commented today on a status with a loss
We’re actually below SHU nowYeah but Seton Hall is Q3 so now we’re 17th team out
He commented on Rutgers once today, saying the Seton Hall loss is concerning, since we now have 4 bad losses...and no other team projected in the field will have that many.
So I'd assume his thoughts still stand..since he didn't say anything else about changing that thought.
We dont have 4 bad losses
Got the game as well as WSU won by 17 , 69-52. Good start to the day.
I am really hoping his selections are incredibly wrong.He is pissing me off. He is being lazy , sloppy and this latest take is the worst yet. He says we have 4 bad losses. We have 1 , Minnesota.
Losing to Temple in the first game without 2 starters , a team who beat # 1 Houston and was beating them for 25 minutes in rematch is not a bad loss.
Nebraska is not a bad loss as they have been playing well and beat Wisconsin , Rutgers , Penn State , Northwestern , Maryland and Iowa down the stretch and blew a 15 point lead against Michigan State. They also beat Creighton before they lost 2 starters and went 2-6 until Hoiberg adjusted.
Losing to Seton Hall is not a bad loss . If it was a Quad 2 yesterday and they lost today and now Quad 3 doesn’t make it a bad loss. It was a rivalry game.
He focuses exclusively Quads only . Kentucky has a bad loss. Michigan has a bad loss , Iowa has a bad loss , Iowa State has multiple including being blown out a number of times. The first 3 are all Quad 4 losses. I don’t hear anyone kicking Kentucky or Iowa State out of tourney or not giving Michigan a chance to make it because they lost to Central Michigan at home. It is bullshit , devoid of logic , creates bad takes that get repeated into stupidity.
His failure to point out the 4 road wins at Purdue , NW, Wisconsin and Penn State ( not to mention the OSU screw job ) where we would be 5-5 on the road , road wins that the Committee values , to counteract his negative takes is irresponsible. I just tweeted at him calling him out for not doing his homework.
Rutgers win tomorrow and we avoid Dayton?
I’m seeing Alcorn was like a point favoriteSWAC top seed Alcorn State is going to lose to the 8 seed Texas Southern in the quarterfinals
I’m seeing Alcorn was like a point favorite
Lunardi says oklahoma st is in now. Love their coach. Boynton is great
That's not a tournament resumeWhen they lose tomorrow they are 18-15 and 6-12 in q1, 1-11 in upper Q1 games, and 10-14 Q2 and only 4 wins vs schools in field
This is a joke isn’t it. I just checked out their schedule for the first time. They lost 2x each to the top 4 teams in the Big 12 , Kansas, Texas , Baylor and Kansas State . They split with TCU getting blown out by 25 in the loss . They swept Iowa State by 8 and 2 points. That is their best wins period. They got a terrible Ole Miss team in the challenge and won and lost out of conference to Southern Illinois , Central Florida , UConn and Va. Tech. They literally have no good or decent out of conference wins. None unless you consider DePaul or Wichita State a good team / not !!! What a shallow resume.Lunardi says oklahoma st is in now. Love their coach. Boynton is great
My guess is the big 12 is a meat grinder and by far the best conference in america so that is weighed + they only have one bad loss (q3)This is a joke isn’t it. I just checked out their schedule for the first time. They lost 2x each to the top 4 teams in the Big 12 , Kansas, Texas , Baylor and Kansas State . They split with TCU getting blown out by 25 in the loss . They swept Iowa State by 8 and 2 points. That is their best wins period. They got a terrible Ole Miss team in the challenge and won and lost out of conference to Southern Illinois , Central Florida , UConn and Va. Tech. They literally have no good or decent out of conference wins. None unless you consider DePaul or Wichita State a good team / not !!! What a shallow resume.
How Lunardi has them next to us at the moment as the last 4 in , is just horrendous bracketology by him. I heard he moved them in tonight bc they beat Oklahoma. Are you kidding me ? If they get their ass handed to them by Texas tomorrow they should be way out. I could not believe their schedule and results and expected some quality wins but they almost have none. They have 3 road wins against the bottom of the league Oklahoma , Texas Tech plus that Iowa State win. That is it.
The answer is probably somewhere in the middle (ie. where bac stands).My guess is the big 12 is a meat grinder and by far the best conference in america so that is weighed + they only have one bad loss (q3)
Your boy Wachtel says ESPN is wrong on Okie StateMy guess is the big 12 is a meat grinder and by far the best conference in america so that is weighed + they only have one bad loss (q3)
My guess is the big 12 is a meat grinder and by far the best conference in america so that is weighed + they only have one bad loss (q3)
Your guy Bracketville Dave agrees about Okie State not being in yet tooLunardi shilling for Big 12..why didn't you post Brads tweet calling him out
There is no such thing as lock at 18-15
I agree but (like me) you're wear Rutgers glasses and know the details. Do these decision makers REALLY go that deep? I know talking heads do...and maybe they do cause they have all this time to pre-plan...Got the game as well as WSU won by 17 , 69-52. Good start to the day.
I am really hoping his selections are incredibly wrong.He is pissing me off. He is being lazy , sloppy and this latest take is the worst yet. He says we have 4 bad losses. We have 1 , Minnesota.
Losing to Temple in the first game without 2 starters , a team who beat # 1 Houston and was beating them for 25 minutes in rematch is not a bad loss.
Nebraska is not a bad loss as they have been playing well and beat Wisconsin , Rutgers , Penn State , Northwestern , Maryland and Iowa down the stretch and blew a 15 point lead against Michigan State. They also beat Creighton before they lost 2 starters and went 2-6 until Hoiberg adjusted.
Losing to Seton Hall is not a bad loss . If it was a Quad 2 yesterday and they lost today and now Quad 3 doesn’t make it a bad loss. It was a rivalry game.
He focuses exclusively Quads only . Kentucky has a bad loss. Michigan has a bad loss , Iowa has a bad loss , Iowa State has multiple including being blown out a number of times. The first 3 are all Quad 4 losses. I don’t hear anyone kicking Kentucky or Iowa State out of tourney or not giving Michigan a chance to make it because they lost to Central Michigan at home. It is bullshit , devoid of logic , creates bad takes that get repeated into stupidity.
His failure to point out the 4 road wins at Purdue , NW, Wisconsin and Penn State ( not to mention the OSU screw job ) where we would be 5-5 on the road , road wins that the Committee values , to counteract his negative takes is irresponsible. I just tweeted at him calling him out for not doing his homework.
Because i didnt see it lolLunardi shilling for Big 12..why didn't you post Brads tweet calling him out
There is no such thing as lock at 18-15
I really don’t know off hand, what is rutegrs upper Q1 record?When they lose tomorrow they are 18-15 and 6-12 in q1, 1-11 in upper Q1 games, and 10-14 Q2 and only 4 wins vs schools in field
2-5, and 3-1 in the lower half. Plus we have that MSU win that is considered a home game. They are #31 NET today, so they would get us another Q1 win if they go up just one slot.I really don’t know off hand, what is rutegrs upper Q1 record?
You are really trying hard to defend them and fallen for this bad loss crap. Losing at home to Southern Illinois is a bad loss. Losing to Central Florida and VA . Tech on neutral floors are bad losses. Southern Illinois loss at home is worse than Temple loss on a neutral ( leaving aside we were missing Caleb and Paul ) as using your Quad system they are 122 in Net to Temple ‘s 125. UCF is 71 and Seton Hall dropped to 78 after the DePaul loss. If you and your buddy Brad want to call that a bad loss then UCF is a bad loss.My guess is the big 12 is a meat grinder and by far the best conference in america so that is weighed + they only have one bad loss (q3)