Looks like someone is trying hard to rewrite history to support the anti cd bias.
Objectively he has had the best hands and it seems really strained (and not much more then defense of pre existing bias) to try so hard to argue against a sure handed receiver (when catching is a major issue) getting a few more reps.
Objectively he has had the best hands and it seems really strained (and not much more then defense of pre existing bias) to try so hard to argue against a sure handed receiver (when catching is a major issue) getting a few more reps.