BACATOLOGY: NCAA ANALYSIS 3/7......NEW UPDATE 3/12 1PM PAGE 37
- Thread starter bac2therac
- Start date
We won twelve in a much better conference and beat Purdue, Illinois and Wisconsin ( on road)
Yes!
Exactly for all BAC’s know how and knowledge there is still a huge human element. Doubt CBS leaves ND out. Maybe Wake.
Jerry is one of the worst bracket guys around and is biased. Don’t listen to him
I've noticed that most younger guys (and Palm) who are slaves to the metrics have Rutgers out while more old school guys have them in. My hunch is the committee leans more old school but it's a complete toss up what they do with us.
If Dayton with their THREE Q4 losses gets an at large over us I'll riot. But I do think they're more likely to beat Davidson tomorrow.
It's not hard to predict 5.games tomorrow and how they rank after each result, Ivy winner, SEC, B1G easy, only way things change is if Tulane plays tomorrow vs Memphis/SMU, root for the Memphis/SMU winner if Tulane beats Houston, and who they would knock out, just noticed Davidson won, so root for Richmond, 0 Q1 wins, over Dayton, Q1 3-2 Q2 5-3, Dayton would be considered a play in going 1-1 today/tomorrow, 3-3, 6-3, 6-1.
Last edited:
8 minutes left in first half of MSU v Purdue.
MSU has 4 fouls
Purdue has 2 fouls.
Ridiculous!
MSU has 4 fouls
Purdue has 2 fouls.
Ridiculous!
Honestly Michigan St wins it all and gives us a 7th Q1 win.
FFS Indiana was down to Michigan 41-28 at the half in this tourney 2 DAYS AGO! They probably meant they are 'clearly a different team these last few HOURS' lmao.
Wake didn't look very good losing to a piss poor BC team .....They're at best a .500 team in the Big Ten.
It's too soon for the NCAA to do anything, but after reading the allegations, I'm starting to seriously wonder if LSU might pull themselves out to open up another spot in the dance.
Nantz-hill-raff were discussing which BIG schools are going to be in the tournament. No rutgers mention
2nd/3rd hand information. Is it true we are 1-6
when Bo Boroski officiates and 17-7 when not??
when Bo Boroski officiates and 17-7 when not??
They’re probably just reading a Jerry Palm prediction since he’s the CBS bracketologist. Wouldn’t read into it.
Contigencies he said. Probably 2 based on va tech and smu...he said less than 6 at larges left to be selected
The younger guy ahead of their skis falling in love with efficiency ratings. Thosecratings appear on sheet but there is no evidence yet they are used substantially
I was gonna mention that. Terrible job not at least putting us in the discussion. Raf? WTF.
To be fair reffing had zero to do with a number of those losses (specifically Illinois and Seton Hall)
Well apparently the field will be decided tonight except for bid stealing contingency
They are 4-9 in q1 and 2
That is atrocious
They may get in..they should not get in if the committee follows it criteria
If Rutgers doesn't get in there won't be anyone other that the B1G arguing for us unfortunately. Don't see the talking heads supporting us.
Houston looks to be cruising now. Would make us 3/4 today if they win. Dayton is concerning if they hold the lead, but a Davidson win tomorrow regardless is what would be needed
I mean... yeah
Illinois smoked us, Seton Hall was far and away the better team in December. Fouls weren't the problem against Northwestern or Wisconsin. I don't remember them being the problem against Lafayette either
Similar threads
