If he takes any full-time coaching job, we're off the hook.Will Rutgers have to pay Flood even if he takes a coaching job next year?
Do you honestly think Flood has a chance of getting another coaching job?Will Rutgers have to pay Flood even if he takes a coaching job next year?
Yes, with Fridge recommending him and his over all body of work I think he can. I have come to conclusion that it is Rutgers and not the coaches. Since going big time, how can Anderson, Graber, Shea, Schiano, and Flood all have failed? Graber and Schiano got close but they didn't get over the hump.Do you honestly think Flood has a chance of getting another coaching job?
Not exactly. The amount we owe him is just offset or reduced by the amount he earns from any new job, regardless of whether it's coaching.If he takes any full-time coaching job, we're off the hook.
That's what I thought - that he was getting a lump sum buyout from the school. Same thing for Hermann.Isn't the buyout to make a one time payoff to cancel the remainder of the contract?
Isn't the buyout to make a one time payoff to cancel the remainder of the contract?
Isn't the buyout to make a one time payoff to cancel the remainder of the contract?
The university didn't make it clear how the buyout works. Julie has multiple years to be paid off. She is gong to be paying the tax man quite a bit if she gets a lump sum.This. Isn't that the whole purpose of the buyout increase when Floods contract was previously extended?
He continues to be paid bi-weekly, but for only another year, per NJ.com's report.That's what I thought - that he was getting a lump sum buyout from the school. Same thing for Hermann.
The contract amendment states biweekly payments.The university didn't make it clear how the buyout works. Julie has multiple years to be paid off. She is gong to be paying the tax man quite a bit if she gets a lump sum.
Hahahahaha......good one!Will Rutgers have to pay Flood even if he takes a coaching job next year?
Dude ur the biggest troll on this board. Everyday you ask such stupid questions. At first I thought you were a little slow. Now I know you trollYes, with Fridge recommending him and his over all body of work I think he can. I have come to conclusion that it is Rutgers and not the coaches. Since going big time, how can Anderson, Graber, Shea, Schiano, and Flood all have failed? Graber and Schiano got close but they didn't get over the hump.
No, it's in his contract that if he gets a head coaching job or becomes the Secretary General of the UN, we are off the hook.Will Rutgers have to pay Flood even if he takes a coaching job next year?
Will Rutgers have to pay Flood even if he takes a coaching job next year?
Flood will never be head coach every again. Haven't you been watching the last few years ? He is a nice man, but coaching football is not something he should pursue any further
His extension amends the original contract to state:
In the case of termination of Mr. Flood by the University without cause,
Rutgers shall pay Mr. Flood $1,400,000 and no other amount or item.
The amount to be paid shall be paid minus all applicable and
appropriate payroll deductions on a bi-weekly basis in equal
installments in accordance with regular University payroll procedures,
from the date of termination through February 28, 2019
The original contract states this payment is offset by ANY OTHER EMPLOYMENT.
I am not a troll and I am not a liar like you are.Dude ur the biggest troll on this board. Everyday you ask such stupid questions. At first I thought you were a little slow. Now I know you troll
Not sure Middlesex HS is paying that much.