Okay so thanks for not answering my question.Lol thats 35 years ago
How would anyone know ? And also irrelevant at this pointOkay so thanks for not answering my question.
No. We will not make the NIT. You actually have to have a decent record plus a quality high net. We have neither.If we win, can we make the NIT at .500?
No. We will not make the NIT. You actually have to have a decent record plus a quality high net. We have neither.
Exactly.. make it stop. Let’s start preparing for next year.Why anyone would root for this torturous season to continue is beyond me
I was still rooting for NIT at 2pm today. But even I'm over it.Why anyone would root for this torturous season to continue is beyond me
And a year later Simpson still can't make a shot.I hope fans remember last season when Hofstra embarrassed Rutgers at the RAC in the first round of the NIT.The team clearly wasn't prepared to play.
I wish we had last year’s Simpson instead of this year’sAnd a year later Simpson still can't make a shot.
LouIf we win, can we make the NIT at .500?
Thanks. Time to end this season.Lou
The answer is the criteria has changed for the NIT bids since those early Wenzel yesrs
Back then …the NIT was privately owned and they invited who they thought was the next best 32 teams , but there was a emphasis on getting Intersting match ups for getting ticket sales , and they tried to get local match ups in the early rounds….
Once the NCAA purchased the NIT, they made it a criteria for the small league regular season champ to be taken if they didn’t make the NCAA through their tournment,(they changed the rule this year, not sure to what ) and they went to ncaa style seeding and brackets to reallt take the next best 32 teams by the same criteria as selecting the ncaa
So…getting to .500 gives us a chance , but most of the NIT field is approx teams number 50 thorough 80 …and I think , even if we won 2 big ten tourney games to get to 17-17, we would be short in getting invited to the NIT….
We probably needed to finish 17-14, and won one in the BTN tourney and we would have solidly be in at 18-15
Maybe at 17-15
Hope this helps …..don’t shoot the messenger
POD - Pathetic Post of the Day.I cant ever recall disliking a player like i do Fernandes. A human turnover, no court vision.m Glad he is done.
ThisLou
The answer is the criteria has changed for the NIT bids since those early Wenzel yesrs
Back then …the NIT was privately owned and they invited who they thought was the next best 32 teams , but there was a emphasis on getting Intersting match ups for getting ticket sales , and they tried to get local match ups in the early rounds….
Once the NCAA purchased the NIT, they made it a criteria for the small league regular season champ to be taken if they didn’t make the NCAA through their tournment,(they changed the rule this year, not sure to what ) and they went to ncaa style seeding and brackets to reallt take the next best 32 teams by the same criteria as selecting the ncaa
So…getting to .500 gives us a chance , but most of the NIT field is approx teams number 50 thorough 80 …and I think , even if we won 2 big ten tourney games to get to 17-17, we would be short in getting invited to the NIT….
We probably needed to finish 17-14, and won one in the BTN tourney and we would have solidly be in at 18-15
Maybe at 17-15
Hope this helps …..don’t shoot the messenger
We should all be grateful we didn't get a bid. All we would have done was embarrassed ourselves like we did the last two weeks of the season and like we did last year. The team quit on the season.If RU got to .500% would we have received NIT bid?
I see a team RU defeated, Seton Hall, blowing out north Texas right now in the 2nd round.
3 Big Ten teams are still playing in it too.
-vic