Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think it really matters. The Conference hasn't dissolved yet...the assets belong with the remaining members.PAC-2 is obviously filing a lawsuit to prevent them from doing so. What can these assets possibly be?
NCAA Tournament money, Rose Bowl Contract to name two.I'm just trying to figure out what they're wrestling over. I can't imagine the departing members care about the rights to the PAC12 conference name. The TV contracts now hold no sway. What could possibly be worth 100MM?
Maybe the league office has that much accumulated over the yearsI'm just trying to figure out what they're wrestling over. I can't imagine the departing members care about the rights to the PAC12 conference name. The TV contracts now hold no sway. What could possibly be worth 100MM?
PAC 12 should keep it.. those 2 teams.I don't think it really matters. The Conference hasn't dissolved yet...the assets belong with the remaining members.
I'm just trying to figure out what they're wrestling over. I can't imagine the departing members care about the rights to the PAC12 conference name. The TV contracts now hold no sway. What could possibly be worth 100MM?
Seems like the more I'm reading (and if I'm understanding correctly), it's the PAC12 revenues of 2023-24...so even though most teams are fleeing to greener pastures for 2024-25, they are competing this year in the PAC12 and generating revenue for the PAC12 network in 23-24 and they want their cut of it to balance their AD budgets. If this is correct, it does make sense and all 12 teams really should have a say I would think.Exit fees?
They have a two year grace period. I think the BE did too when they got raided, of course that wasn’t as dire as getting whittled down to two schools.Wait, the Pac-2 will be an actual entity?
Good lord.
While true.. those exiting teams have destroyed any investments that WSU and OSU made to compete in the PAC12. What they are destroying, in terms of WSU and OSU is worth far more than $100M. WSU and OSU should have full control going forward as well as ownership of the history of the PAC12.Seems like the more I'm reading (and if I'm understanding correctly), it's the PAC12 revenues of 2023-24...so even though most teams are fleeing to greener pastures for 2024-25, they are competing this year in the PAC12 and generating revenue for the PAC12 network in 23-24 and they want their cut of it to balance their AD budgets. If this is correct, it does make sense and all 12 teams really should have a say I would think.
Seems like the more I'm reading (and if I'm understanding correctly), it's the PAC12 revenues of 2023-24...so even though most teams are fleeing to greener pastures for 2024-25, they are competing this year in the PAC12 and generating revenue for the PAC12 network in 23-24 and they want their cut of it to balance their AD budgets. If this is correct, it does make sense and all 12 teams really should have a say I would think.
So basically a two year holding pattern as the PAC-2 and MWC figure things out.