Or Illinois. OSU and Oregon just reload. Must be their fieldhouses..I can't wait until the thread in 9 months about how we have more talent than OSU and Oregon.
Despite not having enough talent to beat KSU.
Or Illinois. OSU and Oregon just reload. Must be their fieldhouses..I can't wait until the thread in 9 months about how we have more talent than OSU and Oregon.
Despite not having enough talent to beat KSU.
Some of his responses have to be trolls. Like saying kstate has far superior talent with recruiting classes ranked in the 60s. Then say the recruiting rankings are wrong but wants Rutgers to get recruits ranked highly by the services he says are wrong.He is not trolling - he is a nitwit.
that’s harsh, unfair and uncalled for, bashing actual nitwits like that.He is not trolling - he is a nitwit.
Indiana and Michigan are flinging money around like nobody's business to kids out of high school and who choose to flee their college commitments in search of the all mighty dollar. I'm not interested in bidding wars for high schoolers, college kids or even the pros for that matter. And these college kids are now pros with no oversight, structure, or restriction. It's getting sillier by the moment and it's destroying what collegiate, amateur sports was all about.Indiana just landed Cals QB, who is a baller.
Michigan landed the #1 QB in this recruiting class. We’re landing lower division kids whom we hope will be able to play in the Big Ten. Hope it works out for us.
How did Rutgers coaches adapt after their first half experience? The balled up into a shell and stopped doing what worked for them. Second half, Rutgers defenders seemed to be hiding rather than being in position, swarming to the ball and taking proper angles. How many gigantic chunk plays happened where a Rutgers defender was not in five or ten yards of a receiver/ball carrier. That's piss poor execution, not lack of talent.The Kstate Coaches learned from their first half experience and adapted, to take better advantage of their kids superior speed and talent. On the 65 yard run, their offensive line put our defenders on roller skates. The hole the back ran through was as wide as the Red Sea. That’s not coaching. That’s talent. They put a hat on hat and beat us up.
Their best RB opted out and they still ran for 347 yards. They ran for that many yards because they exploited RU's bad defensive fundamentals. As a previous poster mentioned, on many of those explosion plays, there wasn't a defender within 10 yards because they were completely out of position.Put the running back on our team and we win the game. Their offensive line dominated our defense, which is why they ran for well over 347 rushing yards while we rushed for 164 rushing yards. That’s not a negligible talent difference. Their line was much better than ours.
Furthermore, Didn’t we out scheme them over the course of scoring 41 points? Of course we did. The point differential was also negligible. But at the end of the day, they were simply the better team.
Re: the last part applies to the basketball team as well.Their best RB opted out and they still ran for 347 yards. They ran for that many yards because they exploited RU's bad defensive fundamentals. As a previous poster mentioned, on many of those explosion plays, there wasn't a defender within 10 yards because they were completely out of position.
What does a field house get you that we don’t already have through Hale Center etc.? I honestly don’t know.It was evident to me that they were much faster than we were. Their superior Fieldhouse provided them with the edge to recruit better players. Their players executed, and we didn’t execute as well.