BTW - can we wait, I don't know, maybe half a season before claiming any of us can "get a feel" of a HC in his 1st season? lol....
Stubbornness at QB, notepad writing, not competing, KICKING A FIELD GOAL DOWN BY 45
What the hell
Did people forget us losing to a putrid 2-9 UConn team at home in 2001? How about hanging on for a nail-biting 23-17 win over winless Navy when they were absolutely terrible? How about Pitt being up 42-0 in the 2nd quarter? How about the awesome 5 points we scored against 4-7 Temple?
"ohhhhh ohhhhh but we're not that bad"...yeah, and we weren't playing Top 15 OOC games or playing in the B1G either. It's all relative.
Joe P.
80-7 and BuffaNova.
stop...our cupboard is not that bare and this team, school, and expectations are light years ahead of this. Piss fking poor coaching was on display today, not a lack of talentDid people forget us losing to a putrid 2-9 UConn team at home in 2001? How about hanging on for a nail-biting 23-17 win over winless Navy when they were absolutely terrible? How about Pitt being up 42-0 in the 2nd quarter? How about the awesome 5 points we scored against 4-7 Temple?
"ohhhhh ohhhhh but we're not that bad"...yeah, and we weren't playing Top 15 OOC games or playing in the B1G either. It's all relative.
Joe P.
stop...our cupboard is not that bare and this team, school, and expectations are light years ahead of this. Piss fking poor coaching was on display today, not a lack of talent
You pick and stick with Laviano in game 1 when you are a new head coach to avoid losing your upper class men. You don't do what GS did with cubit and Chad . And I was a GS fan and hated flood.
You play your starters and try to get them reps, esp when installing new system.
I hope drew can alter offense to better fit personnel. But I think Laviano won't be starter long.
How about giving Washington credit.
Correct, after the first quarter, this game a was nothing more than a game scrimmage. Running the "one wild knight" was clearly a test run.The call to go for the FG was to practice live FG tries. A TD (or more likely failed TD) wasn't going to make a difference. Earlier he did go for it on 4th down instead of kicking a FG.
If Laviano looked bad, just image how the guys that couldn't beat him out for the job would have looked. Amazing that you guys don't get that.Hate to say it but it sure did. I don;t care about the writing or the FG but our boy Laviano looked B A D. I was half expecting a backup to start the 2nd half.
What Ash inherited far, far exceeds what Schiano inherited, in both the players, the facilities and the program. No comparison whatsoever.Did people forget us losing to a putrid 2-9 UConn team at home in 2001? How about hanging on for a nail-biting 23-17 win over winless Navy when they were absolutely terrible? How about Pitt being up 42-0 in the 2nd quarter? How about the awesome 5 points we scored against 4-7 Temple?
What Ash inherited far, far exceeds what Schiano inherited, in both the players, the facilities and the program. No comparison whatsoever.
For the love of God. To compare one game from a brand new head coach traveling cross country to four years of ineptitude from the previous regime defies belief.
People need to take a deep breath and at least give this group a full season before casting him in the same lot as Flood.
For the love of God. To compare one game from a brand new head coach traveling cross country to four years of ineptitude from the previous regime defies belief.
People need to take a deep breath and at least give this group a full season before casting him in the same lot as Flood.
I guess USC hired the wrong guy, too. Getting man-handled by 'Bama. 80 total yards, 3 points, midway through the 3rd. Down 31-3.
That's a strawman argument and not what this discussion is about.Ash also didn't inherit what Flood did from Schiano in 2012.
The talent level of the players Ash inherited is head and shoulders above what Schiano got. Absolutely no comparison. Hell, he had to tap a tight end (Boehrer) and a fullback (Pilch) for his first 4-5 years to play center. We had no depth whatsoever. And our schedule always included Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, Boston College, Syracuse and Miami, of whom usually half or more of those teams were ranked....and Schiano didn't play in the B1G or open up against the #14 team in the country...and we still lost to some putrid, putrid teams where the 'talent' argument goes out the window (2002 Buffalo, 2001 UConn).
And a good number of Schiano's, one of which was subbed out for one of Flood's recruits, because the former was getting beaten like a drum at the line of scrimmage.Ash is coaching floods recruits.
That's a strawman argument and not what this discussion is about.
The talent level of the players Ash inherited is head and shoulders above what Schiano got. Absolutely no comparison. Hell, he had to tap a tight end (Boehrer) and a fullback (Pilch) for his first 4-5 years to play center. We had no depth whatsoever. And our schedule always included Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, Boston College, Syracuse and Miami, of whom usually half or more of those teams were ranked.
And a good number of Schiano's, one of which was subbed out for one of Flood's recruits, because the former was getting beaten like a drum at the line of scrimmage.
I think the talent Ash inherited probably didn't improve as much as they should after playing under Flood and his staff and now with the change in offense bringing out that talent is harder for Ash to do.That's a strawman argument and not what this discussion is about.
The talent level of the players Ash inherited is head and shoulders above what Schiano got. Absolutely no comparison. Hell, he had to tap a tight end (Boehrer) and a fullback (Pilch) for his first 4-5 years to play center. We had no depth whatsoever. And our schedule always included Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, Boston College, Syracuse and Miami, of whom usually half or more of those teams were ranked.
BULLSHIT. 3 straight years of crap recruiting has depleted our ranks. Even some of our starters shouldn't be out there on a 1st team and many of us have realized this for a while now. Also, look how bad our ST's have gotten as the perfect example of a lack of quality depth, and speed, currently in this program. Flood's recruiting has put a serious dent into things. Now, that doesn't mean the coaching couldn't have been better today - it damn well could have - but it's game freakin' 1 of the guy's career. Shit's gonna happen.
Remember 80-7? Remember BuffaNova?
That's a strawman argument and not what this discussion is about.
The talent level of the players Ash inherited is head and shoulders above what Schiano got. Absolutely no comparison. Hell, he had to tap a tight end (Boehrer) and a fullback (Pilch) for his first 4-5 years to play center. We had no depth whatsoever. And our schedule always included Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, Boston College, Syracuse and Miami, of whom usually half or more of those teams were ranked.
Don't know. Just know that this specific question was brought up in the presser and Ash addressed it. Look, I am not picking on Schiano's recruits vs. Flood's recruits. But this blanket argument about Flood's recruits being the sole reason for today's performance is ridiculous....and how'd the rest fare?
Joe P.
Don't know. Just know that this specific question was brought up in the presser and Ash addressed it. Look, I am not picking on Schiano's recruits vs. Flood's recruits. But this blanket argument about Flood's recruits being the sole reason for today's performance is ridiculous.
The overall average level of competition in the Big Ten is a little better than what we faced in the old Big East, but both Miami and Virginia Tech were Top 10 teams during the first years of Schiano's tenure. Hell, in his 2nd year, he faced #1 Miami, #3 Virginia Tech, #8 Notre Dame and #11 Tennessee....and again there's still a relative scale -up in terms of competition that you for some reason won't recognize. cuse wasn't ranked after 2001.
Well, it sure as hell sounds like you're arguing exactly that.I would hope no one is arguing the last point, ...But this blanket argument about Flood's recruits being the sole reason for today's performance is ridiculous.
I think we agree. But as I just posted elsewhere--it was new coaches, implementing new schemes against a killer DL, with a talent differential. Nobody is naive to not acknowledge the third point, but there are some posts here inferring that this is the SOLE reason for today's blowout. Today's game was like putting a rock band in a battle of bands against jazz bands, where the rock band never played jazz live. I am not discouraged by today's result. Good coaches and teams will take the learning experience and turn the page.I would hope no one is arguing the last point, but it's pretty obvious that it's likely a big contributing factor. Not the only factor, but the people trying to minimize it look more out of touch than someone trying to sell VCR's at $1000 a pop.
Joe P.
You do realize Ross was injured last year and he torched defenses in 2014. Not many defenders were going to keep up with him. And I am not supporting Flood or judging Ash. BTW Ash recognized Ross' speed and ability in his presser. Sometimes you have to give credit to the playmaker and not blame the defender.The Flood supporters are out in force today I see.
Anybody with half a football brain could see that the talent difference between the two teams is night and day. When Wharton got smoked, he wasn't out of position, the other kid was simply faster. Washington returned 9 starters on offense last year from a team that averaged 40 points a game their last 6 games, kicking on all offensive cylinders. And, they also returned their fastest offensive player (Ross) who didn't even play last year to that squad. And lest we forget, this is probably the best defense in the Pac 12.
People judging Ash based on this game are simply stupid.
You do realize Ross was injured last year and he torched defenses in 2014. Not many defenders were going to keep up with him. And I am not supporting Flood or judging Ash. BTW Ash recognized Ross' speed and ability in his presser. Sometimes you have to give credit to the playmaker and not blame the defender.
Good god no! Once Schiano started changing the schedule around 2004-2005, we had a pretty easy OOC schedule and, of course, with the loss of Miami and Virginia Tech, the BE schedule got a mite easier. But the first couple of years the OOC schedule was set before Schiano's time, and, with the squad he inherited from Shea, we pretty much were an ass-whoopin' waiting to happen.Lulz. Did you really just argue our BE +Schiano-doctored OOC was as tough as this year's schedule.
Well, it sure as hell sounds like you're arguing exactly that.
And Ross was recruited as a cornerback and a tope 250 player in his class. He is elite. It is going to take us a while to recruit at the elite level.That's my point. That team was smoking teams by an average of 40 point a game in their last 6 games. Then they add Ross. They got even better. Wharton wasn't out of position. He wasn't "badly"coached. Ross was simply faster and more talented. Washington was simply faster and more talented.