Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"The Scarlet Knights have two quality losses against top-three teams. If they were in the SEC, they'd be ranked 12th right now."
Funny. It's amazing how much respect we're getting from that OSU performance. I thought the cheap TD they tacked on at the end was going to cloud our performance from a national perspective. But it seems people paid close attention and know the game was much closer than the score. If we beat Iowa, we will be in the top 25 on Monday. It's a coin flip on paper. I hope the football Gods are kind.
It’s about how the SEC teams get treated for “good losses”Votes? Yes. Top 25? No.
It’s about how the SEC teams get treated for “good losses”
Not only that, it's when the bottom teams in the SEC beat the top teams, they just move the bottom teams up and it barely affects the top teams rankings. It skews all the computer rankings. So their argument about Alabama, for example, it based on numbers that are artificially inflated by overrated teams. Then when all the SEC teams lose in the bowls, the excuse is because the games were meaningless.It’s about how the SEC teams get treated for “good losses”
The link was "LOL".Was it just my computer or was there no link? Or am I missing something?
CFP Anger Index: Is the committee actually overlooking ... Alabama?!?!
Which teams should be upset about the most recent CFP rankings?www.espn.com
Love the line about the Iowa offense: here's Iowa, whose game film is used to quell prison riots
Votes in AP/Coaches, but 100% top 25 in the CFP ranking with a win over Iowa. Two losses to #1 and #3 plus a win over #22.Votes? Yes. Top 25? No.
Ironically, the loss to a #1 had us lose the 2 votes we had the week before.
After checking the record of the team. Doesn't really consider quality wins and losses outside of SEC bias.Those voters probably vote on the basis of the Sunday paper score listing.