Massey Composite Since 1998

[brgRC90]

Based on Massey, this was (incredibly) only our 4th worst year in the last 20.

1998: 79/112 (71%) SHEA
1999: 106/114 (93%) SHEA
2000: 94/115 (82%) SHEA
2001: 106/117 (91%) SCHIANO
2002: 112/117 (96%) SCHIANO
2003: 73/117 (62%) SCHIANO
2004: 84/117 (72%) SCHIANO
2005: 51/119 (43%) SCHIANO
2006: 17/119 (14%) SCHIANO
2007: 39/120 (33%) SCHIANO
2008: 36/120 (30%) SCHIANO
2009: 38/120 (32%) SCHIANO
2010: 88/120 (73%) SCHIANO
2011: 35/120 (29%) SCHIANO
2012: 47/124 (38%) FLOOD
2013: 88/125 (70%) FLOOD
2014: 48/128 (38%) FLOOD
2015: 92/128 (72%) FLOOD
2016: 113/128 (88%) ASH
2017: 95/130 (73%) ASH
2018: 117/130 (90%) ASH

 

[MGSA99]

What about 1997?

 

[brgRC90]

The archive only goes back to 1998.

 

[MoobyCow]

Go team.

 

[DennisHajekRC84]

Based on Massey, this was (incredibly) only our 4th worst year in the last 20.

1998: 79/112 (71%) SHEA
1999: 106/114 (93%) SHEA
2000: 94/115 (82%) SHEA
2001: 106/117 (91%) SCHIANO
2002: 112/117 (96%) SCHIANO
2003: 73/117 (62%) SCHIANO
2004: 84/117 (72%) SCHIANO
2005: 51/119 (43%) SCHIANO
2006: 17/119 (14%) SCHIANO
2007: 39/120 (33%) SCHIANO
2008: 36/120 (30%) SCHIANO
2009: 38/120 (32%) SCHIANO
2010: 88/120 (73%) SCHIANO
2011: 35/120 (29%) SCHIANO
2012: 47/124 (38%) FLOOD
2013: 88/125 (70%) FLOOD
2014: 48/128 (38%) FLOOD
2015: 92/128 (72%) FLOOD
2016: 113/128 (88%) ASH
2017: 95/130 (73%) ASH
2018: 117/130 (90%) ASH

Ash with 2 of the top 5 in three years. At least Gary went down significantly in year 3. Ash had his worst in year 3.

3-4 year avg.
Ash = 84%
Shea= 82%
Flood = 54%

If Flood could have landed Barkley with Russel at QB....maybe.

 

[brgRC90]

Ash with 2 of the top 5 in three years. At least Gary went down significantly in year 3. Ash had his worst in year 3.

3-4 year avg.
Ash = 84%
Shea= 82%
Flood = 54%

If Flood could have landed Barkley with Russel at QB....maybe.

It's only fair to note that Ash has had a far harder schedule than his predecessors. But his results have still been unacceptably bad.

 

[MoobyCow]

It's only fair to note that Ash has had a far harder schedule than his predecessors. But his results have still been unacceptably bad.

The computer rankings are supposed to consider the schedule as part of the equation. It's not perfect, but it's about the best you can do.

 

[DennisHajekRC84]

It's only fair to note that Ash has had a far harder schedule than his predecessors. But his results have still been unacceptably bad.

won't get an argument from me...

 

[RU848789]

Based on Massey, this was (incredibly) only our 4th worst year in the last 20.

1998: 79/112 (71%) SHEA
1999: 106/114 (93%) SHEA
2000: 94/115 (82%) SHEA
2001: 106/117 (91%) SCHIANO
2002: 112/117 (96%) SCHIANO
2003: 73/117 (62%) SCHIANO
2004: 84/117 (72%) SCHIANO
2005: 51/119 (43%) SCHIANO
2006: 17/119 (14%) SCHIANO
2007: 39/120 (33%) SCHIANO
2008: 36/120 (30%) SCHIANO
2009: 38/120 (32%) SCHIANO
2010: 88/120 (73%) SCHIANO
2011: 35/120 (29%) SCHIANO
2012: 47/124 (38%) FLOOD
2013: 88/125 (70%) FLOOD
2014: 48/128 (38%) FLOOD
2015: 92/128 (72%) FLOOD
2016: 113/128 (88%) ASH
2017: 95/130 (73%) ASH
2018: 117/130 (90%) ASH

Who wouldn't kill to have those 30s/40s back again? Like we had in 6 of Greg's last 7 years, with a pass, IMO, on 2010, due to the LeGrand tragedy (and Schiano's worst year in his last 8 was still as good as Ash's best year). It's so sad how far this program has fallen since Greg left - right back to Shea level ineptitude.

 

[slyker]

What about 1997?

Why do you care? You said you didn’t even watch the game on Saturday because you cared so little

 

[munson15]

Ash with 2 of the top 5 in three years. At least Gary went down significantly in year 3. Ash had his worst in year 3.

3-4 year avg.
Ash = 84%
Shea= 82%
Flood = 54%

If Flood could have landed Barkley with Russel at QB....maybe.

Flood also benefited from well stocked cupboards. The team from his first season had 10 guys drafted.

 

[graystork]

Based on Massey, this was (incredibly) only our 4th worst year in the last 20.

1998: 79/112 (71%) SHEA
1999: 106/114 (93%) SHEA
2000: 94/115 (82%) SHEA
2001: 106/117 (91%) SCHIANO
2002: 112/117 (96%) SCHIANO
2003: 73/117 (62%) SCHIANO
2004: 84/117 (72%) SCHIANO
2005: 51/119 (43%) SCHIANO
2006: 17/119 (14%) SCHIANO
2007: 39/120 (33%) SCHIANO
2008: 36/120 (30%) SCHIANO
2009: 38/120 (32%) SCHIANO
2010: 88/120 (73%) SCHIANO
2011: 35/120 (29%) SCHIANO
2012: 47/124 (38%) FLOOD
2013: 88/125 (70%) FLOOD
2014: 48/128 (38%) FLOOD
2015: 92/128 (72%) FLOOD
2016: 113/128 (88%) ASH
2017: 95/130 (73%) ASH
2018: 117/130 (90%) ASH

You gotta look at the number of teams involved not just percentile. There are 13 more teams since 2001 and most are pretty bad. Yet the good teams are still up front. Schiano never finished worse than 112. Ash has broken that record twice in three years with a 113 and a 117. He has the 2 worst ranked teams in Rutgers history.
We are drifting further away from football success even with more bad teams in D1.