shhh. Don't ruin their whiny little narrative.Walker has -43 yards rushing this year and 0 TDs with 5 INTs against FBS teams.
shhh. Don't ruin their whiny little narrative.Walker has -43 yards rushing this year and 0 TDs with 5 INTs against FBS teams.
Calling it here.Calling it here.
Laviano steps up with a big game this week vs Iowa.
Then what happens when we play the big boys, I'll tell you what,Laviano is ranked last in B10 QBR rating
Let's see, last year against Michigan State 15/24, 3 TDs, 208 yards and no INT.Then what happens when we play the big boys, I'll tell you what,
those coaches better get him out of there, before he gets seriously injured.
How is it possible for a P5 program to have 3 P5 level QBs sitting on the bench and not one of them is better than the 120th best QB in the country?!
Didn't want to post a new thread about Tommy DeVito since some people might get upset.
Why don't we go after him late in the recruiting process around Dec-Feb? Most of the big boy programs take 2 QB if they are good enough each season. We are after Pro Set QB in 2017 so that's not the excuse. We can use 2 good QB next year in different situations. Almost all great programs take both Pro and Duel Threat QB and adapt. Houston QB is a throwing QB that happen to be able to run as a second option.
Ash should keep it in mind but don't get Jonathan upset. I thought Tommy really wanted Rutgers.We could still recruit Devito. He can't sign until February.
And what system would be thrive in?It's true Laviano still hasn't shown much to date but keep in mind it's only 3 games in with a new system. I do not blame the coaches at all for sticking with him to this point. I'd just like to see another qb in there playing real time in case he really doesn't work out.
And what system would be thrive in?
The way I see it , he is 0 for 2
Here are Carroo's stats from those two games:Let's see, last year against Michigan State 15/24, 3 TDs, 208 yards and no INT.
Against Indiana, 28/42 for 386 yards, 3 TDs, 1 INT.
Maybe he will improve. Don't leave that option out of your narrow view. If he does not, well, then the coaches will do what they need to do.
So your saying it's a lack of weapons that is the issue?Here are Carroo's stats from those two games:
(vs. Michigan St.) 7 rec./134 yds./3 TDs
(vs. Indiana) 7 rec./157 yds./3 TDs
Carroo accounted for all six touchdowns. If you take Carroo's production out, Laviano had a YPA of 4.35 and 6.54 for those games.
Want he the top rated big10 Qb last year according to a poster here?
why did he bring in allen? play him, what can we lose, we are not going to compete with the status quo. 3 years is a bunch of crap, check out what other programs are doing with first year under the radar qb'sAsh knows he's not the guy! But this is what Flood left you. I hope people are finally seeing this. Ash needs to implement his own recruits and it will take 3 years or more before we see a solid team on the field. If he does it before then, he's a genius.
Having Carroo around masked some of Laviano's shortcomings.I think he was saying Leonte Carroo was talented enough to catch a good portion of Laviano's bad passes where as other receivers don't.
He misses his receivers too often. He over throws short passes. He routinely turns the receiver around when they are forced to adjust to bad passes. This takes them out of stride (especially on the short swing passes) and allows recovery time for the defense. He constantly throws very badly off his back foot even when there is no pressure. I could go on, but I want to know what part of "below average at best" receivers forces his bad throws and footwork?
Also, I don't believe that we have mediocre receivers. Good QB play elevates everyone on the offense. It mostly seems that what good plays that we have are despite Laviano. He is not elevating anyone at this point. Hopefully the light goes on for him this weekend.
Come on man! Where do I mention separation? There were plenty of plays where the receiver was wide open. Particularly on the swing passes in the flats. He would miss them or just throw a bad pass that made them stop, jump, turn them around, etc. If they were completed, the inability to hit a window that allowed receivers to keep their stride allowed the D to recover and limit the gains. He even over threw guys that were 10 yards away when there was no defender between he and the receiver.So the QB is supposed to create separation between the receivers and their defenders now? Come on man. Our receivers are absolutely not good. None of them has done a single thing to deserve any recognition outside of Grant (and that too, not so much as a receiver).
Caroo was an above average receiver and Laviano was able to get him the ball just fine.
Kyle for QB coach [banana]:cool2:[roll]Want he the top rated big10 Qb last year according to a poster here?
Ya I know what he was saying, but the counter argument has merit as well.I think he was saying Leonte Carroo was talented enough to catch a good portion of Laviano's bad passes where as other receivers don't.
I didn't realize he's rated so high.
So your saying it's a lack of weapons that is the issue?
How is it possible for a P5 program to have 3 P5 level QBs sitting on the bench and not one of them is better than the 120th best QB in the country?!
Just ask Joe Montana and Steve Young about Jerry Rice.Ya I know what he was saying, but the counter argument has merit as well.
And I'm no fan boy of Laviano, but many QB's in the country enjoy the benefit of high quality receivers.
The QB-WR relationship is a symbiotic one.
Bull. Not everyone is pro material. 90% of college receivers can get the job done. This falls more on the QB than the receivers. Say the ball is somewhere between the left hash and the middle of the field. The receivers is to the right of the formation somewhere between the right hash and the numbers. When a receiver pushes a DB up the field for a 12 yds out route with an inside release, the DB will shade to the inside taking it away a possible crossing/skinny post/etc. Now, when the receiver plants hard inside then breaks outside at about 10 to 11 yards he will have the DB by a foot or two due the DB's reaction and position on the play. By the time the receiver plants hard inside it's the job of the QB to have already thrown the ball to the outside mark, so when the receiver turns he head and body the ball is there. The defender doesn't stand a chance of making a play on the ball.Ya I know what he was saying, but the counter argument has merit as well.
And I'm no fanboy of Laviano, but many QB's in the country enjoy the benefit of high quality receivers.
The QB-WR relationship is a symbiotic one.
Not trying to beat a dead horse, but
Here are Carroo's stats from those two games:
(vs. Michigan St.) 7 rec./134 yds./3 TDs
(vs. Indiana) 7 rec./157 yds./3 TDs
Carroo accounted for all six touchdowns. If you take Carroo's production out, Laviano had a YPA of 4.35 and 6.54 for those games.
How is it possible for a P5 program to have 3 P5 level QBs sitting on the bench and not one of them is better than the 120th best QB in the country?!
What would you expect, when you hire a kid for OC,who keeps sayingDespite his shortcomings I will still support Laviano(even though I am NOT fond of him), coach ASHs decisions and the team. [thumb2]
I would LOVE to see GIO in a few running plays and TCU guy gets another set,,,,and lets not forget
[banana]Oden....[banana]
hey,,Laviano is DUE for an uncharacteristic GOOD game LOL:football:
What would you expect, when you hire a kid for OC,who keeps saying
how well he and Laviano got along during the summer. Are we ever going
to play 500 ball again with this kind of mismanagement?
I really don't know how much the "new system" is an issue here. Sure if Laviano could make plays with his feet that would be great, but I don't think he is missing throws, or showing bad mechanics because of the new system.It's entirely unjustified to criticize an OC after 3 games installing a completely different offense at a school that is entirely comprised of players recruited for a different system. If this were a couple seasons in... different story.