Who's winning in the trenches..?It's the Jimmy's and Joes!? Who has the better talent and is getting massively outschemed?
Who's winning in the trenches..?It's the Jimmy's and Joes!? Who has the better talent and is getting massively outschemed?
Yessireebob! That's the greatest offense since the wishbone.Someone tell me this offense is not the one we are trying to implement.
Even Ohio State has to block people for this offense to work. When they don't, they look like RU when they run it.Someone tell me this offense is not the one we are trying to implement.
Where a team is getting outcoached doesn't matter. Clemson has a far superior offensive scheme. OSU's offense is unimaginably simplistic.Who's winning in the trenches..?
You cannot possibly think these two offenses are similar except for execution.Clemson looks just fine running the spread.
It's the players, not the scheme.
Football still comes down to winning up front.
You mean that someone has to coach and develop the Jimmys and Joes once they get in the program? What a novel concept.Where a team is getting outcoached doesn't matter. Clemson has a far superior offensive scheme. OSU's offense is unimaginably simplistic.
And compare recruiting classes. OSU clearly has the Jimmy's and Joe's. They are getting outcoached by a far superior tactician.
OSU's talent, with the notable exception of QB, is clearly superior. Clemson is playing a far smarter game because they are better coached. Better schemes and far better play-calling. Keep the teams the same and flip the coaching staffs? Swinney wins by a mile.Skillet: they are very similar.
And I'd go a step further and say Clemson is running a lot of what we were running.
You have to win up front regardless of how many stars you have.
Clemson is getting far superior blocking. The schemes aren't that different. OSU hasn't blocked anybody all night. Watson is a better passer than Barrett, and his receivers are better.Where a team is getting outcoached doesn't matter. Clemson has a far superior offensive scheme. OSU's offense is unimaginably simplistic.
And compare recruiting classes. OSU clearly has the Jimmy's and Joe's. They are getting outcoached by a far superior tactician.
Schemes are night and day. OSU game plan was the Jimmy and Joe game plan: "We're tougher than themClemson is getting far superior blocking. The schemes aren't that different. OSU hasn't blocked anybody all night. Watson is a better passer than Barrett, and his receivers are better.
Must not, Mike! OSU has played incredibly close to the vest, while Clemson has opened up the field. On defense, Clemson has run blitz packages, while OSU has tried to outmuscle.Skillet: the schemes are quite similar. We can disagree.
The Clemson QB hit on some bombs early and OSU is forced to respect it opening things up in the running game and along the outside.
Meanwhile Clemson is getting all kinds of pressure keeping 7 and 8 in coverage.
I honestly don't know how we're watching the same game?
Either way both Ohio State and Michigan have laid eggs and proven themselves to be overrated.
Which team has two all-American offensive linemen? Which team has had top five recruiting classes filling their roster? They are simply getting outschemed mammothly.Again, Clemson rushed just four there -- look at that crazy pressure.
That has nothing to do with scheme and everything to do with getting owned up front.
Maybe that's coaching, but I think Clemson's guys are just better -- by a good amount -- up front.
Mike, listen to yourself. Swinney is outcoaching Meyer up and down the field.Skillet: Clemson is keeping their safeties way back knowing the pressure is hitting home.
Meyer has to run and dink and dunk to force a safety up. It's not working
Now he just has to take shots downfield regardless because he's down big late.
Worked 2x in a row. Then it leads to an INT.
It's boys against men in this game. tOSU lost 11 guys to the NFL and are starting a lot of freshmen and sophomores. IIRC, the are losing only one guy to graduation this year. Compare that to, say, Meat Chicken, who is losing 15 starters. As bad as Clemson is making tOSU look tonight, the next couple of years will be very good ones for Urban.Clemson looks just fine running the spread.
It's the players, not the scheme.
Football still comes down to winning up front.