BACATOLOGY: 3/6 NCAA TOURNAMENT ANALYSIS***RUTGERS PROJECTED 11 SEED***
- Thread starter bac2therac
- Start date
A
anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy
Guest
Im not trying anything. Im just spitballing what is likely lunardis reasoning. I agree they shouldnt be in unless they beat texas.
A
anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy
Guest
might be....the other two acc bubbles are ahead of them supposedly but not all that far ahead. UNC has strong sos and clean profile. Note the wins over Charleston and Michigan to add to UVA and NCState and beating UVA a 2nd time could be enough, really close
should Clemson beat NC State, it would mean the Wolfpack lost 3 times to Clemson. Things get interesting if UNC beats Virginia. I think in that case the Clemson/UNC winner could have a case and possibly at the expense of NC State
i dont do NIT but I am sure they will be considered along with Nova and St Johns and I think those 2 are likely ahead of them in any NIT pecking order...being just 16-15 hurts. Their net alone would probably qualify them if they went strictly by that
Just checked out bracketmatrix this morning we are on 78/99 entries . OKla State on 22/99. So Lunardi is an outlier here.
So where is Rutgers relative to Wisconsin with a loss
Where is Rutgers relative to Michigan with a loss and Michigan with a 10 point loss to Purdue
What about the OSU idol RU found.
Where is Rutgers relative to Michigan with a loss and Michigan with a 10 point loss to Purdue
What about the OSU idol RU found.
With a loss slightly still ahead of Wisconsin
Probably a whisker behind Michigan
Basically the inevitable loss to Michigan puts us as out , everything needs to break right to get into Dayton
yes a remember its all grouping of teams so RU, Michigan, Wisconsin, Penn State could all be in a grouping together..tough call
Let me preface by saying we aren’t playing well, that being said and body of work.
I see these resumes online—-
Nc state: 1-6 in Q1
okie state: 6-11 in Q1 including 1-11 in high q1
penn state: basically same profile as us but we have two less q2 losses (and h2h if that matters)
you know damn well if UM wins today, we will hear they should be in over RU due to the season sweep.
how are these teams in over us per wachtel. I just don’t get it. Seems to me these guys and maybe the committee value “clean profiles”. So is the strategy to have a full schedule v q2 this way you can never have a bad loss?
I see these resumes online—-
Nc state: 1-6 in Q1
okie state: 6-11 in Q1 including 1-11 in high q1
penn state: basically same profile as us but we have two less q2 losses (and h2h if that matters)
you know damn well if UM wins today, we will hear they should be in over RU due to the season sweep.
how are these teams in over us per wachtel. I just don’t get it. Seems to me these guys and maybe the committee value “clean profiles”. So is the strategy to have a full schedule v q2 this way you can never have a bad loss?
we are 18-13..at some point record matters, we also have 4 Q3 losses. NC State is 4 games better in record without those losses, have to balance somewhere
They play in a league with some very bad teams this year. I mean we crushed wake and lost a late game on road to their conf champ While short handed.
Thats still not known..lots still in flux
Palm still have Michigan in over us ? Clown.
B1G post game seems to think we can rest easy now that we won.
We were hanging on to the tourney by our fingernails. I think we climbed back to a ledge today.
yep Iowa State after sputtering shoring up their spot probably on the 5 line. I still like Baylor as a 2
Similar threads
