BACATOLOGY: NCAA ANALYSIS 3/7......NEW UPDATE 3/12 1PM PAGE 37
- Thread starter bac2therac
- Start date
VTech I don’t know. They have an extra loss over A&M and @Miami and UNC (neutral) are their only wins over so called NCAA locks and those teams are hardly getting good seeds. Like A&M, they beat ND on a neutral floor but A&M has 3 other wins over teams that are solidly in the field. Much better resume.
But it doesn't. It doesn't in any way. They have a record against a schedule just like anyone else.
There are enough games and enough parity in college basketball (not to mention an autobid system that makes it literally impossible to get left out if you are undefeated) that you don't need this extra stuff.
Sure, it helps you if you want to run some crusade against "bad" out of conference scheduling but it doesn't actually help you evaluate the teams.
No - I’m talking about as of this morning which includes everything to date. The win yesterday should’ve locked them in. Or at least it put their resume on a different wave length from the SF types anyway.
How the actual **** does knowing whether Murray St's game against Memphis was "in conference" or "out of conference" help you evaluate Murray St?
You have to see how ****ing stupid that sounds?
Not safe..he has 2 teams out that are likely in now. Thats removing 2 schools. Rutgers isnt insulated from the first 4 at all..so as you see as each new school comes in the field it puts RU in more danger
If Indiana wins this and the Big Ten championship how's that so bad for us? We did beat them on their court like 2 weeks ago.
Because mid majors who schedule strong get credit over those who dont
True. By safe I meant in the field. I think we are destined for first four anyways and I’m fine with it.
BECAUSE THEY HAVE BETTER SCHEDULES, OVERALL. NOT BECAUSE THE STRONG GAME WAS OUT OF CONFERENCE
If Rutgers was an independent but we played the same schedule, should we somehow be evaluated differently??????????
We only played them once. On their floor.
Look the committee has stessed NON CONFERENCE PERFORMANCES IS IMPORTANT..DO YOU CHALLENGE YOURSELF. DO YOU PLAY ON THE ROAD
ROAD WINS VERY IMPORTANT
THE COMMITTEE IS STUPID AND HAS OVER-COMPLICATED THIS SHIT TO THE POINT OF ABSURDITY
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CAPS
(Yes I know I started the caps)
Bohannon hitting shots late in the season is a big difference maker for Iowa.
But also you didn't answer the question:
Ignoring the committee for a second, do you actually think that
Rutgers (independent) 18-13, all out of conference, same schedule and wins/losses as Real Rutgers
vs
Real Rutgers (Big Ten) all the real stats
are actually different resumes that SHOULD (not would, SHOULD) be evaluated differently?
WOW! That’s 4-straight 3’s PLUS a 3-point play down the stretch for Iowa.
We already have a bye per everyone other than Rosy Palm.
I think it’s important if you only have a few chances against top teams and don’t win those. Look back and you won’t really find examples of teams like Rutgers punished for a weak OOC. Honestly - if we lost the Clemson game and won Lafayette we’d probably be locked in.
Even then..
no one plays an overall schedule weak enough that they can't get in with enough wins.
A 30-3 Texas A&M CC has a shot at an at large bid
A 31-2 one definitely gets it
Does this keep us in front of Indiana now?
The only true bid stealers are the 3 A-10 teams not named Davidson, Tulane, VA Tech could earn a play in with a close loss to Duke. A&M was already in before today's game, obviously a given now.
SMU is higher in selection, but weaker resume, NET, Memphis better resume, NET but lower because of losses, SMU vs Memphis, it's hard to deny SMU with 3:wins over Memphis and Houston.
Indiana is in but lower than us, Indiana Q1/2 8-12, Q123 13-13, Rutgers Q1/2 9-10, Q123 13-12, they would have jumped us with a win.
SMU is higher in selection, but weaker resume, NET, Memphis better resume, NET but lower because of losses, SMU vs Memphis, it's hard to deny SMU with 3:wins over Memphis and Houston.
Indiana is in but lower than us, Indiana Q1/2 8-12, Q123 13-13, Rutgers Q1/2 9-10, Q123 13-12, they would have jumped us with a win.
We got 2/3 in this session.
Indiana losing close doesn’t hurt that much, but keeps them from blowing past us.
St Louis no longer an option.
Texas A&M could be a problem though
Indiana losing close doesn’t hurt that much, but keeps them from blowing past us.
St Louis no longer an option.
Texas A&M could be a problem though
Good to know Iowa can bank in 3s to win games against other teams too.
Similar threads
