Go Wisky
- Thread starter zappaa
- Start date
Maybe not Go Wisky....lol
Just read something where we should root for IOWA
Just read something where we should root for IOWA
I want to finish ahead of Wisconsin.
Mathematically it makes more sense to root for Wisconsin if we’re trying to get that coveted double bye in the B1Gs (unreal even typing that) way way WAY early to start thinking that ourselves but for some help with others, it definitely benefits us having a team we beat (and thus have tiebreaker with) win over a team that we lost to (and thus would pass us). An Iowa loss would put both of those teams at 4 losses and we still only have 3
we beat Wisky and have a chance for another one...they are hanging around Q1/Q2 border so actually I would prefer they beat Iowa
they are but Wisky has a system that has its advantages, if they can stick to their gameplan and execute this will be a game if not they will lose by 20
Wisky is purposely slowing the pace down. Which is the opposite of what we did
Announcers talking about Rutgers. Gotta love it.
Iowa shooting 0-8 from 3...of course.
And Connor McCaffery being whiny. Wonder where he learned that.
And Connor McCaffery being whiny. Wonder where he learned that.
The McCaffrey kid reminds me of one of the players from Hoosiers.
Iowa started 0-10 from three and just hit their first - if they shot like that against us, we'd have blown them out, lol.
I dont expect it to last but seeing Garza go 3-8 in the half and the team 1-11 from behind the arc, many of those wide open looks, is pretty annoying. We would've rolled them if they shot like this last week. They may have assumed the W with Wisconsin shorthanded, and we got the A game effort after we blew them out last season.
Did the announcers say that’s what Fran did? If true that should not be allowed. It’s asking the refs to aid in your strategy. What if the foul is not warranted or not executed properly? Seems like there should be a rule against a head coach telling the refs he’s gonna have his team foul in advance.
It's not that uncommon. There's a difference between an "intentional" regular foul to stop the clock and/or put the other team on the line, like a reach-in, and a formal "intentional" foul (now called a flagrant foul), which is a foul using excessive force. As per the NCAA rules, "This offense includes the former "intentional foul" of fouling an opposing player to prevent an easy breakaway score."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flagrant_foul
Wow. Doesn’t seem right to allow it. I think if a coach says that to a ref, it should be a technical.
